Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2022, 67(11):425-441 | DOI: 10.17221/172/2022-CJAS

Application strategy for sustainable livestock production with farm animal algorithms in response to climate change up to 2050: A reviewReview

Sang-O Park ORCID...
Institute of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

Global warming caused by climate change can increase heat stress and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leading to food problems and livestock crises. Thus, pre-emptive responses are required to mitigate the food problems and livestock crises. The potential of a livestock crisis caused by global warming highlights the need for sustainable livestock production in response to climate change using a farm animal algorithm in order to address the population increase and avoid food problems in the future. In particular, the demand for animal-based foods has increased. Such a climate change threatens the livestock environment, production, reproductive efficiency, animal behaviour and welfare, while increasing the heat stress, livestock malodours, and GHG emissions. For these reasons, it is necessary to understand the concurrent mechanisms related to these effects of global warming, animal nutrition, animal feeding and management, animal heat stress and in ovo injection, and carbon neutral livestock. Climate-smart livestock systems are being implemented to overcome the livestock crisis caused by climate change and to maintain sustainable livestock production. This review emphasises the importance of sustainable livestock production using farm animal algorithms in response to a future livestock crisis caused by climate change in 2050.

Keywords: carbon neutral; livestock crisis; heat stress; in ovo; smart livestock

Published: November 30, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Park S. Application strategy for sustainable livestock production with farm animal algorithms in response to climate change up to 2050: A review. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2022;67(11):425-441. doi: 10.17221/172/2022-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Adamides G, Kalatzis N, Stylianou A, Marianos N, Chatzipapadopoulos F, Giannakopoulou M, Papadavid G, Vassiliou V, Neocleous D. Smart farming techniques for climate change adaptation in Cyprus. Atmosphere. 2020 May;11(6):557-88. Go to original source...
  2. Admin L. Current and future economic impact of heat stress in the U.S. livestock and poultry sectors. Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Community. 2019 Mar 5. Available from: https://lpelc.org/
  3. Alves LKS, Viana GP, dos Santos TS, Guimaraes EBB, Nacimento RA, Raineri C, da Silva ACS. In-ovo feeding: A review. Vet Not. 2020 Aug;26(1):50-67. Go to original source...
  4. Anisi MHM, Abdul-Salaam G, Abdullah AH. A survey of wireless sensor network approaches and their energy consumption for monitoring farm fields in precision agriculture. Precision Agric. 2014 Sep;16(2):216-38. Go to original source...
  5. Astill J, Dara RA, Fraser EDG, Roberts B, Sharif S. Smart poultry management: Smart sensors, big data, and the internet of things. Comput Electron Agric. 2020 Mar; 170:105291-402. Go to original source...
  6. Bao J, Xie Q. Artificial intelligence in animal farming: A systematic literature review. J Cleaner Prod. 2022 Jan 10; 331:129956-82. Go to original source...
  7. Bell MJ, Potterton SI, Craigon J, Saunders N, Wilcox RH, Hunter M. Variation in enteric methane emissions among cows on commercial dairy farms. Animal. 2014 Jun; 8(9):1540-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Berckmans D. General introduction to precision livestock farming. Anim Front. 2017 Jan;7(1):6-11. Go to original source...
  9. Bernstein C. Smart farming. 2019 Jun. Available from: https://www.techtarget.com/iotagenda/definition/smart-farming
  10. Botta A, De Donato W, Persico V, Pescape A. Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: A survey. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2016 Mar;56:684-700. Go to original source...
  11. Bozakova NA, Sptioov LK, Saskova N, Lakticova KV. Welfare improvement in laying hens during the hot period under a semi-open rearing system through dietary arginine and vitamin C supplementation. Bulgalian J Vet Med. 2015 Jan;18(3):216-26. Go to original source...
  12. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy. 2016 (cited 28 November 2017). Available from https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-reviewof-world-energy.html
  13. Broucek J. Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: A review. J Environ Protection. 2014 Nov; 5(15):1482-566. Go to original source...
