Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2006, 51(2):47-53 | DOI: 10.17221/3908-CJAS

Effect of breed on growth performance and carcass composition of Aberdeen Angus, Charolais,Herefordand Simmental bulls

L. Bartoň, D. Řehák, V. Teslík, D. Bureš, R. Zahrádková
Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic

Breed effects on live weight gain, slaughter characteristics and carcass composition were compared in Aberdeen Angus, Charolais, Hereford and Simmental bulls. The experiment extended over 2 years and involved totally 96 animals. The target slaughter live weights were determined 550 kg for earlier maturing breeds Aberdeen Angus and Hereford and 630 kg for later maturing breeds Charolais and Simmental. Charolais and Simmental gained more rapidly (P < 0.05) than Aberdeen Angus while Hereford were intermediate. Hereford had lower (P < 0.05) dressing percentage than the other breeds. Percentages of grade I meat were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in Charolais and Simmental. The highest percentage of separable fat was recorded in Hereford (P < 0.05). Charolais and Simmental had lower (P < 0.05) thickness of subcutaneous fat over MLLT than Aberdeen Angus andHereford. The later maturing bulls generally tended to achieve higher live weight gains during the experiment, produced less fat and had higher percentage of meat from high priced joints in comparison with earlier maturing animals.

Keywords: beef cattle; bulls; breeds; growth; carcass composition

Published: February 28, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bartoň L, Řehák D, Teslík V, Bureš D, Zahrádková R. Effect of breed on growth performance and carcass composition of Aberdeen Angus, Charolais,Herefordand Simmental bulls. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2006;51(2):47-53. doi: 10.17221/3908-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Anonymous (1991): Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1026/91 of 22 April 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1208/81 determining the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. Community legislation in force, Document 391R1026, 1-2.
  2. Chambaz A., Morel I., Scheeder M.R.L., Kreuzer M., Dufey P.A. (2001): Characteristic of steers of six beef breeds fattened from eight months of age and slaughtered at a target level of intramuscular fat I. Growth performance and carcass quality. Arch. Tierzucht., 44, 395-411. Go to original source...
  3. Cross H.R., Crouse J.D., MacNeil M.D. (1984): Influence of breed, sex, age nad electrical stimulation on carcass and palatability traits of three bovine muscles. J. Anim. Sci., 58, 1358-1365. Go to original source...
  4. Everitt G.C., Jury K.E., Dalton D.C., Langridge M. (1980): Beef production from the dairy herd. New Zeal. J. Agric. Res., 23, 11-20. Go to original source...
  5. Gregory K.E., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M. (1991): Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for growth traits in both sexes of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 69, 3202-3212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gregory K.E., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M. (1994a): Breed effects, dietary energy density effects, and retained heterosis on different measures of gain efficiency in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 72, 1138-1154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Gregory K.E., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M., Dikeman M.E., Koohmaraie M. (1994b): Breed effects and retained heterosis for growth, carcass, and meat traits in advanced generations of composite populations of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 72, 833-850. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Keane M.G., More O'Ferrall G.J., Connoly J., Allen P. (1990): Carcass composition of serially slaughtered Friesian, Hereford × Friesian and Charolais × Friesian steers finished on two dietary energy levels. Anim. Prod., 50, 231-243. Go to original source...
  9. Kempster A.J., Cook G.L., Southgate J.R. (1982): A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristics, and rate and efficiency of meat gain. Anim. Prod., 34, 167-178. Go to original source...
  10. Kempster A.J., Cook G.L., Southgate J.R. (1988): Evaluation of British Friesian, Canadian Holstein and beef breed × British Friesian steers slaughtered over a commercial range of fattness from 16-month and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristic, and rate and efficiency of lean gain. Anim. Prod., 46, 365-378. Go to original source...
  11. Koch R.M., Dikeman M.E., Crouse J.D. (1982): Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle III). III. Carcass composition, quality and palatability. J. Anim. Sci., 54, 35-45. Go to original source...
  12. Laborde F.L., Mandell I.B., Tosh J.J., Wilton J.W., Buchanan-Smith J.G. (2001): Breed effects on growth performance, carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and palatability attributes in finishing steers. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 355-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Littel R.C., Stroup W., Freund R. (2002): SAS System for linear models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  14. Mandell I.B., Gullett E.A., Wilton J.W., Kemp R.A., Allen O.B. (1997): Effects of gender and breed on carcass traits, chemical composition, and palatability attributes in Hereford and Simmental bulls and steers. Livest. Prod. Sci., 49, 235-248. Go to original source...
  15. Mandell I.B., Gullett E.A., Wilton J.W., Allen O.B., Kemp R.A. (1998): Effects of breed and dietary energy content within breed on growth performance, carcass and chemical composition and beef quality in Hereford and Simmental steers. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 78, 533-541. Go to original source...
  16. More O'Ferrall G.J., Keane M.G. (1990): A comparison for live weight and carcass production of Charolais, Hereford a Friesian steer progeny from Friesians cows finished on two energy levels and serially slaughtered. Anim. Prod., 50, 19-28. Go to original source...
  17. Morris C.A., Baker R.L., Carter A.H., Hickey S.M. (1990): Evaluation of eleven cattle breeds for crossbred beef production: carcass data from males slaughtered at two stages. Anim. Prod., 50, 79-92. Go to original source...
  18. Polách P., Šubrt J., Bjelka M., Uttendorfský K., Filipčík R. (2004): Carcass value of the progeny of tested beef bulls. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49, 315-322. Go to original source...
  19. SAS (2001): Release 8.2 (TS2MO) of the SAS ® System for Microsoft® Windows®. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  20. Šeba K. (2004): Současný stav ve šlechtění a masné produkci masného skotu. In: Aktuální otázky produkce jatečných zvířat. Brno. 37-45.
  21. Scheffe H. (1953): A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40, 87-104. Go to original source...
  22. Šubrt J., Frelich J., Polach P., Voříšková J. (1999): Analysis of carcass quality in sons of breeding bulls of meat breeds. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 44, 39-48.
  23. Urick J.J., MacNeil M.D., Reynolds W.L. (1991): Biological type effects on postweaning growth, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of steers. J. Anim. Sci., 69, 490-497. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Voříšková J., Frelich J., Přibyl J. (1998): Carcass value of bulls-crosses of Czech Pied and Black Pied cattle with beef bovine breeds. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 43, 77-86.
  25. Wheeler T.L., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M., Crouse J.D. (1996): Characterization of biological types of cattle (cycle IV.): Carcass traits and longissimus palatability. J. Anim. Sci., 74, 1023-1035. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wheeler T.L., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M., Dikeman M.E., Crouse J.D. (1997): Characterization of different biological types of steers (cycle IV.): Wholesale, subprimal, and retail product yields. J. Anim. Sci., 75, 2389-2403. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Wheeler T.L., Cundiff L.V., Shackelford S.D., Koohmaraie M. (2005): Characterization of biological types of cattle (cycle VII): Carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits. J. Anim. Sci., 83, 196-207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.