Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2017, 62(11):491-500 | DOI: 10.17221/12/2017-CJAS

Pilot experiment in chickens challenged with Campylobacter jejuni CCM6191 administered enterocin M-producing probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium CCM8558 to check its protective effectOriginal Paper

Andrea Laukova*,1, Monika Pogany Simonova1, Ivana Kubasova1, Sona Gancarcikova2, Iveta Placha1, Jana Scerbova1, Viera Revajova2, Robert Herich2, Mikulas Levkut Sn.2, Viola Strompfova1
1 Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic
2 University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic

Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most common food-borne pathogens and chickens are the main source of these bacteria. Enterococcus faecium AL41, enterocin M-producing strain (deponed to the Czech Culture Collection of Microorganisms, Brno, Czech Republic - CCM8558) is our isolate previously applied e.g. in broiler rabbits with beneficial effect. In this study it was used in a 11-day experiment with chickens (1-day-old, breed Cobb 500, n = 40) challenged with C. jejuni. Birds had free access to feed and water; they were randomly divided into four groups per 10 chicks each: control (CG), E. faecium CCM8558 (EG1), CCM8558 + C. jejuni CCM6191 (EG2), CCM6191 (EG3). E. faecium CCM8558 (109 CFU/ml, 200 µl) in Ringer solution was administered daily per os to EG1 and EG2 for 7 days (from day 0-1). EG3 and EG2 were infected individually per os (day 4, CCM6191, 108 CFU/ml in Ringer solution, 200 µl). For microbiota evaluation, faecal mixtures (n = 5) were sampled on day 0-1 (1st sampling), on day 7 (2nd sampling), and on day 11 (3rd sampling) (day 7 of CCM8558 application, day 4 post-infection; day 4 of CCM8558 cessation, day 7 post-infection). Five birds from each group were sacrificed. CCM8558 sufficiently colonized chickens. In faeces of EG2 a tendency to reduce Campylobacter spp. (day 7 of application, day 4 of infection) was noted compared to EG2 (day 11, day 4 of cessation, day 7 post-infection; difference 1.21 log cycles), while in EG3 CCM6191 strain was not reduced. Phagocytic activity (PA) values were significantly higher in infected groups compared to CG and EG1. A significant increase in PA was also noted in EG2 and EG3 at the end of experiment compared to CG or EG1. The strain additive did not evoke oxidative stress. Biochemical parameters were influenced to the reference levels.

Keywords: enterococci; effect; chick; microbiota; physiological parameters; Campylobacter challenge

