Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2005, 50(12):545-552 | DOI: 10.17221/4260-CJAS
Comparison of granddaughter design and general pedigree design analysis of QTL in dairy cattle: a simulation study
- 1 Research Institute for the Biology of Farm Animals (FBN) Dummerstorf, Dummerstorf, Germany
- 2 Monsanto Company Animal AG, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Traditional methods for detection and mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in dairy cattle populations are usually based on daughter design (DD) or granddaughter design (GDD). Although these designs are well established and usually successful in detecting QTL, they consider sire families independently of each other, thereby ignoring relationships among other animals in the population and consequently, reducing the power of QTL detection. In this study we compared a traditional GDD with a general pedigree design (GPD) and assessed the precision and power of both methods for detecting and locating QTL in a simulated complex pedigree. QTL analyses were performed under the variance component model containing a random QTL and a random polygenic effect. The covariance matrix of the polygenic effect was a standard additive relationship matrix. The (co)variance matrix of the random QTL effect contained probabilities that QTL alleles shared by two individuals were identical by descent (IBD). In the GDD analysis, IBD probabilities were calculated using sires' and daughters' marker genotypes. In the GPD analysis, IBD probabilities were obtained using a deterministic approach. The estimation of QTL position and variance components was conducted using REML algorithm. Although both methods were able to locate the region of the QTL properly, the GPD method showed better precision of QTL position estimates in most cases and significantly higher power than the GDD method.
Keywords: QTL mapping; granddaughter design; general pedigree design; computer simulation
Published: December 31, 2005 Show citation
References
- Darvasi A., Soller M. (1997): A simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of QTL map location. Behav. Genet., 27, 125-132.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Freyer G., Sørensen P., Kühn C., Weikard R., Hoeschele I. (2003): Search for pleiotropic QTL on chromosome BTA6 affecting yield traits of milk production. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 999-1008.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gilmour A.R., Gogel B.J., Cullis B.R., Welham S.J.S., Thompson R. (2002): ASReml User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.
- Khatkar M.S., Thomson P.C., Tammen I., Raadsma H.W. (2004): Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: review and meta-analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol., 36, 163- 191.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Knott S.A., Haley C.S. (1998): Simple multiple-marker sib-pair analysis for mapping quantitative trait loci. Heredity, 81, 48-54.
Go to original source...
- Lee S.H., van der Werf J.H.J. (2004): The efficiency of designs for fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci using combined linkage disequilibrium and linkage. Genet. Sel. Evol., 36, 145-161.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mayer M., Liu Y., Freyer G. (2004): A simulation study on the accuracy of position and effect estimates of linked QTL and their asymptotic standard deviations using multiple interval mapping in an F2 scheme. Genet. Sel. Evol., 36, 455-479.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Meuwissen T.H.E., Karlsen A., Lien S., Olsaker I., Goddard M.E. (2002): Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genetics, 161, 373-379.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Pong-Wong R., George A.W., Wooliams J.A., Haley C.S. (2001): A simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers. Genet. Sel. Evol., 33, 453-471.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schelling M., Stricker C., Fernando R.L., Künzi N. (1998): PEDSIM - A simulation program for pedgree data. In: Proc. 6th World Congr. Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia. Vol. 27, 475-476.
- Sørensen P., Lund M.S., Guldbrandtsen B., Jensen J., Sorensen D. (2003): A comparison of bivariate and univariate QTL mapping in livestock populations. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35, 605-622.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Vukasinovic N., Martinez M.L. (2002): Mapping quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees using the random model approach. In: Proc. Joint Stat. Meet. (CD-ROM), American Statistical Association, New York City, USA. Available at http://www.math.usu.edu/~vukasino/text/JSM2002_paper.pdf.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.