  14. Caria M, Schudrowitz J, Jukan A, Kemper N. Smart farm computing systems for animal welfare monitoring. 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing; 2017 May 22. p. 152-7. Go to original source...
  15. Caulfield MP, Cambridge H, Foster SF, McGreevy PD. Heat stress: A major contributor to poor animal welfare associated with long-haul live export voyages. Vet J. 2014 Feb;199(2):223-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Choukidar GA, Dawande NA. A survey on smart poultry farm automation and monitoring system. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2017 Mar;6(3):4806-10. Go to original source...
  17. Dawkins MS. Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want. Front Anim Sci. 2021 Aug 23;2:1-9. Go to original source...
  18. de Haan C. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2006.
  19. Debauche O, Elmoulat M, Ahmoudi SM, Bindelle J, Lebeau F. Farm animals' behaviors and welfare analysis with AI algorithms: A review. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle. 2021 Jun;35(3):243-53. Go to original source...
  20. Deloitte. Smart livestock farming, potential of digitalization froglobal meat supply [Internet]. 2017 Nov. 36 p. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/operations/Smart-livestock-farming_Deloitte.pdf
  21. El-Sabrout K, Ahmad S, El-Deek A. The in ovo feeding technique as a recent aspect of poultry farming. J Anim Health Prod. 2019 Nov;7(4):126-30. Go to original source...
  22. EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency. Global anthropogenic non-CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions: 1990-2020 [Internet]. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2006 Jun. 274 p. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/2000ZL5G.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2006+Thru+2010&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C06thru10%5CTxt%5C00000000%5C2000ZL5G.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL
  23. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Climate change and food security: Risks and responses. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2015. 122 p.
  24. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Information and communication technology (ICT) in agriculture. A report to the G20 agricultural deputies. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017. 57 p.
  25. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Five practical actions toward low-carbon livestock. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019. 40 p.
  26. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Climate change and your food: Ten facts. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2021. Available from: https://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/356770/icode/
  27. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global livestock environmental assessment model (GLEAM). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2022.
  28. Fawzy S, Osman AI, Doran J, Rooney DW. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2020 Jul;18:2069-94. Go to original source...
  29. Feebles ED. In ovo applications in poultry: A review. Poult Sci. 2018 Jul 1;97(1):2322-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Freeman K, Mungai C. The future of farming: The potential of young people in the agriculture sector. Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security; 2021. Available from: https://ccafs.cgiar.org/news/future-farming-potentialyoung-people-agriculture-sector
  31. Gaire R, Lefort L, Compton M, Falzon G, Lamb D, Taylor K. Semantic web enabled smart farming. 1st International Workshop on Semantic Machine Learning and Linked Open Data (SML2OD2013) for Agricultural and Environmental Informatics; Sydney. 2013 Oct. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication//255704548_Semantic_Web_Enabled_Smart_Farming
  32. Garcia L, Parra L, Jimenez JM, Lloret J, Lorenz P. IoT-based smart irrigation systems: An overview on the recent trends on sensors and IoT systems for irrigation in precision agriculture. Sensors. 2020 Feb;20(4):1042-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio A. Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. 115 p. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/018/i34437e/ i3437e.pdf
  34. Godde C, Mason-D'Croz D, Mayberry D, Thornton PK, Herrero M. Risk of climate-related impacts on the livestock sector: A review of the evidence. Global Food Security. 2021 Mar;28:100488-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Gonzalez-Rivasa PA, Warnera RD. Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2020 Apr;162:108025-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Goud KS, Sudharson A. Internet based smart poultry farm. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 1;8(19):101-6. Go to original source...
  37. Grady MJO, Hare GO. Modelling the smart farm. Inf Process Agric. 2017 Sep;4(3):1-30.
  38. Halachmi I, Guarino M, Bewley J, Pastell M. Smart animal agriculture: Application of real-time sensors to improve animal well-being and production. Annual Rev Anim Biosci. 2019 Feb;7:403-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Havlik P, Herrero HVM, Notenbaert A. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. PNAS. 2014 Feb 24;111(10):3709-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Herrero M, Wirsenius S, Henderson B, Rigolot C, Thornton P, Havlik P, De Boer I, Gerber PJ. Livestock and the environment: What have we learned in the past decade? Ann Rev Environ Res. 2015 Nov;40(30):177-202. Go to original source...
