Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2026, 71(9):406-416 | DOI: 10.17221/48/2026-CJAS

Effects of fresh olive cake inclusion in ensiledtotal mixed rations on in vitro rumen fermentation kinetics and methane productionOriginal Paper

Murat Er ORCID...1, Kanber Kara ORCID...2, Eren Kuter ORCID...3, Hulusi Akçay ORCID...4, Sena Yılmaz Öztaş ORCID...2
1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Karşıyaka Vocational School, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Türkiye
2 Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
3 Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye
4 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Türkiye

This study evaluated the effects of replacing maize silage with increasing levels of olive cake (OC) in ensiled total mixed rations (ETMR) on microbial quality, in vitro rumen fermentation kinetics, methane production, and estimated energy parameters. Three experimental diets were formulated to contain 0% (Control), 10% (OC10), and 20% (OC20) olive cake on a dry matter basis and were ensiled for 60 days. On day 60, ETMRs were opened, microbial composition was assessed, and in vitro ruminal fermentation was conducted for 24 h using the gas production technique. No significant differences were observed among treatments in bacterial counts (P > 0.05), and coliforms and enterobacteria were below detectable limits in all groups. Increasing OC inclusion showed a trend toward reducing butyric acid concentration (P = 0.055) and significantly reduced propionic acid concentration (P < 0.05), whereas acetic acid concentration remained unaffected. Total short-chain fatty acids (TSCFA, mmol/l) concentration tended to decrease with increasing OC inclusion (P = 0.060). Furthermore, OC inclusion significantly reduced total gas production, metabolisable energy (ME), organic matter digestibility (OMD), and net energy for lactation (NEL) (P < 0.001). Methane production (ml/0.2 g DM) decreased numerically by approximately 14%, although this reduction was not statistically significant. Methane as a proportion of total gas was also unaffected. Ammonia-N concentrations did not differ among treatments. The reduction in methane output appeared to be associated with a general suppression of fermentative activity rather than a shift toward propionate-driven hydrogen utilisation. The lipid-rich and phenolic composition of OC may have contributed to reduced microbial fermentation intensity and hydrogen availability. Although higher inclusion levels negatively affected digestibility and energy values, moderate inclusion may offer a balance between environmental benefits and nutritional efficiency.

Keywords: agro-industrial by-products; enteric methane mitigation; gas production technique; silage microbiology; ruminal fermentation profile

