Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 59(4):182-189 | DOI: 10.17221/7342-CJAS

Estimation of additive and dominance variance for litter size components in rabbitsOriginal Paper

I. Nagy1, J. Farkas2, I. Curik3, G. Gorjanc4, P. Gyovai1, Zs. Szendrő1
1 Faculty of Animal Science, Kaposvár University, Kaposvár, Hungary
2 Faculty of Economic Science, Kaposvár University, Kaposvár, Hungary
3 Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
4 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Domzale, Slovenia

Additive, dominance, and permanent environmental variance components were estimated for the number of kits born alive, number of kits born dead, and total number of kits born of a synthetic rabbit line (called Pannon Ka). The data file consisted of 11 582 kindling records of 2620 does collected between the years 1996-2013. The total number of animals in the pedigree files was 4012. The examined traits were evaluated using single-trait and two-trait (number of kits born alive-dead) animal models containing all or part of the following effects: additive genetic effects, permanent environmental effects, dominance effects. Heritability estimates calculated using the basic single-trait and two-trait models were 0.094 ± 0.018 and 0.090 ± 0.016 for number of kits born alive, 0.037 ± 0.010 and 0.041 ± 0.012 for number of kits born dead, and 0.117 ± 0.018 for total number of kits born, respectively. The relative significance of permanent environmental effects was 0.069 ± 0.014 and 0.069 ± 0.012 for number of kits born alive, 0.025 ± 0.011 and 0.023 ± 0.010 for number of kits born dead, and 0.060 ± 0.013 for total number of kits born, respectively. Using the extended single-trait and two-trait models, the ratios of the dominance components compared to the phenotypic variances were 0.048 ± 0.008 and 0.046 ± 0.007 for number of kits born alive, 0.068 ± 0.006 and 0.065 ± 0.006 for number of kits born dead, and 0.005 ± 0.0073 for total number of kits born, respectively. Genetic correlation coefficients between number of kits born alive and number of kits born dead were 0.401 ± 0.171 and 0.521 ± 0.182, respectively. Spearman's rank correlations between the breeding values of the different single-trait models were close to unity in all traits (0.992-0.990). Much lower breeding value stability was found for two-trait models (0.384-0.898), especially for number of kits born dead. Results showed that the dominance components for number of kits born alive and number of kits born dead were not zero and affected the ranking of the animals (based on the breeding values).

Keywords: REML analysis; dominance effects; family class effect; genetic parameters

Published: April 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nagy I, Farkas J, Curik I, Gorjanc G, Gyovai P, Szendrő Z. Estimation of additive and dominance variance for litter size components in rabbits. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014;59(4):182-189. doi: 10.17221/7342-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Cockerham C.C. (1954): An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics, 39, 859-882. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Culbertson M.S., Mabry J.W., Misztal I., Bertrand J.K. (1997): Effects of inbreeding and outbreeding in purebred Hampshire and Duroc Swine. The Professional Animal Scientist, 13, 194-197. Go to original source...
  3. Culbertson M.S., Mabry J.W., Misztal I., Gengler N., Bertrand J.K., Varona L. (1998): Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 448-451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gallardo F.A., Lhorente J.P., Neira R. (2010): The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (Oncorchynchus kisutch). Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hoeschele I., VanRaden P. (1991): Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire-dam subclass effects. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 557-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Lutaaya E., Misztal I., Mabry J.W., Short T., Timm H.H., Holzbauer R. (2001): Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 3002-3007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mantovani R., Sartori A., Mezzadri M., Lenarduzzi M. (2008): Genetics of maternal traits in a new synthetic rabbit line under selection. In: Proc. 9 th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italy, 169-174.
  8. Mielenz N., Kovac M., Groeneveld E., Presinger R., Schmutz M., Schüler L. (2003): Genetische Parameter für Merkmale der Eiproduction Geschätzt mit Additiven und Dominanzmodellen bei Legehennen. Archiv für Tierzucht, 46, 77-84. Go to original source...
  9. Mielenz N., Noor R.R., Schüler L. (2006): Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic variances of body weight, egg weight and egg production for quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) with an animal model. Archiv für Tierzucht, 49, 300-307. Go to original source...
  10. Misztal I. (2001): New Models and Computations in Animal Breeding. 50 th Annual National Breeders Roundtable (Poultry Science Association), St. Louis, USA, 32-42.
  11. Nagy I., Radnai I., Nagyné-Kiszlinger H., Farkas J., Szendrő Zs. (2011): Genetic parameters and genetic trends of reproduction traits in synthetic Pannon rabbits using repeatability and multi-trait animal models. Archiv für Tierzucht, 54, 297-307. Go to original source...
  12. Nagy I., Gorjanc G., Curik I., Farkas J., Kiszlinger H., Szendrő Zs. (2013): The contribution of dominance and inbreeding depression in estimating variance components for litter size in Pannon White rabbits. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 130, 303-311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Norris D., Varona L., Visser D.P., Theron H.E., Voordewind S.F., Nesamvuni E.A. (2006): Estimation of the additive and dominance variances in South African Landrace pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science, 36, 261-268.
  14. Norris D., Varona L., Ngambi J.W., Visser D.P., Mbajiorgu C.A., Voordewind S.F. (2010): Estimation of the additive and dominance variances in SA Duroc pigs. Livestock Science, 131, 144-147. Go to original source...
  15. Piles M., Garcia M.L., Rafel O., Ramon J., Baselga M. (2006): Genetics of litter size in three maternal lines of rabbits: Repeatability versus multiple-trait models. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2309-2315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ragab M., Baselga M. (2011): A comparison of reproductive traits of four maternal lines of rabbits selected for litter size at weaning and founded on different criteria. Livestock Science, 136, 201-206. Go to original source...
  17. Roff D.A., Emerson K. (2006): Epistasis and dominance: evidence for differential effects in life-history versus morphological traits. Evolution, 60, 1981-1990. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Rye M., Mao I.L. (1998): Nonadditive genetic effects on growth rate in Atlantic salmon. Livestock Production Science, 57, 15-22. Go to original source...
  19. Serenius T., Stalder K.J., Puonti M. (2006): Impact of dominance effects on sow longevity. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 123, 355-361. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Toro M.A., Varona L. (2010): A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Varona L., Misztal I., Bertrand J.K., Lawor T.J. (1998): Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 1126-1135. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Wei M., van der Werf J.H. (1993): Animal model estimation of additive and dominance variances in egg production traits of poultry. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 57-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Winkelman A.M., Peterson R.G. (1994): Genetic parameters (heritabilities, dominance ratios and genetic correlations) for body weight and length of Chinook salmon after 9 and 22 months of saltwater rearing. Aquaculture, 125, 31-36. Go to original source...
  24. Wolf J., Peškovičová D., Groeneveld E. (2001): Stability of genetic parameter estimates for production traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 118, 161-172. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.