  41. Hidosa D, Guyo M. Climate change effects on livestock feed resources: A review. J Fish Livest Prod. 2017 Jan; 5(4):259-64.
  42. Horrillo A, Gaspar P, Escribano M. Organic farming as a strategy to reduce carbon footprint in Dehesa Agroecosystems: A case study comparing dierent livestock products. Animals. 2020 Jan;10(1):162-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Hoste R, Suh H, Kortstee H. Smart farming in pig production and greenhouse horticulture. An inventory in the Netherlands. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research; 2017 Oct. p. 1-38. Go to original source...
  44. Huhtanen P, Ramin M, Ude P. Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 1. Model description and sensitivity analysis. Livest Sci. 2015 Aug; 178:71-90. Go to original source...
  45. Ilapakurti A, Vuppalapati C. Building an IoT framework for connected dairy. IEEE 1st International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Application (BigDataService); 2015 Mar 30-Apr 2; Redwood City, USA. IEEE; 2015 Aug 13. p. 275-85. Go to original source...
  46. Iwasaki W, Morita N, Nagata MPB. IoT sensors for smart livestock management. In: Mitsubayashi K, Niwa O, Ueno Y, editors. Chemical, gas, and biosensors for internet of things and related applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 207-21. Go to original source...
  47. Jankoski LGQ, Fischer ML. The role of bioethics in animal ethics commissions. Revista Bioeica. 2019 Feb;27 (3):549-65. Go to original source...
  48. Jayaraman PP, Palmer D, Zaslavsky A, Salehi A, Georgakopoulos D. Addressing information processing needs of digital agriculture with open IoT platform. In: Zarko IA, Pripuzic K, Serrano M, editors. Interoperability and open-source solutions for the internet of things. Cham: Springer; 2015 Jan. p. 137-52. Go to original source...
  49. Ji ES, Park KH. Study on the impacts and countermeasures of climate change on livestock agriculture. J Anim Environ Sci. 2015 Jun 19;21(1):47-54. Go to original source...
  50. Jones TA, Donnelly CA, Dawkins MS. Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the UK and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poult Sci. 2005 Aug;84(8):1155-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Kadzere CT. Environmentally smart animal agriculture and integrated advisory services ameliorate the negative effects of climate change on production. South African J Anim Sci. 2018 Oct 9;48(5):842-57. Go to original source...
  52. Kaloxylos A, Eigenmann R, Teye F, Politopoulou Z, Wolfert S, Shrank C. Farm management systems and the future internet era. Comput Electron Agric. 2012 Nov 1;89:130-4. Go to original source...
  53. Kim MJ, Mo C, Kim HT, Cho BK, Hong SJ, Lee DH, Shin CS, Jang KJ, Kim YH, Baek I. Research and technology trend analysis by big data-based smart livestock technology: A review. J Biosyst Eng. 2021 Nov 9;46:386-98. Go to original source...
  54. Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J Dairy Sci. 2014 Jun;97(6):3231-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Laca EA. Precision livestock production: Tools and concepts. Revista Brasileira de Zootecni. 2009 Jul;38:123-32. Go to original source...
  56. Lara LJ, Rostagno MH. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals. 2013 Apr 24;3(2):356-69. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Lay DC, Fulton RM, Hester PY, Karcher DM, Kjaer JB, Mench JA, Mullens BA, Newberr y RC, Nicol CJ, O'Sullivan NP, Porter RE. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):278-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Llonch P, Haskell MJ, Dewhurst RJ, Turner SP. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: An animal welfare perspective. Animal. 2017 Feb;11(2):274-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Llonch P, Mainau E, Ipharraguerre IR, Bargo F, Tedo G, Blanch M, Manteca X. Chicken or the egg: The reciprocal association between feeding behavior and animal welfare and their impact on productivity in dairy cows. Front Vet Sci. 2018 Dec 5;5:305-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. Ma J, Zhou X, Li S, Li Z. Connecting agriculture to the internet of things through sensor networks. 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing. IEEE; 2011 Oct 19-22; Dalian, China. 2011. p. 184-7. Go to original source...
