Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2018, 63(9):339-346 | DOI: 10.17221/23/2017-CJAS

Placental characteristics of German Landrace sows and their relationships to different fertility parametersOriginal Paper

Andreas Vernunft*,1, Melanie Maass2, Klaus-Peter Brüssow3
1 Institute for Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
2 Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
3 Centre for Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Torun, Poland

The placenta is the central foetal organ that ensures a sufficient exchange of nutrients and metabolites for adequate foetal growth. Specific data profiles for placental characteristics from modern pig lines with high fertility and today's genetics are not currently available. This study focuses on describing the placental weight and size of German Landrace pigs and any subsequent relationship to litter number and important fertility parameters for these sows. As a basis for data collection, 55 litters from primi- and multiparous German Landrace sows with a total of 832 piglets were used. From these births, 766 placentas were recovered and weighed, with their lengths measured and the placental efficiency per litter also calculated. Mean placental weights ranged from 179 ± 60 to 422 ± 96 g between litters, and the mean length was between 61 ± 12 and 145 ± 19 cm. The placental efficiency was at a level of 5.1 ± 0.7. The investigated parameters were only slightly affected by the litter number (r = 0.3), and the means did not significantly differ between different litter numbers. With increasing litter size, the piglet weights and placental lengths were significantly decreased (r = -0.4 and r = -0.3), possibly due to limited uterine space. However, litter size had a strong positive correlation with the total litter placental weight (r = 0.7); therefore, in this study, the placental efficiency was not affected by a higher number of piglets per sow. Higher means for placental weights (r = 0.7) and lengths (r = 0.7) in a particular litter significantly improved the piglet birth weights. The reported variability in placental characteristics between litters suggests that there is an opportunity to selectively breed for improved piglet weight and homogeneity and thus improved piglet health and survival.

Keywords: pig; placenta; fecundity; placental efficiency; litter number; litter size

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vernunft A, Maass M, Brüssow K. Placental characteristics of German Landrace sows and their relationships to different fertility parameters. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2018;63(9):339-346. doi: 10.17221/23/2017-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Beaulieu A.D., Aalhus J.L., Williams N.H., Patience J.F. (2010): Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 2767-2778. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Biensen N.J., Wilson M.E., Ford S.P. (1998): The impact of either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterus on Meishan or Yorkshire fetal and placental development to days 70, 90, and 110 of gestation. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2169-2176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Biensen N.J., Wilson M.E., Ford S.P. (1999): The impacts of uterine environment and fetal genotype on conceptus size and placental vascularity during late gestation in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 954-959. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Borges V.F., Bernardi M.L., Bortolozzo F.P., Wentz I. (2005): Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummification in four Brazilian swine herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 70, 165-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bruessow K.-P., Waehner M. (2008): Biological potentials of fecundity of sows. Zuchtungskunde, 80, 370-377. (in German)
  6. de Jong E., Kauffold J., Engl S., Jourquin J., Maes D. (2013): Effect of a GnRH analogue (Maprelin) on the reproductive performance of gilts and sows. Theriogenology, 80, 870-877. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dourmad J.-Y., Noblet J., Pere M.C., Etienne M. (1999): Mating, pregnancy and prenatal growth. In: Kyriazakis I. (ed.): A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 129-151.
  8. Fischer K., Brussow K.P., Schlegel H., Wahner M. (2011): Cluster analysis as a tool to assess litter size in conjunction with the amount of embryonic and fetal losses in pigs. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27, 785-790. Go to original source...
  9. Ford S.P., Vonnahme K.A., Wilson M.E. (2002): Uterine capacity in the pig reflects a combination of uterine environment and conceptus genotype effects. Journal of Animal Science, 80, E66-E73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Freking B.A., Leymaster J.L., Vallet J.L., Christenson R.K. (2007): Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 2093-2103. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Freking B.A., Lents C.A., Vallet J.L. (2016): Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 167, 16-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Johnson R.K., Nielsen M.K., Casey D.S. (1999): Responses in ovulation rate, embryo survival and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 541-557. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Knight J.W., Bazer F.W., Thatcher W.W., Franke D.E., Wallace H.D. (1977): Conceptus development in intact and unilaterally hysterectomized-ovariectomized gilts: interrelations among hormonal status, placental development, fetal fluids and fetal growth. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 620-637. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Mesa H., Safranski T.J., Cammack K.M., Weaber R.L., Lamberson W.R. (2006): Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 32-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Mesa H., Cammack K.M., Safranski T.J., Green J.A., Lamberson W.R. (2012): Selection for placental efficiency in swine: conceptus development. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 4217-4222. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Noblet J., Closet W.H., Heavens R.P. (1985): Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. 1. Uterus and mammary tissue development. British Journal of Nutrition, 53, 251-265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pere M.C., Etienne M. (2000): Uterine blood flow in sows: effects of pregnancy stage and litter size. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 40, 369-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Rootwelt V., Reksen O., Farstad W., Framstad T. (2014): Postpartum deaths: piglet, placental, and umbilical characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 2647-2656. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Tummaruk P., Kesdangsakonwut S. (2014): Uterine size in replacement gilts associated with age, body weight, growth rate, and reproductive status. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 511-518. Go to original source...
  20. Vallet J.L., Freking B.A. (2006): Changes in fetal organ weights during gestation after selection for ovulation rate and uterine capacity in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2338-2345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Vallet J.L., Klemcke H.G., Christenson R.K. (2002): Interrelationships among conceptus size, uterine protein secretion, fetal erythropoiesis, and uterine capacity. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 729-737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Vonnahme K.A., Ford S.P. (2003): Selection for above-average placental efficiency increased placental expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor system in pigs. Biology of Reproduction, 68 (Suppl. 1), 205.
  23. Waehner M., Huehn U. (2016): 80 years periodic farrowing systems in piglet production in Germany - A review: 1. Production systems for group farrowing from 1990 to present time. Zuchtungskunde, 88, 353-370.
  24. Wilson M.E., Biensen N.J., Youngs C.R., Ford S.P. (1998): Development of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term. Biology of Reproduction, 58, 905-910. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Wilson M.E., Biensen N., Ford S.P. (1999): Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs using placental efficiency as a selection tool. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 1654-1658. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wu M.C., Chen Z.Y., Jarrell V.L., Dziuk P.J. (1989): Effect of initial length of uterus per embryo on fetal survival and development in the pig. Journal of Animal Science, 67, 1767-1772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Zhang T., Wang L.-G., Shi H.-B., Yan H., Zhang L.-C., Liu X., Pu L., Liang J., Zhang Y.-B., Zhao K.-B., Wang L.-X. (2016): Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of litter uniformity and litter size in Large White sows. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15, 848-854. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.