Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2013, 58(3):136-145 | DOI: 10.17221/6670-CJAS
Testing different single nucleotide polymorphism selection strategies for prediction of genomic breeding values in dairy cattle based on low density panelsOriginal Paper
- 1 Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
- 2 National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice, Poland
- 3 Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
In human and animal genetics dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels are widely used to describe genetic variation. In particular genomic selection in dairy cattle has become a routinely applied tool for prediction of additive genetic values of animals, especially of young selection candidates. The aim of the study was to investigate how well an additive genetic value can be predicted using various sets of approximately 3000 SNPs selected out of the 54 001 SNPs in an Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip high density panel. Effects of SNPs from the nine subsets of the 54 001 panel were estimated using a model with a random uncorrelated SNPs effect based on a training data set of 1216 Polish Holstein-Friesian bulls whose phenotypic records were approximated by deregressed estimated breeding values for milk, protein, and fat yields. Predictive ability of the low density panels was assessed using a validation data set of 622 bulls. Correlations between direct and conventional breeding values routinely estimated for the Polish population were similar across traits and clearly across sets of SNPs. For the training data set correlations varied between 0.94 and 0.98, for the validation data set between 0.25 and 0.46. The corresponding correlations estimated using the 54 001 panel were: 0.98 for the three traits (training), 0.98 (milk and fat yields, validation), and 0.97 (protein yield, validation). The optimal subset consisted of SNPs selected based on their highest effects for milk yield obtained from the evaluation of all 54 001 SNPs. A low density SNP panel allows for reasonably good prediction of future breeding values. Even though correlations between direct and conventional breeding values were moderate, for young selection candidates a low density panel is a better predictor than a commonly used average of parental breeding values.
Keywords: 3K chip; genomic selection; prediction; single nucleotide polymorphism
Published: March 31, 2013 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Calus M.P.L. (2010): Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal, 4, 157-164.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Calus M.P.L, Veerkamp R.F. (2007): Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 124, 362-368.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Daetwyler H.D., Pong-Wong R., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. (2010): The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics, 185, 1021-1031.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dassonneville R., Fritz S., Ducrocq V., Boichard D. (2012): Short communication: Imputation performances of 3 low-density marker panels in beef and dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 4136-4140.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. (2007): The impact of genetic relationship information on genomeassisted breeding values. Genetics, 177, 2389-2397.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. (2009): Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics, 182, 343-353.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Habier D., Tetens J., Seefried F.R., Lichtner P., Thaller G. (2010): The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution, 19, 42-45.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.C., Verbyla K., Goddard M.E. (2008): Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genetics Selection Evolution, 24, 41-51.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. (2009): Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 433-443.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hu Z.L., Fritz E.R., Reecy J.M. (2007): AnimalQTLdb: a livestock QTL database tool set for positional QTL information mining and beyond. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D604-D609.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Jairath L., Dekkers J.C.M., Schaeffer L.R., Liu Z., Burnside E.B., Kolstad B. (1998): Genetic evaluation for herd life in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 550-562.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Legarra A., Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2009): A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4656-4663.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Liu Z., Seefried F.R., Reinhardt F., Rensing S., Thaller G., Reents R. (2011): Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution, 43, 19.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. (2001): Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157, 1819-1829.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Moser G., Tier B., Crump R.E., Khatkar M.S., Raadsma H.W. (2009): A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genetics Selection Evolution, 41, 56.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Muir W.M. (2007): Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 124, 342-355.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mulder H.A., Calus M.P.L., Druet T., Schrooten C. (2012): Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 876-889.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Purcell S., Neale B., Todd-Brown K., Thomas L., Ferreira M.A.R., Bender D., Maller J., Sklar P., de Bakker P.I.W., Daly M.J., Sham P.C. (2007): PLINK: a toolset for wholegenome association and population-based linkage analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 559-575.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Strabel T., Szyda J., Ptak E., Jamrozik J. (2005): Comparison of random regression test-day models for Polish Black and White Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 3688-3699.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- VanRaden P.M., VanTassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. (2009): Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 16-24.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Vazquez A.I., Rosa G.J.M., Weigel K.A., de los Campos G., Gianola D., Allison D.B. (2010): Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 5942-5949.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.