  61. Mack LA, Felver-Gant JN, Dennis RL, Cheng HW. Genetic variation alter production and behavioral responses following heat stress in 2 strains of laying hens. Poult Sci. 2013 Feb 1;92(2):285-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Madakam S, Ramaswamy R, Tripathi S. Internet of things (IoT): A literature review. J Comput Commun. 2015 Jun;3(5):164-73. Go to original source...
  63. Mahale RB, Sonavane SS. Smart poultry farm monitoring using IOT and wireless sensor networks. Int J Adv Res Computer Sci. 2016 May-Jun;7(3):187-90.
  64. Moran D, Blair KJ. Sustainable livestock systems: Anticipating demand-side challenges. Animal. 2021 Dec 1;15 (1):100288-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Moumen A, Azizi G, Chekrounk B, Baghour M. The effects of livestock methane emission on the global warming: A review. Int J Glob Warm. 2016 Feb;9(2):229-53. Go to original source...
  66. Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Ranieri MS, Bernabucci U. Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livestock Sci. 2010 May;130(1-3):57-69. Go to original source...
  67. Navarro E, Costa N, Pereira A. A systematic review of IoT solutions for smart farming. Sensors. 2020 Jul 29; 20(15):4231-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  68. Nawab A, Ibtisham F, Li G, Kieser B, Wu J, Liu W, Zhao Y, Nawab Y, Li K, Xiao M, An L. Heat stress in poultry production: Mitigation strategies to overcome the future challenges facing the global poultry industry. J Therm Biol. 2018 Dec;78(131):131-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  69. Neethirajan S. The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sens Bio-Sens Res. 2020 Aug;29:100367-75. Go to original source...
  70. Neethirajan S, Kemp B. Digital livestock farming. Sens BioSens Res. 2021 Jun;32:100408-21. Go to original source...
  71. Okada H, Nogami H, Kobayashi T, Masuda T, Itoh T. Development of ultra low power wireless sensor node with piezoelectric accelerometer for health monitoring. 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII). IEEE; 2013 Jun 16-20; Barcelona, Spain. p. 26-9. Go to original source...
  72. Padgett DA, Glaser R. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2003 Aug;24(8):444-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  73. Park SO. Applying a smart livestock system as a development strategy for the animal life industry in the future: A review. J Korean Appl Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 28; 38(1):241-62.
  74. Park SO, Zammit VA. Effect of feed restriction with betaine and ascorbic acid supplementation on caecal bacteria, short chain fatty acid, blood biomarker, duodenal morphology and growth performance of meat ducks under heat stress. European Poult Sci. 2019 Aug 28;83:1-13. Go to original source...
  75. Park BS, Um KH, Lee HS. Effect of a probiotic mixture on egg quality and egg production in laying hens. J Korean Appl Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 9;36(3):748-57.
  76. Plumer B, Fountain H. A hotter future is certain, climate panel warns. But how hot is up to us. New York Times. 2021 Aug 9. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/09/climate/climate-change-report-ipccun.html#:~:text=the%20main%20story-,A%20Hotter%20Future%20Is%20Certain%2C%20Climate%20Panel%20War ns.,thing s%20f rom%20ge tting%20 even%20worse
  77. Polsky L, Von Keyserlingk M. Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):8645-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  78. Portner HO, Roberts DC, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Tignor M, Alegria A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Loschke S, Moller V, Okem A. Summary for policymakers. In: Portner HO, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegria A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Loschke S, Moller V, Okem A, Rama B, editors. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. p. 3-33. Prepared for IPCC.
