Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2007, 52(8):236-248 | DOI: 10.17221/2281-CJAS

Stochastic simulation of the influence of insemination on the estimation of breeding value and its reliability

Z. Veselá1, J. Přibyl1, L. Vostrý1, L. Štolc2
1 Institute of Animal Science, Praha-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
2 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague-Suchdol, Czech Republic

Insemination is used less commonly in the population of beef cattle than in dairy cattle. As a consequence, herds are genetically isolated and their comparison is difficult. The objective of the paper was to evaluate the impact of the use of reference sires in insemination on the estimation of breeding value and its reliability by means of stochastic simulation based on a single addition of calves to the basic set. Simulation was divided into three variants according to the connectedness calves through sires (variant 1 - unrelated calves, variant 2 calves related between HYS but unrelated within HYS, variant 3 - calves related within and between HYS). The degree of connectedness was determined by computation of genetic drift variance (GDV). The average value of GDV in the basic set was 0.71. In our study the highest values of GDV were reached in simulated variant 3, in which the relationship increased not only between HYS but also within HYS. The lowest values of GDV were in variant 2, when the relationship increased only between HYS (simulated calves after reference sires did not have any half-sibs in HYS). The single use of reference sires in one generation to make herds connected slightly increased the average coefficient of reliability from 0.121 to 0.145 (by 2.4%) in the whole set. But this increase from 0.24 to 0.33 (by 8.9%) was observed only in animals that were directly connected through reference sires. The increase in reliability was mainly due to an increase in the number of contemporaries. A decrease in the effective number of sires' offspring was an indirect consequence of the increase in the connectedness of the set and higher use of reference sires in insemination. This is the reason why the increase in the connectedness of the set influenced the reliability of breeding value of the whole set less than we would expect. The use of reference sires influenced the fluctuation of breeding values. The use of a higher number of reference sires in insemination with only one offspring in each of the connected herds appeared as the most suitable approach from the aspect of the connectedness of the set and reliability of breeding value estimation. A marked influence of herd connectedness on the estimation of breeding value and its reliability, and on the result of breeding, is to be expected after reference sires have been used in several successive generations.

Keywords: beef cattle; breeding value; connectedness; reference sires; reliability; stochastic simulation

Published: August 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Veselá Z, Přibyl J, Vostrý L, Štolc L. Stochastic simulation of the influence of insemination on the estimation of breeding value and its reliability. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2007;52(8):236-248. doi: 10.17221/2281-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Brascamp E.W. (1978): Methods of economic optimization of animal breeding plans. Research Institute for Animal Husbandry Schoonoord. Zeist, Raport B-134, 117 pp.
  2. Clement V., Bibe B., Verrier E., Elsen J.M., Manfredi E., Bouix J., Hanocq E. (2001): Simulation of model adequacy and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters for traits with direct and maternal effect. Genet. Sel. Evol., 33, 369-395. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Gibson J.P. (1995): An introduction to the design and economics of animal breeding strategies. University of Guelph, Canada, 224 pp.
  4. Hanocq E., Boichard D., Foulley J.L. (1996): A simulation study of the effect of connectedness on genetic trend. Genet. Sel. Evol., 28, 67-82. Go to original source...
  5. Henderson C.R. (1984): Application of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Press, 462 pp.
  6. Johnson P.L., Sherlock R.G., Lopez-Villalobos N., Garrick D.J., Blair H.T. (2002): Optimisation of breeding scheme design for the New Zealand texel sire referencing scheme. 7th WCGALP Montpellier, Communication, 02-08.
  7. Kennedy B.W., Trus D. (1993): Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under animal model. J. Anim. Sci., 71, 2341-2352. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Lewis R.M., Simm G. (2000): Selection in sire referencing scheme in sheep. Livest. Prod. Sci., 67, 129-141. Go to original source...
  9. Lewis R.M., Crump R.E., Simm G., Thomson R. (1999): Assessing connectedness in across-flock genetic evaluation. In: Proc. Brit. Society of Animal Science, 121 pp. Go to original source...
  10. Meyer K. (1992): Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci., 31, 179-204. Go to original source...
  11. Meyer K. (2001): Estimates of direct and maternal covariance functions for growth of Australian beef calves from birth to weaning, Genet. Sel. Evol., 33, 487-514. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Miglior F., Van Doormaal B.J. (2000): Impact of Second Country Proofs on Genetic Evaluations. Interbull Bulletin, 25, 57-59.
  13. Mrode R.A. (1996): Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding value. CAB International, Wallingford, 187 pp.
  14. Přibyl J., Přibylová J. (2001): Expected reliability of cow's breeding value for average life-time milk production. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 46, 523-532.
  15. Přibyl J., Misztal I., Přibylová J., Šeba K. (2003): Multiplebreed, multiple-traits evaluation of beef cattle in the Czech Republic. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 48, 519-532.
  16. Přibylová J., Vostrý L., Veselá Z., Přibyl J., Bohmanová J. (2004): Breeding value for own growth of beef bulls in performance-test station. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep., 22, 97-103.
  17. Robinson O.W. (1981): The influence of maternal effects on the efficiency of selection: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 8, 212-137. Go to original source...
  18. Searle S.R. (1987): Linear model for unbalanced data. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 560 pp.
  19. Simm G., Lewis R.M., Collins J.E., Nieuwhof G.J. (2001): Use of sire referencing scheme to select for improved carcass composition in sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 255-259. Go to original source...
  20. Sorensen D.A., Kennedy B.W. (1983): The use of the relationship matrix to account for genetic drift variance in the analysis of genetic experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet., 66, 217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Šafus P., Přibyl J., Veselá Z., Vostrý L., Štípková M., Stádník L. (2006): Selection indexes for bulls of beef cattle. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51, 285-298. Go to original source...
  22. Tosh J.J., Wilton J.W. (1994): Effect of data structure on variance of prediction error and accuracy of genetic evaluation. J. Anim. Sci., 72, 2568-2577. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Van Vleck L.D. (1987): Contemporary groups for genetic evaluations. J. Dairy Sci., 70, 2456-2464. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Veselá Z., Přibyl J., Vostrý L., Štolc L. (2004): Effect of sire referencing scheme on reliability of the breeding value estimation in beef cattle. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep., 22, 151-157.
  25. Veselá Z., Přibyl J., Šafus P., Vostrý L., Šeba K., Štolc L. (2005): Breeding value for type traits in beef cattle in the Czech Republic. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, 385-393. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.