Received: April 1, 2026; Accepted: August 10, 2026; Published: September 29, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Er M, Kara K, Kuter E, Akçay H, Yılmaz Öztaş S. Effects of fresh olive cake inclusion in ensiledtotal mixed rations on in vitro rumen fermentation kinetics and methane production. Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2026;71(9):406-416. doi: 10.17221/48/2026-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Afonso RB, Adivi LN, Linehan K, O'Donovan M, Hill C, Ross RP, Stanton C. Potential of silage inoculants to mitigate methane production from the rumen: A systematic review. J Dairy Sci. 2026 Feb;109(2):2053-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Aschenbach JR, Penner GB, Stumpff F, Gabel G. Ruminant nutrition symposium: Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1092-107. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Baceninaite D, Dzermeikaite K, Antanaitis R. Global warming and dairy cattle: How to control and reduce methane emission. Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 6;12(19):2687. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Masse D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review. Can J Anim Sci. 2004 Apr;84(3):319-35. Go to original source...
  5. Bueno AVI, Lazzari G, Jobim CC, Daniel JLP. Ensiling total mixed ration for ruminants: A review. Agronomy. 2020 Jun;10(6):879. Go to original source...
  6. Dhanasekaran DK, Dias-Silva TP, Filho ALA, Sakita GZ, Abdalla AL, Louvandini H, Elghandour MM. Plants extract and bioactive compounds on rumen methanogenesis. Agrofor Syst. 2020 Aug;94(4):1541-53. Go to original source...
  7. Dijkstra J, van Gastelen S, Dieho K, Nichols K, Bannink A. Review: Rumen sensors: Data and interpretation for key rumen metabolic processes. Animal. 2020 Mar;14(S1):s176-86. Go to original source...
  8. Driehuis F, Wilkinson JM, Jiang Y, Ogunade I, Adesogan AT. Silage review: Animal and human health risks from silage. J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4093-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Driehuis F. Silage and the safety and quality of dairy foods: A review. Agric Food Sci. 2013;22(1):16-34. Go to original source...
  10. Ellis JL, Hindrichsen IK, Klop G, Kinley RD, Milora N, Bannink A, Dijkstra J. Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2016 Sep;99(9):7159-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Er M, Ahsan U, Kuter E, Ramay HAMS, Karagoz DM, Takka MO. Fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of total mixed ration ensiled with fresh olive cake. J Anim Plant Sci. 2025 Sep;35(5):1335-44. Go to original source...
  12. Ersahince AC, Kara K. Nutrient composition and in vitro digestion parameters of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) herbage at different maturity stages in horse and ruminant. J Anim Feed Sci. 2017 Sep;26(3):213-25. Go to original source...
  13. Firkins JL, Yu Z, Morrison M. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: Perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jun;90(Suppl_1):E1-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Foti P, Pino A, Romeo FV, Vaccalluzzo A, Caggia C, Randazzo CL. Olive pomace and pate olive cake as suitable ingredients for food and feed. Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 21;10(2):237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hadhoud FI, Shaaban MM, Abd El Tawab AM, Khattab MSA, Ebeid HM, Gouda GA, Abdo MM. Olive cake silage as alternative roughage for ruminant: Effect on rumen degradability and in vitro gas production. Egypt J Nutr Feeds. 2020 Jun;23(2):265-72. Go to original source...
  16. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci. 1995 Aug;73(8):2483-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kara K, Guclu BK, Baytok E. Comparison of nutrient composition and antimethanogenic properties of different Rosaceae species. J Anim Feed Sci. 2015 Nov;24(4):308-14. Go to original source...
  18. Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):4020-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. McAllister TA, Newbold CJ. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008;48(2):7-13. Go to original source...
  20. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when incubated with rumen liquor. J Agric Sci. 1979 Aug;93(1):217-22. Go to original source...
  21. Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 1988;28:7-55.
  22. Muck RE. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev Bras Zootec. 2010 Jul;39:183-91. Go to original source...
  23. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001. 408 p.
  24. Pallara G, Buccioni A, Pastorelli R, Minieri S, Mele M, Rapaccini S, Messini A, Pauselli M, Servili M, Giovannetti L, Viti C. Effect of stoned olive pomace on rumen microbial communities and polyunsaturated fatty acid biohydrogenation: An in vitro study. BMC Vet Res. 2014 Nov 26;10:271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J Sci Food Agric. 2011 Jan 15;91(1):24-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Ungerfeld EM. Inhibition of rumen methanogenesis and ruminant productivity: A meta-analysis. Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 19;5:113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. van Zijderveld SM, Gerrits WJ, Apajalahti JA, Newbold JR, Dijkstra J, Leng RA, Perdok HB. Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Dec;93(12):5856-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Vastolo A, Mora B, Kiatti DD, Nocerino M, HaroutounianS, Baka RD, Ligda P, Cutrignelli MI, Niderkorn V, Calabro S. Assessment of the effect of agro-industrial by-products rich in polyphenols on in vitro fermentation and methane reduction in sheep. Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 30;12:1530419. Go to original source...
  29. Xie X, Cao Y, Li Q, Li Q, Yang X, Wang R, Zhang X, Tan Z, Lin B, Wang M. Mitigating enteric methane emissions: An overview of methanogenesis, inhibitors and future prospects. Anim Nutr. 2025 Feb 8;21:84-96. Go to original source...
  30. Yanez Ruiz DR, Bannink A, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Morgavi DP, O'Kiely P, Hristov AN. Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants - A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016 Jun;216:1-18. Go to original source...
  31. Yanez Ruiz DR, Moumen A, Martin Garcia AI, Molina Alcaide E. Ruminal fermentation and degradation patterns, protozoa population, and urinary purine derivatives excretion in goats and wethers fed diets based on two-stage olive cake: Effect of PEG supply. J Anim Sci. 2004 Jul;82(7):2023-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Yang Z, Liu S, Xie T, Wang Q, Wang Z, Yang H, Li S, Wang W. Effect of unsaturated fatty acid ratio in vitro on rumen fermentation, methane concentration, and microbial profile. Fermentation. 2022 Oct;8(10):540. Go to original source...
  33. Yilmaz K, Kara K, Oztas SY, Pirci G, Aslan O, Soylu Y. Effect of polyol supplementation in forage-based total mixed rations on in vitro rumen gas production and fermentation in beef cattle. J Anim Feed Sci. 2025 Apr;34(4):644-50. Go to original source...
  34. Zhang G, Li J, Liu S, Hou P, Tao X, Gao W, Sun L, Lv L, Liang J. Recent advances in bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass for volatile fatty acid production with rumen microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv. 2025 Oct;83:108654. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.