Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2018, 63(5):182-187 | DOI: 10.17221/113/2017-CJAS

Negative effect of phytase superdosing in laying hensOriginal Paper

Miloš Skřivan*, Michaela Englmaierová, Věra Skřivanová
Department of Nutrition Physiology and Animal Product Quality, Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic

Hisex hens, aged 24 weeks, were divided into 6 groups. Each group consisted of 4 cages with 10 hens per cage with dimensions and equipment meeting the EU directives. This 2 × 3 factorial experiment included two levels of calcium (Ca; 35 or 42 g/kg) and 3 different additions of 6-phytase OptiPhos® (Ph; 0, 300, and 1500 phytase units (FTU)/kg) to the diet. The content of nonphytate phosphorus (NPP) in all diets was the same (1.8 g/kg). The experiment lasted 12 weeks. A significant interaction of Ph × Ca (P = 0.029) was observed in hen-day egg production. A diet with 35 g/kg Ca and the highest dose of Ph (1500 FTU/kg) resulted in a lower hen-day egg production (84.1%) than did the other treatments (91.5-88.6%). Phytase superdosing negatively influenced egg mass production (P = 0.001) and the feed conversion ratio (P = 0.018). Neither Ph nor Ca influenced eggshell ash content. Both additions of Ph into mixed feed decreased Haugh units (P < 0.001). A higher content of Ca in the diet increased shell thickness (P = 0.024) and shell breaking strength (P = 0.039), while Ph addition increased shell percentage (P = 0.004) and shell breaking strength (P = 0.009). The results of this experiment demonstrate the unsuitability of Ph superdosing in mixed feed for laying hens.

Keywords: Hisex; dietary calcium; OptiPhos®; performance

Published: May 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Skřivan M, Englmaierová M, Skřivanová V. Negative effect of phytase superdosing in laying hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2018;63(5):182-187. doi: 10.17221/113/2017-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. AOAC (2005): Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th Ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, USA.
  2. Camden B.J., Morel P.C.H., Thomas D.V., Ravindran V., Bedford M.R. (2001): Effectiveness of exogenous microbial phytase in improving the bioavailabilities of phosphorus and other nutrients in maize-soybean meal diets for broilers. Animal Science Journal, 73, 289-297. Go to original source...
  3. Council Directive (1999): Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 203, 53-57.
  4. Cowieson A.J., Wilcock P., Bedford M.R. (2011): Super-dosing effects of phytase in poultry and other monogastrics. Worlds's Poultry Science Journal, 67, 225-236. Go to original source...
  5. Dersjant-Li Y., Awati A., Schulze H., Partridge G. (2015): Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: a critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95, 878-896. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Dilger R.N., Onyango E.M., Sands J.S., Adeola O. (2004): Evaluation of microbial phytase in broiler diets. Poultry Science, 83, 962-970. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Duskova D., Marounek M., Brezina P. (2001): Determination of phytic acid in feeds and faeces of pigs and poultry by capillary isotachophoresis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81, 36-41. Go to original source...
  8. Eeckhout W., De Paepe M. (1994): Total phosphorus, phytate phosphorus and phytase activity in plant feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 47, 19-29. Go to original source...
  9. EFSA (2013): Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Quantum® Blue (6-phytase) as a feed additive for laying hens and minor laying poultry species. EFSA Journal, 3343, 1-10. Go to original source...
  10. Englmaierova M., Skrivanova V., Skrivan M. (2014): The effect of non-phytase phosphorus and phytase levels on performance, egg and tibia quality, and pH of the digestive tract in hens fed higher-calcium-content diets. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 107-115. Go to original source...
  11. Haugh R.R. (1937): The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg and Poultry Magazine, 43, 552-555, 572-573.
  12. Kim J.H., Pitargue F.M., Jung H., Han G.P., Choi H.S., Kil D.Y. (2017): Effect of superdosing phytase on productive performance and egg quality of laying hens. AsianAustralasian Journal of Animal Science, 30, 994-998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Manobhavan M., Elangovan A.V., Sridhar M., Shet M., Ajith D., Pal D.T., Gowda N.K.S. (2016): Effect of super dosing of phytase on growth performance, ileal digestibility and bone characteristics in broilers fed corn-soyabased diets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 100, 93-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.