Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2016, 61(4):159-171 | DOI: 10.17221/8847-CJAS

Genetic characterization of introduced Tunisian and French populations of pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) by species-specific microsatellites and mitochondrial haplotypesOriginal Paper

M. Louati1, K. Kohlmann2, O.K. Ben Hassine1, P. Kersten2, N. Poulet3, L. Bahri-Sfar1
1 Research Unit of Integrative Biology and Evolutionary and Functional Ecology of Aquatic Environments, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, El Manar, Tunisia
2 Department of Ecophysiology and Aquaculture, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
3 French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environment (Onema), Vincennes, France

The pike-perch is among the economically most valuable fish species for both commercial and recreational fishermen. This could be seen as the main reason for its introductions into Western Europe (including France) and Tunisia. Knowledge of the genetic structure of the introduced populations is a prerequisite for their successful long-term management. The present study focuses on the genetic characterization of introduced Tunisian and French pike-perch populations using species-specific microsatellite loci and mitochondrial cytochrome b haplotypes in order to better understand their genetic relationships and to try to trace the origin of the Tunisian populations. Lowered levels of genetic diversity have been observed in the two introduced Tunisian populations and a farmed Czech strain compared to a native wild German population. The reduction of microsatellite genetic variability of these three populations was supported by a genetic bottleneck signature. In contrast, the French populations showed high genetic diversity, probably due to multiple introductions and admixture of genetically differing sources. A high genetic differentiation level (significant FST values) between most pike-perch populations and a high average accuracy of self-assignments of individuals to populations of their origin were observed, probably resulting from genetic drift. The average pairwise relatedness values and results of the structure analysis highlighted a closer relationship between Tunisian and French populations than between Tunisian and German ones. Indeed, the two Tunisian populations clustered together with the French populations on a Neighbour-Joining tree based on DA genetic distances. This was also sustained by the distribution of cytochrome b haplotypes A and B in the studied populations. The present results demonstrate that, despite the genetic differences, the studied populations cluster according to their phylogeographic origin. The Tunisian populations seem to be introduced from a French hatchery where the brood stock had the haplotype B of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene.

Keywords: zander; nuclear markers; cytochrome b; stocking; North Africa; Europe

Published: April 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Louati M, Kohlmann K, Ben Hassine OK, Kersten P, Poulet N, Bahri-Sfar L. Genetic characterization of introduced Tunisian and French populations of pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) by species-specific microsatellites and mitochondrial haplotypes. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2016;61(4):159-171. doi: 10.17221/8847-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Allendorf F.W., Lundquist L.L. (2003): Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conservation Biology, 17, 24-30. Go to original source...
  2. Bahri-Sfar L., Lemaire C., Chatain B., Divanach P., Ben Hassine O.K., Bonhomme F. (2005): Impact of aquaculture on the genetic structure of Mediterranean populations of Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquatic Living Resources, 18, 71-76. (in French) Go to original source...
  3. Belkhir K., Borsa P., Chikhi L., Raufaste N., Bonhomme F. (1996): GENETIX 4.05, WindowsTM software for population genetics. Laboratoire génome, populations, interactions, CNRS UMR, 5000, 1996-2004. (in French)
  4. Bjorklund M., Aho T., Larsson L. (2007): Genetic differentiation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca): the relative importance of gene flow, drift and common history. Journal of Fish Biology, 71, 264-278. Go to original source...
  5. Cornuet J.-M., Luikart G. (1996): Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144, 2001-2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cornuet J.-M., Piry S., Luikart G., Estoup A., Solignac M. (1999): New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153, 1989-2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Eschbach E., Nolte A.W., Kohlmann K., Kersten P., Kail J., Arlinghaus R. (2014): Population differentiation of zander (Sander lucioperca) across native and newly colonized ranges suggests increasing admixture in the course of an invasion. Evolutionary Applications, 7, 555-568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Felsenstein J. (1993): Phylogeny Inference Package (PHYLIP). Version 3.5. University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
  9. Jakobsson M., Rosenberg N.A. (2007): CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics, 23, 1801-1806. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kalinowski S.T. (2005): hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 187-189. Go to original source...
  11. Kalinowski S.T., Wagner A.P., Taper M.L. (2006): ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 576-579. Go to original source...
  12. Khurshut E., Kohlmann K. (2009): Application of nine speciesspecific microsatellite loci to characterize three pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) populations from the Aral Sea basin in Uzbekistan. Environmental Biotechnology, 5, 3-10.
  13. Kohlmann K., Kersten P. (2008): Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci from the pike-perch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758). Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 1085-1087. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kohlmann K., Kersten P. (2013): Deeper insight into the origin and spread of European common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) based on mitochondrial D-loop sequence polymorphisms. Aquaculture, 376-379, 97-104. Go to original source...
  15. Kohlmann K., Kersten P., Flajshans M. (2005): Microsatellite-based genetic variability and differentiation of domesticated, wild and feral common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations. Aquaculture, 247, 253-266. Go to original source...
  16. Kohlmann K., Louati M., Kersten P., Bahri-Sfar L., Poulet N., Ben Hassine O. (2013): Detection of two major cytochrome b lineages in pike-perch, Sander lucioperca, and first data on their distribution in European populations. Environmental Biotechnology, 9, 1-5.
  17. Lappalainen J., Dorner H., Wysujack K. (2003): Reproduction biology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) - a review. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 12, 95-106. Go to original source...
  18. Nei M., Tajima F., Tateno Y. (1983): Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 19, 153-170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Page R. (2001): TreeView 1.4 Software. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  20. Piry S., Luikart G., Cornuet J.-M. (1999): BOTTLENECK: A program for detecting recent effective population size reductions from allele data frequencies. Available at http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/software/Bottleneck/bottleneck.html (accessed Dec 10, 2014).
  21. Poulet N., Balaresque P., Aho T., Bjorklund M. (2009): Genetic structure and dynamics of a small introduced population: the pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, in the Rhône delta. Genetica, 135, 77-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Reynolds J., Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. (1983): Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics, 105, 767-779. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Rosenberg N.A. (2004): DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 137-138. Go to original source...
  25. Saisa M., Salminen M., Koljonen M.L., Ruuhijarvi J. (2010): Coastal and freshwater pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) populations differ genetically in the Baltic Sea basin. Hereditas, 147, 205-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Szpiech Z.A., Jakobsson M., Rosenberg N.A. (2008): ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics, 24, 2498-2504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011): MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731-2739. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P., Shipley P. (2004): MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538. Go to original source...
  29. Verspoor E. (1988): Reduced genetic variability in first-generation hatchery populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 1686-1690. Go to original source...
  30. Wagner A., Creel S., Kalinowski S. (2006): Estimating relatedness and relationships using microsatellite loci with null alleles. Heredity, 97, 336-345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. (1984): Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.