  79. Ramon-Moragues A, Carulla P, Minguez C, Villagr A, Estell F. Dairy cows activity under heat stress: A case study in Spain. Animals. 2021 Aug 4;11(8):2305-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  80. Rao SBN, Prasad KS, Rajendran D. Recent advances in amelioration of anti-nutritional factors in livestock feedstuffs. Anim Nutr Reprod Physiol. 2013 Jan 13;1(1):655-78.
  81. Renaudeau D, Collin A, Yahav S, de Basilio V, Gourdine JL, Collier RJ. Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal. 2012 May;6(5):707-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  82. Rendon-Huerta JA, Pinos-Rodrguez JM, Kebreab E. Animal nutrition strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in dairy cattle. Acta Universitaria. 2018 Nov; 28(5):34-41. Go to original source...
  83. Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi AP, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management. 2017 Jan;16(1):145-63. Go to original source...
  84. Rupesh IM, Deshpande SN, Chaudhari MA, Wagh NP. PLC based poultry automation system. Int J Sci Res. 2014 Jun;3(6):149-52. Go to original source...
  85. Terence S, Purushothaman G. Systematic review of internet of things in smart farming. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol. 2020 Apr 27;31(2): e3958. Go to original source...
  86. Thornton P, Nelson G, Mayberry D, Herrero M. Impacts of heat stress on global cattle production during the 21st century: A modelling study. Lancet. 2022 Mar 2;6(3):E192-201. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  87. Toro-Mujica P, Gonzalez-Ronquillo M. Feeding and nutritional strategies to reduce livestock greenhouse gas emissions. Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jul 2;8(2): 717426. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  88. UN - United Nations. World population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2013. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2017.html
  89. Wang YC, Han MF, Jia TP, Hu XR, Zhu HQ, Tong Z, Lin YT, Wang C, Liu DZ, Peng YZ, Wang G, Meng J, Zhai ZX, Zhang Y, Deng JG, Hsi HC. Emissions, measurement, and control of odor in livestock farms: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 1;776(3):145735-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  90. Wen C, Wei S, Zong X, Wang Y, Jin M. Microbiota-gut-brain axis and nutritional strategy under heat stress. Anim Nutr. 2021 Dec;7(4):1329-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  91. Werkheiser I. Technology and responsibility: A discussion of underexamined risks and concerns in precision livestock farming. Anim Front. 2020 Jan;10(1):51-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  92. Wilson J. Reducing the carbon footprint of cattle operations through diet. University of Nebraska Water. 2019 Aug 8. Available from: https://water.unl.edu/article/manurenutrient-management/reducing-carbon-footprint-cattleoperations-through-diet
  93. Wiokas HL. The impact of climate change on food security in South Africa. J Energy Southern Africa. 2008 Nov; 19(4):12-20. Go to original source...
  94. Xu X, Liang W, Xu Z. Remote monitoring cost minimization for an unreliable sensor network with guaranteed network throughput. Information Processing in Agriculture. 2014 Nov 5;1(4):83-94. Go to original source...
  95. Zammit VA, Park SO. Effect of smart poultry on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, caecal fermentation indices of broiler chickens. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 2021 Jan;20(3):419-32. Go to original source...
  96. Zeng T, Li JJ, Wang DQ, Li GQ, Wang GL, Lu LZ. Effects of heat stress on antioxidant defense system, inflammatory injury, and heat shock proteins of Muscovy and Pekin ducks: Evidence for differential thermal sensitivities. Cell Stress. 2014 Nov;19(6):895-901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  97. Zhao JC, Zhang JF, Feng Y, Guo JX. The study and application of the IoT technology in agriculture. 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer S cience and Information Technology; 2010 Jul 9-11; Chengdu. IEEE; 2010 Sep 7. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5565120
  98. Zurbrugg LS. Feeding 10 billion people in a climate-changing world [Internet]. Bellingham, WA, USA; 2020 May. 20 p. Available from: https://www.saturna.com/sites/saturna.com/files/files/2020/FromTheYardarm-2020_05Food-and-Climate-Change-web.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.