Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2019, 64(10):431-438 | DOI: 10.17221/145/2019-CJAS

Differences between Jersey and Holstein cows in milking-induced teat prolongation during lactationOriginal Paper

Matúš Gašparík*,1, Luděk Stádník1, Jaromír Ducháček1, Vladimír Tančin2,3
1 Department of Animal Science; Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
3 Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Factors consequential to milking-induced teat prolongation (MITP) were identified. Effects of breed, teat position, lactation number, lactation stage and their interactions were evaluated. The length of each teat before and after milking was measured seven times during lactation in 59 Holstein cows and 45 Jersey cows. Rear teats seemed to prolong more with the exception of rear left teats of Holstein cows. MITP of Holsteins was more balanced among quarters compared to Jerseys, where we observed significantly higher MITP of their rear teats. The pairs mostly had similar reactions even for different teat lengths, therefore for future studies evaluating one of each pair should be sufficient and more effective. Development of MITP during lactation showed more variability at the onset of lactation, followed by more uniform response at later stages. Lower MITP for higher parity cows was observed only in Holsteins. Overall, Jerseys achieved a significantly higher level of MITP, which suggests breed differences in reaction to milking. Effects identified in this study should be taken into consideration while designing future experiments in this area. In addition, our results suggest the future necessity to improve milking technology to allow group or even individual settings optimization based on breed, lactation stage, lactation number, and teat position.

Keywords: dairy cow; milking; teat length; teat position

Published: October 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gašparík M, Stádník L, Ducháček J, Tančin V. Differences between Jersey and Holstein cows in milking-induced teat prolongation during lactation. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2019;64(10):431-438. doi: 10.17221/145/2019-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Divers T.J., Peek S.F. (2007): Rebhun's Diseases of Dairy Cattle. Sounders, Elsevier, St. Louis, USA. dos Santos S.K., Oliveira M.G., Noriler E.P., Vrisman D.P., Borges L.P.B., Santos V.J.C., Coutinho L.N., Teixeira P.P.M. (2016): Mammary gland ultrasound evaluation of Jersey cattle breed. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 44, 1-5. Go to original source...
  2. Gasparik M., Duchacek J., Stadnik L., Novakova V. (2018): Impact of milking settings optimization on milk quality, milking time and milk yield in Holstein cows. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 420, 012073. Go to original source...
  3. Geishauser T., Querengasser K. (2000): Investigations on teat canal length in teats with milk flow disturbances. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 1976-1980. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Genc M., Coban O., Ozenturk U., Eltas O. (2018): Influence of breed and parity on teat and milking characteristics in dairy cattle. Macedonian Veterinary Review, 41, 169-176. Go to original source...
  5. Gleeson D.E., O'Callaghan E.J., Rath M.V. (2004): Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal, 57, 289-296. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Guarin J.F., Ruegg P.L. (2016): Pre- and postmilking anatomical characteristics of teats and their associations with risk of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 99, 8323-8329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Guarin J.F., Paixao M.G., Ruegg P.L. (2017): Association of anatomical characteristics of teats with quarter-level somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 643-652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hamann J., Mein G.A., Wetzel S. (1993): Teat tissue reactions to milking: Effects of vacuum level. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 1040-1046. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Ipema A.H., Tancin V., Hogewerf P.H. (2005): Responses of milk removal characteristics of single quarters on different vacuum levels. ICAR Technical Series, 10, 49-55.
  10. Isaksson A., Lind O. (1992): Teat reactions in cows associated with machine milking. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 39, 282-288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lacy-Hulbert S.J., Hillerton J.E. (1995): Physical characteristics of the bovine teat canal and their influence on susceptibility to streptococcal infection. Journal of Dairy Research, 62, 395-404. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lees C., Vincent J.F., Hillerton J.E. (1991): Poisson's ratio in skin. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, 1, 19-23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Neijenhuis F., Barkema H.W., Hogeveen H., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M. (2001): Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 2664-2672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. O'Callaghan E.J. (2001): Influence of liner design on interactions of the teat and liner. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 40, 169-176.
  15. Parilova M., Stadnik L., Jezkova A., Stolc L. (2011): Effect of milking vacuum level and overmilking on cow's teat characteristics. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59, 193-202. Go to original source...
  16. Stadnik L., Louda F., Bezdicek J., Jezkova A., Rakos M. (2010): Changes in teat parameters caused by milking and their recovery to their initial size. Archiv Tierzucht, 53, 650-662. Go to original source...
  17. Strapak P., Szencziova I., Stadnik L. (2015): Use of ultrasonography for evaluation of internal structures of udder and teats in dairy cows. Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovakia. (in Slovak)
  18. Strapak P., Strapakova E., Rusinova M., Szencziova I. (2017): The influence of milking on the teat canal of dairy cows determined by ultrasonographic measurements. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 62, 75-81. Go to original source...
  19. Tancin V., Ipema B., Hogewerf P., Macuhova J. (2006): Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 978-988. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Weiss D., Weinfurtner M., Bruckmaier R.M. (2004): Teat anatomy and its relationship with quarter and udder milk flow characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 3280-3289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Zwertvaegher I., Baert J., Vangeyte J., Genbrugge A., Van Weyenberg S. (2011): Objective measuring technique for teat dimensions of dairy cows. Biosystems Engineering, 110, 206-212. Go to original source...
  22. Zwertvaegher I., Van Weyenberg S., Piepers S., Baert J., De Vliegher S. (2012): Variance components of teat dimensions in dairy cows and associated factors. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 4978-4988. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Zwertvaegher I., De Vliegher S., Verbist B., Van Nuffel A., Baert J., Van Weyenberg S. (2013): Short communication: Associations between teat dimensions and milkinginduced changes in teat dimensions and quarter milk somatic cell counts in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 1075-1080. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.