Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 53(11):466-471 | DOI: 10.17221/341-CJAS

Effects of differences in the initial body weight of groups on laying performance and egg quality parameters of Lohmann laying hens

E. Lacin1, A. Yildiz1, N. Esenbuga2, M. Macit2
1 Department of Animal Husbandry, College of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
2 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of different body weight groups (light (L) = 1 400-1 500; medium (M) = 1 500-1 600 and heavy (H) = 1 600 < g) on performance and egg quality traits of Lohmann hens, 24 weeks of age, in different laying periods. A total of 288 Lohmann White layers were allocated randomly to three groups with respect to live weight, each consisting of 24 replicated cages as subgroups, comprising four hens. The study period lasting for 60 weeks was investigated as four different age periods (first period = 24-40 weeks; second period = 40-54 weeks; third period = 54-68 weeks; fourth period = 68-84 weeks). Differences in the initial live weight at the beginning of experiment among the groups continued to the end of experimental period. Considering the egg production, differences among the groups were not significant (P > 0.05) during the experimental period. Egg weight was determined to be lower in the group with low body weight (64.58 g) than in medium (64.97 g) and heavy hen groups (66.30 g). Differences in feed intake and feed conversion ratio among the groups were found significant, and the mean values were 123.93, 127.48 and 130.67 for feed consumption (g/day); 2.23, 2.28 and 2.27 for feed conversion ratio. Except for the feed conversion ratio, the effect of weight groups by age period interaction on performance parameters was significant (P < 0.01). The effects of body weight on shell strength, shell thickness and yolk index were not significant during the experimental period. However, different body weight groups significantly affected shape index, yolk colour, albumen index and Haugh unit parameters. Shell strength, yolk colour and yolk index values were affected by weight groups by age period interaction. In conclusion, Lohmann White hens in the light group in a uniform flock had higher egg production and lower feed conversion ratio values than those of other weight groups.

Keywords: body weight; laying hen; laying performance; egg quality traits

Published: November 30, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lacin E, Yildiz A, Esenbuga N, Macit M. Effects of differences in the initial body weight of groups on laying performance and egg quality parameters of Lohmann laying hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008;53(11):466-471. doi: 10.17221/341-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Akbas Y., Takma C. (2005): Canonical correlation analysis for studying the relationship between egg production traits and body weight, egg weight and age at sexual maturity in layers. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50, 163-168. Go to original source...
  2. Altan O., Oguz I., Akbas Y. (1998): Effects of selection for high body weight and age of hen on egg characteristics in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 22, 467-474.
  3. Anonymous (2003): Report on Pullet Rearing Period 35th North Carolina Layer Performance And Management Test. 35, 2 pp.
  4. AOAC (1990): Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA.
  5. Ayorinde K.L., Toye A.A., Aruleba O.A. (1988): Association between body weight and two feeding regimes during the growing phase on growth performance and early lay characteristics of pullets. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production, 22, 101-107. Go to original source...
  6. Cerolini S., Mariani P., Cavalchini L.G., Filoni P. (1994): Effects of body-weight and feed restriction on the productive efficiency of laying hens. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 58, 30-33. Go to original source...
  7. Du Plessis P.H.C., Erasmus J. (1972): The relationship between egg production egg weight and body weight in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal, 28, 301-310. Go to original source...
  8. Festing M.F., Nordskog A.W. (1967): Response to selection for body weight and egg weight in chickens. Genetics, 55, 219-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Harms R.H., Russell G.B. (1996): Ability of commercial laying hens producing different egg outputs to meet their methionine and energy requirements when fed the same diets. Poultry Science, 75, 519-521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Harms R.H., Costa P.T., Miles R.D. (1982): Daily feed intake and performance of laying hens grouped according to their body weight. Poultry Science, 1021-1024. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Harms R.H., Olivero V., Russell G.B. (2000): A comparison of performance and energy intake of commercial layers based on body weight or egg weight. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 9, 179-184. Go to original source...
  12. Kirikci K., Cetin O., Gunlu A., Garip M. (2004): Effect of hen weight on egg production and some egg quality characteristics in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). AsianAustralasian Journal of Animal Science, 17, 684-687. Go to original source...
  13. Leeson S., Summers J.D. (1987): Effect of immature body weight on laying performance. Poultry Science, 66, 1924-1928. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Leeson S., Caston L., Summers J.D. (1997): Layer performance of four strains of leghorn pullets subjected to various rearing programs. Poultry Science, 76, 1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Marks H.L. (1979): Changes in unselected traits accompanying long-term selection for four-week body weight in Japanese Quail. Poultry Science, 58, 269-274. Go to original source...
  16. Oke U.K., Herbert U., Nwachukwu E.N. (2004): Association between body weight and some egg production traits in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata Palas). Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16, 1-10.
  17. Robinson D., Sheridan A.K. (1982): Effects of restricted feeding in growing and laying period on the performance of White Leghorn by Australorp cross-bred and White Leghorn strain cross chickens. British Poultry Science, 23, 199-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Sorensen P., Ambrosen T., Petersen A. (1980): Scandinavian selection and crossbreeding experiment with laying hens. IV. Results from the Danish part of the experiment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 30, 288-308. Go to original source...
  19. Summers J.D., Leeson S. (1983): Factors influencing egg size. Poultry Science, 62, 1155-1159. Go to original source...
  20. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences (1996): SPSS for Windows release 10.01. SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA.
  21. Yannakopoulos A.L., Tserveni-Gousi A.S. (1986): Quality characteristics of quail eggs. British Poultry Science, 27, 171-176. Go to original source...
  22. Yoruk M.A., Gul M., Hayirli A., Macit M. (2004): The effects of supplementation of humate and probiotic on egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens. Poultry Science, 83, 84-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.