Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 59(7):319-326 | DOI: 10.17221/7533-CJAS

Effect of housing system on reproductive results in ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.)Original Paper

H. Kontecka, S. Nowaczewski, S. Krystianiak, M. Szychowiak, K. Kup¶
Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland

A comparative analysis of reproduction parameters and hatchability results of pheasants raised under two different housing systems (cages and aviaries) was performed. In the first system the pheasants were housed in 420 cages, 3780 from the total were females. In the second housing system, 3200 pheasant hens were placed in eight aviaries, where 50 cocks and 400 hens were kept in each. The following parameters were calculated: laying rate, the percentage of hatching, small and cracked eggs, hatchability from set and fertilized eggs, dead embryos up to day 8 of incubation and, finally, dead embryos after day 8 of incubation as well as unhatched, crippled, and weak chicks. The laying rate for the whole period of reproduction in pheasants kept in cages was significantly higher in comparison with aviaries (59.6 vs 27.2%). A higher (P ≤ 0.05) percentage of small and damaged eggs ( = 13.6) was recorded in aviaries. The percentage of dead embryos for eggs derived from aviaries, up to day 8 of incubation, was also significantly higher (-x = 4.7%). There were no significant differences between the housing systems with respect to the remaining features. The results of the investigation made it possible to conclude that pheasants kept in cages were characterized by a higher laying performance with fewer eggs unsuitable for incubation. A lower mortality of embryos during the incubation process was found in eggs derived from pheasants reared in cages. Although there were no significant differences between the analyzed housing systems in terms of hatchability, a higher laying rate for pheasants kept in cages implies that more chicks could be obtained from every female.

Keywords: gamebird; keeping; performance; reproduction

Published: July 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kontecka H, Nowaczewski S, Krystianiak S, Szychowiak M, Kup¶ K. Effect of housing system on reproductive results in ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.). Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014;59(7):319-326. doi: 10.17221/7533-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Deeming D.C., Hodges H.R., Cooper J.J. (2011): Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) II. Reproductive parameters. British Poultry Science, 52, 415-422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Demirel S., Kirikci K. (2009): Effect of different egg storage times on some egg quality characteristics and hatchability of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Poultry Science, 88, 440-444. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. De Reu K., Grijspeerdt K., Heyndrickx M., Zoons J., De Baere K., Uyttendaele M., Debevere J., Herman L. (2005): Bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and aviary housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 46, 149-155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. De Reu K., Rodenburg T.B., Grijspeerdt K., Messens W., Heyndrickx M., Tuyttens F.A.M., Sonck B., Zoons J., Herman L. (2009): Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison. Poultry Science, 88, 2442-2448. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Esen F., Ozbey O., Genc F. (2010): The effect of age on egg production, hatchability and egg quality characteristics in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9, 1237-1241. Go to original source...
  6. Guidobono Cavalchini L., Marelli S.P., Mangiagalli M.G. (2005): Effect of pheasant breeders management on eggs' fertility. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 4 (Suppl. 2), 510-512. Go to original source...
  7. Ipek A., Karabulut A., Yilmaz-Dikmen B. (2006): The effects of storage period on hatching characteristics of pheasant (P. colchicus) eggs. World's Poultry Science Journal, 62 (Suppl.), 529.
  8. Kirikci K., Tepeli C., Gunlu A., Cetin O. (2003): Production characteristics of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in different breeding regimes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 27, 907-910.
  9. Kozuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Rosinski A. (2009): Storage time and eggshell colour of pheasant eggs vs. the number of blastodermal cells and hatchability results. Folia Biologica (Kraków), 57, 121-130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Krystianiak S., Kozuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S. (2005): Quality and ultrastructure of eggshell and hatchability of eggs in relation to eggshell colour in pheasants. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23, 5-14.
  11. Krystianiak S., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Rosinski A. (2007): Laying characteristics of one- and two-year old pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.). Folia Biologica (Kraków), 55, 65-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ksiazkiewicz J., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S. (2006): Laying performance and qualitative and hatchability traits of eggs from geese of different phylogenetic origin. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki, 33, 71-80. (in Polish)
  13. Kucukyilmaz K., Bozkurt M., Herken E.N., Cinar M., Catli A.U., Bintas E., Coven F. (2012): Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotypes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25, 559-568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kuzniacka J., Bernacki Z., Adamski M. (2005): Effect of the date of egg-laying on the biological value of eggs and reproductive traits in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.). Folia Biologica (Kraków), 53 (Suppl.), 73-78. Go to original source...
  15. Ledvinka Z., Zita L., Klesalova L. (2012): Egg quality and some factors influencing it: a review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 43, 46-52.
  16. Lewko L., Gornowicz E. (2011): Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Annals of Animal Science, 11, 607-616. Go to original source...
  17. Matt D., Veromann E., Luik A. (2009): Effect of housing systems on biochemical composition of chicken eggs. Agronomy Research, 7 (Special Issue II), 662-667.
  18. Mroz E., Pudyszak K. (2000): Pheasant egg shell colour and its effect on hatchability. Applied Science Reports (Polish Society of Animal Production), 49, 459-466. (in Polish)
  19. Nowaczewski S., Kontecka H. (2005): Effect of dietary vitamin C supplement on reproductive performance of aviary pheasants. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50, 208-212. Go to original source...
  20. Nowaczewski S., Szablewski T., Cegielska-Radziejewska R., Stuper-Szablewska K., Rudzinska M., Lesnierowski G., Kontecka H., Szulc K. (2013): Biochemical and microbiological characteristics of pheasant eggs depends on eggshell colour and housing system. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 77, 226-233. Go to original source...
  21. Ozbey O., Esen F., Aysondu M.H. (2011): The effect of the age of the first egg-laying on the egg production, hatchability and egg quality of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10, 3196-3200.
  22. Roshdy M., Khalil H.A., Hanafy A.M., Mady M.E. (2010): Productive and reproductive traits of Japanese quail as affected by two housing system. Egypt Poultry Science, 30, 55-67.
  23. Suchy P., Strakova E., Vitula F. (2008): The effect of a diet supplemented with l-carnitine on egg production in pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 31-35. Go to original source...
  24. Zajac K. (1988): Outline of Statistical Methods. PWE, Warszawa, Poland.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.