Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2019, 64(7):291-299 | DOI: 10.17221/7/2018-CJAS

Safety evaluation of myostatin-edited Meishan pigs by whole genome resequencing analysesOriginal Paper

Shanshan Xie, Lili Qian, Chunbo Cai, Shengwang Jiang, Gaojun Xiao, Ting Gao, Xiang Li, Wentao Cui*
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China

Genome editing technology can make specifically target genomic modifications, resulting in site specific DNA insertion, deletion or replacement in the genome of an organism. We have recently produced genetically engineered (GE) Meishan pigs containing a ZFN-edited myostatin (MSTN) loss-of-function mutation that leads to a clear "double muscle" phenotype as observed for Belgian cattle. In this study, whole genome resequencing was used as an approach to evaluate the safety risk, if any, associated with the introduction of a ZFN-edited myostatin (MSTN) loss-of-function mutation in a local pig breed, the Meishan pigs. The results of resequencing analyses show that the effective data from pigs of wild-type group and MSTN-edited GE group is greater than 99%. The 1× coverage rate is > 98%, and the 4× coverage rate is > 96%. The genetic variation on each chromosome is close to 1. From this whole genome resequencing study, our results demonstrated that 99.7% of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the same in the same genetic variation from both wild-type group and MSTN-edited GE group, implying genomic sequence variations are highly similar between the two groups of pigs.

Keywords: MSTN; gene editing; genome resequencing; genetic variation; comparative analysis

Published: July 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Xie S, Qian L, Cai C, Jiang S, Xiao G, Gao T, et al.. Safety evaluation of myostatin-edited Meishan pigs by whole genome resequencing analyses. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2019;64(7):291-299. doi: 10.17221/7/2018-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Altshuler D.M., Durbin R.M., Abecasis G.R., Bentley D.R., Chakravarti A., Clark A.G. et al. (2012): An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Carlson D.F., Lancto C.A., Zang B., Kim E.S., Walton M. (2016): Production of hornless dairy cattle from genomeedited cell lines. Nature Biotechnology, 34, 479-481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Carroll D. (2011): Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics, 188, 773-782. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Choi J.W., Liao X., Park S., Jeon H.J., Chung W.H. (2013): Massively parallel sequencing of Chikso (Korean brindle cattle) to discover genome-wide SNPs and InDels. Molecules Cells, 36, 203-211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Choi J.W., Liao X., Stothard P., Chung W.H., Jeon H.J. (2014): Whole-genome analyses of Korean native and Holstein cattle breeds by massively parallel sequencing. PLoS ONE, 9, e101127. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Choi J.W., Chung W.H., Lee K.T., Cho E.S., Lee S.W. (2015): Whole-genome resequencing analyses of five pig breeds, including Korean wild and native, and three European origin breeds. DNA Research, 22, 259-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fan W.L., Ng C.S., Chen C.F., Lu M.Y., Chen Y.H. (2013): Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in two domestic chickens. Genome Biology and Evolution, 5, 1376-1392. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fang M., Hu X., Jiang T., Braunschweig M., Hu L. (2005): The phylogeny of Chinese indigenous pig breeds inferred from microsatellite markers. Animal Genetics, 36, 7-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gorodkin J., Cirera S., Hedegaard J., Gilchrist M.J., Panitz F. (2007): Porcine transcriptome analysis based on 97 nonnormalized cDNA libraries and assembly of 1,021,891 expressed sequence tags. Genome Biology, 8, R45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Grobet L., Martin L.J., Poncelet D., Pirottin D., Brouwers B. (1997): A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Genome Biology, 17, 71-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Jones H.D. (2015): Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing. Nature Plants, 1, 14011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kanis E., De Greef K.H., Hiemstra A., van Arendonk J.A. (2005): Breeding for societally important traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 948-957. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kerstens H.H., Kollers S., Kommadath A., Del Rosario M., Dibbits B. (2009): Mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms in pig genome sequence data. BMC Genomics, 10, 4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Laible G., Wei J., Wagner S. (2015): Improving livestock for agriculture - technological progress from random transgenesis to precision genome editing heralds a new era. Biotechnology Journal, 10, 109-120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ledford H. (2016): Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations. Nature, 532, 158-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Legault C. (1985): Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 33, 151-166.
  17. Li H., Durbin R. (2009): Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25, 1754-1760. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J. (2009): The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Lunney J.K. (2007): Advances in swine biomedical model genomics. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 3, 179-184. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Luo J., Song Z., Yu S., Cui D., Wang B. (2014): Efficient generation of myostatin (MSTN) biallelic mutations in cattle using zinc finger nucleases. PLoS ONE, 9, e95225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Mosher D.S., Quignon P., Bustamante C.D., Sutter N.B., Mellersh C.S. (2007): A mutation in the myostatin gene increases muscle mass and enhances racing performance in heterozygote dogs. PLoS Genetics, 3, e79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Qian L., Tang M., Yang J., Wang Q., Cai C. (2015): Targeted mutations in myostatin by zinc-finger nucleases result in double-muscled phenotype in Meishan pigs. Scientific Reports, 5, 14435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Rehfeldt C., Fiedler I., Dietl G., Ender K. (2000): Myogenesis and postnatal skeletal muscle cell growth as influenced by selection. Livestock Production Science, 66, 177-188. Go to original source...
  24. Schuelke M., Wagner K.R., Stolz L.E., Hubner C., Riebel T. (2004): Myostatin mutation associated with gross muscle hypertrophy in a child. New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2682-2688. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Stothard P., Choi J.W., Basu U., Sumner-Thomson J.M., Meng Y., Liao X., Moore S.S. (2011): Whole genome resequencing of black Angus and Holstein cattle for SNP and CNV discovery. BMC Genomics, 12, 559. Wang K., Li M., Hakonarson H. (2010): ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Walters E.M., Wolf E., Whyte J.J., Mao J., Renner S. (2012): sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research, 38, e164. Completion of the swine genome will simplify the production of swine as a large animal biomedical model. BMC Medical Genomics, 5, 55. Xiao G.J., Jiang S.W., Qian L.L., Cai C.B., Wang Q.Q. (2016): A 90-day feeding study in rats to assess the safety of genetically engineered pork. PLoS ONE, 11, e0165843.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.