Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2010, 55(1):42-47 | DOI: 10.17221/19/2009-CJAS

Effect of preventive application of Enterococcus faecium EF55 on intestinal mucosa during salmonellosis in chickens

R. Herich1, T. Kokinčáková2, A. Lauková3, M. Levkutová2
1 Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic
2 Institute of Epizootology and Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic
3 Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic

In the present study the effect of preventive application of Enterococcus faecium EF 55 on the intestinal mucosa was evaluated in experimentally infected chickens with Salmonella enterica subsp. Enteritidis. A total of 120, one-day-old Salmonella-free chickens of Isa Brown hybrid were divided into 4 groups. The chickens in groups E and ES were perorally inoculated with E. faecium EF55 in a dose of 1 × 109 CFU/ml for 7 consecutive days. Placebo was applied to birds in control group C and group S during the first 7 days of life. At the age of 8 days chickens in groups ES and S were perorally infected with S. enterica subsp. Enteritidis phage type 4 in a dose of 1 × 108 CFU/ml. In birds treated with E. faecium EF 55 (group ES) a decreased number of Salmonella spp. positive individuals was recorded from 28.5% 2 days post infection (p.i.) to 10% 14 days p.i. when the difference between group ES and group with the application of Salmonella Enteritidis alone (group S) was significant (P < 0.01). On the contrary, in birds of group S the percentage of Salmonella spp. positive animals showed no constant changes. It increased from 12.5% 2 days p.i. to 37.5% 4 days p.i. The maximum of positive samples 83.3% was found 14 days p.i. The application of E. faecium EF55 reduced colonisation of caeca and minimized translocation of salmonellae into the liver and spleen. Two days p.i. the shortest villi in the jejunum were observed in group S - 1 266.2 µm, when compared to group E with the highest jejunal villi - 1 605 µm (P < 0.05). The growth of the villi was observed 14 days p.i. in all groups except group S. The early exposition of chickens to E. faecium EF55 led to more rapid development of intestinal villi when compared to the untreated control (P < 0.05). Reduced colonisation of the intestinal tract by salmonellae in birds treated with E. faecium EF 55 also preserved the microenvironment of the intestine from harmful effects of the pathogen.

Keywords: Enterococcus faecium; Salmonella spp.; PCR; villi; chickens

Published: January 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Herich R, Kokinčáková T, Lauková A, Levkutová M. Effect of preventive application of Enterococcus faecium EF55 on intestinal mucosa during salmonellosis in chickens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2010;55(1):42-47. doi: 10.17221/19/2009-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Asheg A.A., Levkut M., Revajová V., Ševčíková Z., Kolodzieyski L., Pistl J., Pilipčinec E. (2003): Spreading of Salmonella enteritidis in the cecum of chickens. Folia Microbiologica, 48, 277-279. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Audisio C.M., Oliver G., Apella M.C. (2000): Protective effect of Enterococcus faecium J96, a potential probiotic strain, on chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Journal of Food Protection, 63, 1333-1337. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Chiu C.H., Ou J.T. (1996): Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in faeces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and spvC, by an enrichment broth culture-multiplex PCR combination assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34, 2619-2622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Desmidt M., Ducatelle R., Haesebrouck F. (1998): Immunohistochemical observations in caeca of chickens infected with Salmonella enteritidis PT4. Poultry Science, 77, 73-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Gugolek A., Lorek M.O., Rotkiewicz Z., Rotkiewicz T. (2004): Effects of probiotic bacteria on the performance of arctic foxes, pathomorphology and microflora of their alimentary tracts. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 49, 265-271. Go to original source...
  6. Herich R., Levkut M. (2002): Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics and immune system. Veterinární medicína, 47, 169-180. Go to original source...
  7. Holzapfel W.H., Haberer P., Snel J., Schillinger U., Huis Veld J.H.J. (1998): Overview of gut flora and probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41, 85-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hopkins S.A., Niedergang F., Corthesy-Theulaz I.E., Kraehenbuhl J.P. (2000): A recombinant Salmonella typhimurium vaccine strain is taken up and survives within murine. Cellular microbiology, 2, 59-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Jitrapakdee S., Tassanakajon A., Boonsaeng V., Piankijagum S., Panyim S. (1995): A simple, rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella in food by polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 9, 375-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jones B.D., Falkow S. (1996): Salmonellosis: host immune responses and bacterial virulence determinants. Annual Review of Immunology, 14, 533-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kwang J., Littledike E.T., Keen J.E. (1996): Use of the polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella detection. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 22, 46-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. La Ragione R.M., Casula G., Cutting S.M., Woodward M.J. (2001): Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry. Veterinary Microbiology, 79, 133-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lu L., Walker W.A. (2001): Pathologic and physiologic interactions of bacteria with the gastrointestinal epithelium. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73, 1124-1130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Malorny B., Tassios P.T., Radstrom P., Cook N., Wagner M., Hoorfar J. (2003): Standardization of diagnostic PCR for the detection of food borne pathogens. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 83, 39-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Nava G.M., Bielke L.R., Callaway T.R., Castaneda M.P. (2005): Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal infections: the poultry experience. Animal Health Research Reviews, 6, 105-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Palmu L., Camelin I. (1997): The use of competitive exclusion in broilers to reduce the level of Salmonella contamination on the farm and at the processing plant. Poultry Science, 76, 1501-1505. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pascual M., Hugas M., Badiola J.I., Monfort J.M., Garriga M. (1999): Lactobacillus salivarius CT2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 4981-4986. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Popier L.P., Turnbull C.B. (1995): Passage of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella thompson through the chick ileocaecal mucosa. Infect Immunology, 74, 786-792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Poppe C., Demczuk W., Mcfadden K.A., Johnson R.P. (1993): Virulence of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4, 8 and 13 and other Salmonella spp. for day-old chicks hens and mice. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 57, 281-287.
  20. Revolledo R., Ferreira A.J.P., Mead G.C. (2006): Prospects in Salmonella control: Competetive exclusion, probiotics and enhancement of avian intestinal immunity. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 15, 341-351. Go to original source...
  21. Riley M.A., Wertz J.E. (2002): Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. Annual Review of Microbiology, 56, 117-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Stone G.G., Oberst R.D., Hays M.P., Mcvey D.S., Changappa M.M. (1994): Detection of Salmonella in clinical samples using a cultivation-polymerase chain reaction procedure. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 32, 1742-1749. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Mudroňová D. (2003): Effect of Bacteriocin- like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium EF55 on the composition of avian gastrointestinal microflora. Acta Veterinaria, 72, 559-564. Go to original source...
  24. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C. (2004): Lactobacilli and Enterococci - Potential probiotics for dogs. Folia Microbiologica, 49, 203-207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Strompfová V., Lauková A. (2007): In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe, 13, 228-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Vazquez-Torres A., Jones-Carson J., Baumler J., Falkow S., Valdivia R., Brown M.L., Berggren R., Parks W.T., Fang F.C. (1999): Extraintestinal dissemination of Salmonella by CD18- expressing phagocytes. Nature, 401, 804 pp. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.