Published: November 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Laukova A, Pogany Simonova M, Kubasova I, Gancarcikova S, Placha I, Scerbova J, et al.. Pilot experiment in chickens challenged with Campylobacter jejuni CCM6191 administered enterocin M-producing probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium CCM8558 to check its protective effect. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2017;62(11):491-500. doi: 10.17221/12/2017-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alatoom A.A., Cinnigham S.A., Ihde S.M., Mandrekar J., Patel R. (2011): Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of Gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 49, 2868-2873. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bovdisova I., Capcarova M. (2015): Effect of a probiotic product on the content of cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood serum of laying hens. In: Proc. Conf. Young Scientists, Nitra, Slovak Republic, 42-45. (in Slovak)
  3. Cisek A.A., Binek M. (2014): Chicken intestinal microbiota function with a special emphasis on the role of probiotic bacteria. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 17, 385-394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. EFSA (2015): EU summary report on zoonozes, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks 2013. EFSA Journal, 13: 3991. Go to original source...
  5. Franz C.M.A.P., van Belkum M.J., Holzapfel W.H., Abriouel H., Galvez A. (2007): Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiology Review, 31, 293-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Herich R., Laukova A., Strompfova V., Revajova V., Levkut M., Pistl J. (2004): Optimalization of Salmonella detection in chickens' caecum using PCR method. Archiv fur Tierzucht, 47, 85-91. Go to original source...
  7. Karaffova V., Marcinkova E., Bobikova K., Herich R., Revajova V., Stasova D., Kavulova A., Levkutova M., Levkut Jr. M., Laukova A., Sevcikova Z., Levkut Sr. M. (2017): TLR4 and TLR21 expression, MIF, IFN-β, MID-2, CD14 activation, and sIgA production in chickens administered with EFAL41 strain challenged with Campylobacter jejuni. Folia Microbiologica, 62, 89-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Laukova A., Czikkova S., Vasilkova Z., Juris P., Marekova M. (1998): Occurrence of bacteriocin production among environmental enterococci. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 27, 178-182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Laukova A., Guba P., Nemcova R., Vasilkova Z. (2003a): Reduction of Salmonella in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK13 strain of Enterococcus faecium. Veterinary Research Communication, 27, 275-280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Laukova A., Turek P., Marekova M., Nagy J. (2003b): Use of ent M, new variant of ent P to control Listeria innocua in experimentally contaminated Gombasek sausage. Archiv für Lebensmittelhygiene, 54, 25-48.
  11. Laukova A., Guba P., Nemcova R., Marekov M. (2004a): Inhibition of Salmonella enterica serovar Duesseldorf by enterocin A in gnotobiotic Japanese quails. Veterinary Medicine - Czech, 49, 47-51. Go to original source...
  12. Laukova A., Strompfova V., Ouwehand A. (2004b): Adhesion properties of enterococci to intestinal mucus of different hosts. Veterinary Research Communications, 28, 647-655. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Laukova A., Chrastinova L., Pogany Simonova M., Strompfova V., Placha I., Cobanova K., Formelova Z., Chrenkova M., Ondruska L. (2012): Enterococcus faecium AL41: its Enterocin M and their beneficial use in rabbits husbandry. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 4, 243-249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Laukova A., Strompfova V., Placha I., Cobanova K., Faix S., Pogany Simonova M. (2015): Beneficial effect of enterocin M-producing, probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium AL41 in model experiment with hens. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research, 31, 206-213.
  15. Laukova A., Pogany Simonova M., Chrastinova L., Placha I., Cobanova K., Formelova Z., Chrenkova M., Ondruska L., Strompfova V. (2016): Benefits of combinative application of probiotic, enterocin M-producing strain Enterococcus faecium AL41 and Eleutherococcus senticosus in rabbits. Folia Microbiologica, 61, 169-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Laukova A., Pogany Simonova M., Chrastinova L., Kandricakova A., Scerbova J., Placha I., Cobanova K., Formelova Z., Ondruska L., Strkolcova G., Strompfova V. (2017): Beneficial effect of bacteriocin strain Enterococcus durans ED26E/7 in model experiment using broiler rabbits. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 62, 168-177. Go to original source...
  17. Levkut Jr. M., Revajova V., Kraffova V., Laukova A., Herich R., Strompfova V., Sevcikova Z., Zitnan R., Levkutova M., Levkut Sn. M. (2016): Evaluation of mucin and cytokines expression with intraepithelial lymphocytes determination in the caecum of broilers administered with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis SE147. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 8, 214-222. Go to original source...
  18. Levkut Jr. M., Revajova V., Kraffova V., Laukova A., Herich R., Strompfova V., Sevcikova Z., Zitnan R., Levkutova M., Levkut Sn. M. (2016): Evaluation of mucin and cytokines expression with intraepithelial lymphocytes determination in the caecum of broilers administered with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis SE147. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 8, 214-222. Go to original source...
  19. Levkut M., Revajova V., Laukova A., Sevcikova Z., Spisakova V., Faixova Z., Levkutova M., Strompfova V., Pistl J., Levkut M. (2012): Leucocytic responses and intestinal mucin dynamics of broilers protected with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis. Research in Veterinary Science, 93, 195-201. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Mangiapane E., Pessione A., Pessione E. (2014): Selenium and selenoproteins: an overview on different biological systems. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 15, 598-607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Marekova M., Laukova A., Skaugen M., Nes I.F. (2007): Isolation and characterization of a new bacteriocin, termed Enterocin M, produced by environmental isolate Enterococcus faecium AL41. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 34, 533-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Novak R., Bogovic Matijasic B., Tercic D., Cervek M., Gorjanc G., Holcman A., Levart A., Rogelj I. (2011): Effect of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat type chickens. Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95, 424-433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Ohland C.L., MacNaughton W.K. (2010): Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 298, 807-819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Pogany Simonova M., Laukova A., Placha I., Cobanova K., Strompfova V., Szaboova R., Chrastinova L. (2013): Can enterocins affect phagocytosis and glutathioneperoxidase in rabbits? Central European Journal of Biology, 8, 730-734.
  25. Sahin H.E., Zhang Q., Meitzler J.C., Harr B.S., Morishita T.Y., Mohan R. (2001): Prevalence, antigen specificity and bactericidal activity of poultry anti-Campylobacter maternal antibodies. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 67, 3951-3957. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Scerbova J., Laukova A. (2016): Sensitivity to enterocins of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from different poultry species. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 13, 668-673. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Shang L., Fukata M., Thirunarayanan N., Martin A.P., Arnaboldi P., Maussag D., Berin C., Unkeless J.C., Mayer L., Abreu M.T., Lira S.A. (2008): TLR signaling in small intestinal epithelium promotes B cell recruitment and IgA production in lamina propria. Gastroenterology, 135, 529-538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Stasova D., Husakova E., Bobikova K., Karaffova V., Levkutova M., Levkut M. (2015): Expression of cytokines in chicken peripheral blood mononuclear cells after stimulation by probiotic bacteria and Campylobacter jejuni in vitro. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 26, 813-820. Go to original source...
  29. Szaboova R., Laukova A., Chrastinova L., Pogany Simonova M., Strompfova V., Placha I., Cobanova K., Vasilkova Z., Chrenkova M. (2011): Enterocin 4231 produced by Enterococcus faecium CCM4231 and its use in rabbits. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 61, 523-539. Go to original source...
  30. Vetvicka V., Fornusek J., Kopecek J., Kaminkova J., Kasparek L., Vranova M. (1982): Phagocytosis of human blood leucocytes: a simple micromethod. Immunological Letters, 5, 97-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Woodford N., Egelton M.C., Morrison D. (1997): Comparison of PCR with phenotypic methods for the speciation of enterococci. Advances in Experimental Medicine, 418, 405-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.