Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2019, 64(10):411-419 | DOI: 10.17221/62/2019-CJAS
Genetic diversity and population structure of four cattle breeds raised in Turkey using microsatellite markersOriginal Paper
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
In the present study, genetic diversity and population structure of Holstein Friesian and three native cattle breeds of Turkey including Turkish Grey Steppe, Eastern Anatolian Red and Anatolian Black were assessed. Totally 120 individuals of 4 breeds were genotyped using 20 microsatellite markers and 204 different alleles, of which 31 were private alleles, were detected. The average observed and expected heterozygosity values were 0.63 and 0.74, respectively. Observed heterozygosity at the marker level ranged from 0.30 (DRBP1) to 0.88 (ILSTS011), while expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.51 (INRABERN172) to 0.88 (SPS113). Inbreeding coefficient values for Turkish Grey Steppe, Eastern Anatolian Red, Anatolian Black and Holstein Friesian were 0.216, 0.202, 0.128 and 0.069, respectively. The lowest pairwise FST value (0.030) was detected between Turkish Grey Steppe and Anatolian Black breeds, while the highest value (0.070) was detected between Turkish Grey Steppe and Holstein Friesian. Results of structure and factorial correspondence analysis revealed that Turkish native cattle breeds and Holstein Friesian were genetically different enough to separate the two breeds. Results of bottleneck analysis indicated heterozygosity deficiency in Turkish Grey Steppe (P < 0.05).
Keywords: bovine; genetic characterization; indigenous population
Published: October 31, 2019 Show citation
References
- Agung P.P., Saputra F., Septian W.K., Lusiana, Zein M.S.A., Sulandari S., Anwar S., Wulandari A.S., Said S., Tappa B. (2016): Study of genetic diversity among Simmental cross cattle in West Sumatra based on microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29, 176-183.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Agung P.P., Saputra F., Zein M.S.A., Wulandari A.S., Putra W.P.B., Said S., Jakaria J. (2019): Genetic diversity of Indonesian cattle breeds on microsatellite markers. AsianAustralasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 32, 467-476.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Belkhir K., Borsa P., Chikhi L., Raufaste N., Bonhomme F. (2004): GENETIX 4.05, Windows software for population genetics. University of Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. (in French)
- Botstein D., White L.R., Skolnick M., Davis R.W. (1980): Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 32, 314-331.
- Devi K.S., Gupta B.R., Vani S. (2017): Genetic diversity and bottleneck studies in Punganur cattle through microsatellite markers. International Journal of Science, 6, 303-307.
- Earl D.A., vonHoldt B.M. (2012): STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A web-site and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4, 359-361.
Go to original source...
- El-Sayed M.A., Al-Sudy A., Teleb F. (2016): Assessment of genetic diversity among two Egyptian cattle populations (Bos taurus) based on autosomal microsatellite markers. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 53, 65-73.
Go to original source...
- Ertugrul M., Akin A.O., Yildirim M., Dellal G., Togan I., Pabuccuoglu S., Koyuncu M., Oner Y., Yilmaz O., Koncagul S., Pehlivan E., Elmaci C., Dag B., Ozder M. (2015): Conservation and Sustainable Use of Farm Animal Genetic Resources in Turkey. In: Conf. Proc. Turkey Agricultural Engineering VIII, Ankara, Turkey, 212-236. (in Turkish)
- Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2611-2620.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. (2005): Arlequin version 3.01: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 1, 47-50.
Go to original source...
- FAO (2011): Molecular Genetic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 9. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/i2413e/i2413e00.pdf (accessed July 9, 2019).
- Glaubitz J.C. (2004): A user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Molecular Ecology Resources, 4, 309-310.
Go to original source...
- Hartl D.L., Clark A.G. (2007): Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, USA.
- Hussain T., Babar M.E., Peters S.O., Wajid A., Ali A., Azam A., Ahmad Z., Wasim M., Ali A., Kizilkaya K., De Donato M., Imumorin I.G. (2016): Microsatellite markers based genetic evaluation of Pakistani cattle breeds. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48, 1633-1641.
- Luikart G., Cornuet J.M. (1998): Empiricial evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology, 12, 228-237.
Go to original source...
- Miller S., Dykes D., Plesky H.A. (1988): Simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 16, 1215.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nagamine Y., Nirasawa K., Takahashi H., Sasaki O., Ishii K., Minezawa M., Oda S., Visscher P.M., Furukawa T. (2008): Estimation of the time of divergence between Japanese Mishima Island cattle and other cattle populations using microsatellite DNA markers. Journal of Heredity, 99, 202-207.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nei M. (1987): Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
Go to original source...
- Ozkan E. (2005): An investigation on genetic structure of native and cultural cattle breeds in Turkey by using microsatellite markers. PhD Thesis, University of Trakya, Edirne, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Ozsensoy Y. (2011): Genetic characterization of some Turkish cattle breeds. PhD Thesis, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Ozsensoy Y., Kurar E., Dogan M., Bulut Z., Nizamioglu M., Altunok V., Isik A., Camlidag A. (2019): Phylogenetic relationships of native Turkish cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 43, 23-29.
Go to original source...
- Park S.D.E. (2001): Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. PhD Thesis, Dublin University, Dublin, Ireland.
- Piry S., Luikart G., Cornuet J.M. (1999): Bottleneck: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity, 90, 502-503.
Go to original source...
- Pritchard J.K., Matthew S., Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-995.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Suh S., Kim Y., Cho C., Byun M., Choi S., Ko Y., Lee C.W., Jung K., Bae K.H., Kim J. (2014): Assessment of genetic diversity, relationships and structure among Korean native cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences., 27, 1548-1553.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Tu P., Lin D., Li G., Huang J., Wang D., Wang P. (2014): Characterization of the genetic diversity and population structure for the yellow cattle in Taiwan based on microsatellite markers. Animal Biotechnology, 25, 234-249.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Villalobos Cortes A.I., Martinez A.M., Escobar C., Vega-Pla J.L., Delgado J.V. (2010): Study of genetic diversity of the Guaymi and Guabala bovine populations by means of microsatellites. Livestock Science, 131, 45-51.
Go to original source...
- Yeh F.C., Yang R.C., Boyle T.B.J., Ye Z.H., Mao J.X. (1997): POPGENE, the User Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
- Zeder M.A., Hesse B. (2000): The initial domestication of goats (Capra hircus) in the Zagros mountains 10,000 years ago. Science, 287, 2254-2257.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.