Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2005, 50(2):81-88 | DOI: 10.17221/3999-CJAS

Effect of selected fattening performance and carcass value traits on textural properties of beef

J. Sochor1, J. Simeonovová2, J. Šubrt2, J. Buchar2
1 Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

Fifty-one crossbreed young bulls, progenies of Charolais (CH), Czech Pied (CP), Simmental (SI) and Blonde d'Aquitaine (BA) beef cattle bred at the paternal position crossed by Czech Pied at the maternal position, were reared in a typical production system and slaughtered at an average age of 578 days and live weight of 656 kg. The animals were evaluated for fattening performance and carcass quality traits (live weight at slaughter, age at slaughter, total weight gain, carcass weight, dressing percentage, net daily gain) and meat quality characteristics (dry matter, proteins, fat, ash, pH48, water holding capacity, remission, collagen, area of M. longissimus dorsi and cooking loss). Correlation coefficients were determined in order to discover which of the above-mentioned characteristics influenced textural properties measured by Warner-Bratzler (WB) shear device and compression test (TPA). It can be concluded from the overall assessment of the correlation coefficients that slaughter age (r = 0.68, P < 0.001), net daily gain (r = -0.54, P < 0.001), average lifetime daily gain (r = -0.50, P < 0.001) and pH48 (r = -0.51, P < 0.001) had the major influence on the textural properties measured by WB shears. Meat texture expressed by TPA was mainly influenced by live weight at slaughter (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), carcass weight (r = 0.50, P < 0.001) and pH48 (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found out for the age at slaughter (CH × BA) and (CP × BA), slaughter weight (CP × SI) and (CP × BA) and carcass weight (CP × BA). At the same level of significance further differences were found out for pH48 and water holding capacity (CP × SI), (CP × BA) and cooking loss (CH × CP). Highly significant differences (P < 0.01) in the textural properties (measured by WB shears) were determined between the following breeds: (CH × BA) and (CP × BA). At the level of significance P < 0.05, the highest differences were identified between (CH × SI) and (CP × SI). TPA test showed statistically significant differences between (CH × CP), (CP × SI) breeds at the level P < 0.05.

Keywords: bulls; fattening performance traits; meat quality; textural properties; Warner-Bratzler shears; compression test

Published: February 28, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sochor J, Simeonovová J, Šubrt J, Buchar J. Effect of selected fattening performance and carcass value traits on textural properties of beef. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2005;50(2):81-88. doi: 10.17221/3999-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bailey A.J., Light N.D. (1989): Connective Tissue in Meat and Meat Products. Elsev. Appl. Sci., London, 195-224.
  2. Christensen M., Purslow P.P., Larsen L.M. (2000): The effect of cooking temperature on mechanical properties of whole meat, single muscle fibres and perimysial connective tissue. Meat Sci., 55, 301-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cross H.R., Carpenter Z.L., Smith G.C. (1973): Effects of intramuscular collagen and elastin on bovine muscle tenderness. J. Food Sci., 38, 998-1003. Go to original source...
  4. Cross H.R., Schanbacher B.D., Crouse J.D. (1984): Sex, age and breed related changes in bovine testosterone and intramuscular collagen. Meat Sci., 10, 187-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Dransfield E. (1977): Intramuscular composition and texture of beef muscles. J. Sci. Food Agric., 28, 833- 842. Go to original source...
  6. Gil M., Serra X., Gispert M., Oliver M.A., Sañudo C., Panea B., Olleta J.L., Campo M.M., Oliván M., Osoro K., García-Cachán M.D., Cruz-Sagredo R., Izquierdo M., Espejo M., Martín M., Piedrfita J. (2001): The effect of beef-production systems on the myosin heavy chain 1, the biochemical characteristics and the colour variables of Longissimus thoracis from seven Spanish beef cattle breeds. Meat Sci., 58, 181-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Gullet E.A., Buttenham S., Hore T. (1996): Effect of age and cut on consistency of tenderness and leanness of beef. Food Qual. Pref., 7, 37-45. Go to original source...
  8. Houška M., Pavlíčková I., Pokorný J. (1994): Correlations of evaluation of sensory and instrumental hardness. Potrav. Vědy, 12, 475-488.
  9. Huff E.J., Parris F.C. (1993): Bovine longissimus muscle tenderness as affected by post-mortem aging time, animal age and sex. J. Food Sci., 58, 713-716. Go to original source...
  10. Jeremiah L.E. (1982): A review of factors influencing consumption, selection, and acceptability of meat purchases. J. Cons. Stud. Home Econ., 6, 137-154. Go to original source...
  11. Jeremiah L.E., Aalhus J.L., Robertson W.M., Gibson L.L., (1997): The effect of grade, gender and post-mortem treatments on beef. II. Cooking properties and palatability attributes. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 77, 41-54. Go to original source...
  12. Kamdem A.T.K., Hardy J. (1994): Grinding as a method of meat texture evaluation. Meat Sci., 39, 225-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Koch R., Dikeman M.E., Crouse J.D. (1982): Characterisation of biological types of cattle (Cycle III) III. Carcass composition, quality and palatability. J. Anim. Sci., 54, 35-45. Go to original source...
  14. Mandell I.B., Gullett E.A., Wilton J.W., Kemp R.A., Allen O.B. (1997): Effects of gender and breed on carcass traits, chemical composition, and palatability attributes in Hereford and Simmental bulls and steers. Livest. Prod. Sci., 49, 235-248. Go to original source...
  15. Özlütürk A., Tüzemen N., Yanar M., Esenbuga N., Dursun E. (2004): Fattening performance, carcass traits and meat quality characteristics of calves sired by Charolais, Simmental and Eastern Anatolian Red sires mated to Eastern Anatolian Red dams. Meat Sci., 67, 463-470. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sami A.S., Augustini C., Schwarz F.J. (2004): Effects of feeding intensity and time on feed on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Simmental bulls. Meat Sci., 67, 195-201. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Sañudo C., Macie E.S., Olleta J.L., Villarroel M., Panea B., Albertí P. (2004): The effects of slaughter weight, breed type and ageing time on beef meat quality using two different texture devices. Meat Sci., 66, 925-932. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Scheeder M. R. L., Casutt M. M., Roulin M., Escher F., Dufey P. A., Kreuzer M., (2001): Fatty acid composition, cooking loss and texture of beef patties from meat of bulls fed different fats. Meat Sci., 58, 321-328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Shorthose W.R., Harris P.V. (1990): Effect of animal age on the tenderness of selected beef muscles. J. Food Sci., 55, 1-8. Go to original source...
  20. Sochor J., Simeonovová J., Jarošová A. (2005): The differences of tenderness between beef, pork and turkey meat. Acta Aliment. Hung., 34, in print.
  21. Szczesniak A.S. (2002): Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Pref., 13, 215-225. Go to original source...
  22. Thompson J. (2002): Managing meat tenderness. Meat Sci., 62: 295-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Tornberg E., (1996): Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness. Meat Sci., 43, 175-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Torrescano G., Sanchez-Escalante A., Gimenez Roncales P., Beltrán J.A. (2003): Shear values of raw samples of fourteen bovine muscles and their relation to muscle collagen characteristics. Meat Sci., 64, 85-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Yu L.P., Lee B.Y. (1986): Effects of postmortem pH and temperature on bovine muscle structure and meat tenderness. J. Food Sci., 51, 774-780. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.