Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 59(9):409-415 | DOI: 10.17221/7652-CJAS
Domestic and Interbull information in the single step genomic evaluation of Holstein milk productionOriginal Paper
- Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
Estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values for milk production of young genotyped Holstein bulls were predicted using a conventional animal model, ridge regression genomic prediction procedure, genomic best linear unbiased prediction, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction, and one-step blending procedures. For prediction, the nation-wide database of domestic Czech production records was combined with deregressed proofs from Interbull files through 2008, which had been transformed by multiple across country evaluation to reflect domestic production conditions. 1259 genotyped bulls had already been proven in 2008. Analyses were run that used Interbull values only for these genotyped bulls and used Interbull values for all available sires. Predictions were validated by comparing correlations of breeding value predictions with estimated breeding values and daughter-yield-deviations after progeny test in 2012 of 140 young genotyped bulls and their associated reliabilities. Combining domestic data with Interbull estimated breeding values improved prediction of both estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values. Prediction by animal model (traditional estimated breeding values) using only the domestic database had 0.29 validated reliability of prediction; whereas combining the nation-wide domestic database with all available deregressed proofs for genotyped and non-genotyped sires from Interbull resulted in reliability of 0.34, compared to 0.36 when using Interbull data only. The highest reliabilities were for predictions from the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction procedure using combined data, or with all available deregressed proofs from Interbull only (one-step blending approach), which reached validated reliabilities for genomic enhanced breeding values predictions 0.53 and 0.54, respectively.
Keywords: genomic breeding value; single-step prediction; animal model; validated reliability
Published: September 30, 2014 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. (2010): Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 743-752.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Christensen O.F., Lund M.S. (2010): Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 2.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Forni S., Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2011): Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genetics Selection Evolution, 43, 1.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gao H., Christensen O.F., Madsen P., Nielsen U.S., Zhang Y., Lund M.S., Su G. (2012): Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two singlestep blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population. Genetics Selection Evolution, 44, 8.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Legarra A., Ducrocq V. (2012): Computation strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 4629-4654.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Liu Z.T., Seefried F.R., Reinhardt F., Rensing S., Thaller G., Reents R. (2011): Impact of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution, 43, 19.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. (2001): Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157, 1819-1829.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Misztal I., Legarra A., Aguilar I. (2009): Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4648-4655.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Pribyl J., Rehout V., Citek J., Pribylova J. (2010): Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using a simple heritable genetic ground. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90, 1765-1773.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Pribyl J., Haman J., Kott T., Pribylova J., Simeckova M., Vostry L., Zavadilova L., Cermak V., Ruzicka Z., Splichal J., Verner M., Motycka J., Vondrasek L. (2012): Single-step prediction of genomic breeding value in a small dairy cattle population with strong import of foreign genes. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 151-159.
Go to original source...
- Pribyl J., Madsen P., Bauer J., Pribylova J., Simeckova M., Vostry L., Zavadilova L. (2013): Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 1865-1873.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rozzi P., Schaeffer L.R., Burnside E.B., Schlote W. (1990): International evaluation of Holstein-Friesian dairy sires from three countries. Livestock Production Science, 24, 15-28.
Go to original source...
- Schaeffer L. (1994): Multiple-country comparison of dairy sire. Journal of Dairy Science, 77, 2671-2678.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schulz-Streeck T., Ogutu J.O., Piepho H.P. (2013): Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126, 69-82.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Su G., Madsen P., Nielsen U.S., Mantysaari E.A., Aamand G.P., Christensen O.F., Lund M.S. (2012): Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 909-917.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Szyda J., Ptak E., Komisarek J., Zarnecki A. (2008): Practical application of daughter yield deviations in dairy cattle breeding. Journal of Applied Genetics, 49, 183-191.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Szyda J., Zarnecki A., Suchocki T., Kaminski S. (2011): Fitting and validating the genomic evaluation model to Polish Holstein-Friesian cattle. Journal of Applied Genetics, 52, 363-366.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Szyda J., Zukowski K., Kaminski S., Zarnecki A. (2013): Testing different single nucleotide polymorphism selection strategies for prediction of genomic breeding values in dairy cattle based on low density panels. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 58, 136-145.
Go to original source...
- VanRaden P.M. (2008): Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4414-4423.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Vitezica Z.G., Aguilar I., Misztal I., Legarra A. (2011): Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genetics Research, 93, 357-366.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.