Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2011, 56(5):242-249 | DOI: 10.17221/1429-CJAS

Effect of genotype, age of hens and K/k allele on eggshell quality

Z. Ledvinka1, L. Zita1, M. Hubený1, E. Tůmová1, M. Tyller2, P. Dobrovolný3, M. Hruška4
1 Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 DOMINANT CZ, Voleč, Lázně Bohdaneč, Czech Republic
3 Líheň Studenec s.r.o, Koněšín, Czech Republic
4 Faculty of Education, Biology Department, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

We assessed the influence of the particular genotype, age of layers, feather growth-rate gene, and their mutual interactions on selected indicators of eggshell quality in six groups of hens of the laying type Dominant. The following genotypes were examined in the experiment: Barred Plymouth Rock, Dominant BPR 951 (K) strain, slow-feathering; Barred Plymouth Rock, Dominant BPR 901 (k) strain, fast-feathering; Blue Plymouth Rock, Dominant BLPR 954 (K) strain, slow-feathering; Blue Plymouth Rock, Dominant BLPR 894 (k) strain, fast-feathering; crossbreds of the above strains in the F1 generation Dominant D 107 blue (K), slow-feathering and Dominant D 107 blue (k), fast-feathering. The layers were fed a feed mixture NP1 (16.64 % CP) from the 20th week of age and a feed mixture NP2 (15.02% CP) from the 42nd week. Husbandry conditions met the regular requirements of laying hens. Egg production and live weight of hens were monitored for the duration of the experiment (12 months). Eggshell quality was examined at the layers' age of 27, 35 and 56 weeks. The average hen-day egg production for the duration of the experiment (12 months) was not significantly influenced by the particular genotype or the feather growth-rate gene. The varying representation of the feather growth-rate gene significantly (P ≤ 0.001) influenced the live weight; similarly, the relationship between the genotype and the representation of K/k alleles was significant. The average egg weight was influenced statistically significantly (P ≤ 0.001) by the age of hens, their genotype (P ≤ 0.05), feather growth-rate gene (P ≤ 0.001), and the relationship between the age and genotype (P ≤ 0.001). The age of hens, genotype, and the interaction of these two factors affected the egg shape index, as did the incidence of the feather growth-rate gene within the population (with a statistical significance of P ≤ 0.001). The age, genotype and the feather growth-rate gene incidence within the population also significantly affected the eggshell quality indicators. In the eggshell to egg ratio, eggshell thickness and strength, an interaction was determined between the age of hens and their particular genotype. The eggshell colour was also significantly (P ≤ 0.001) affected by hens' age, genotype (P ≤ 0.001), as well as by the feather growth-rate gene (P ≤ 0.001). No significant interaction between the age and the genotype was found for this indicator.

Keywords: hens; laying type; age; genotype; K, k allele; eggshell quality

Published: May 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ledvinka Z, Zita L, Hubený M, Tůmová E, Tyller M, Dobrovolný P, Hruška M. Effect of genotype, age of hens and K/k allele on eggshell quality. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2011;56(5):242-249. doi: 10.17221/1429-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aksoy T., Yilmaz T., Tuna Y.T. (2001): The effect of oviposition time on egg quality and the possibility of estimating egg shell weight using a formula in commercial layers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Science, 25, 811-816.
  2. Arent E., Tůmová E., Ledvinka Z., Holoubek J. (1997): Influence of nutrition on egg quality in laying hens of different genotypes. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 42, 427-432. (in Czech)
  3. Buss E.G., Guyer R.B. (1982): Genetic differences in avian egg shell formation. Poultry Science, 61, 2048- 2055. Go to original source...
  4. Crawford R.D. (1990): Chapter 2: Poultry genetic resources: evolution, diversity, and conservation. Breeding. Chapter 32: Genetic variation in egg composition. Poultry breeding and genetics, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, 43-59, 781-798.
  5. Doyon G. M., Bernier-Cardou M., Hamilton R. M. G., Castai-Gne F., McClean H. (1985): Egg quality. 1. Shell strengths of eggs from five commercial strains of Leghorn hens during their first laying cycle. Poultry Science, 64, 1685-1689. Go to original source...
  6. Grunder A. A., Fairfull R. W., Hamilton R. M. G., Thompson B. K. (2008): Correlations between measure of eggshell quality or percentage of intact eggs and variol economic trans. Poultry Science, 70, 1855-1860. Go to original source...
  7. Hamilton R.M.G. (1982): Methods and factors that affect the measurement of eggshell quality. Poultry Science, 61, 2022-2039. Go to original source...
  8. Hamilton R.M.G., Hollands S.K.G., Voisey P.W., Grunder A.A. (1979): Relationship between egg shell quality and shell breakage and factors that affect shell breakage in the field - a review. Worlďs Poultry Science Journal, 35, 177-190. Go to original source...
  9. Harms R.H., Rossi A. F., Sloan D.R., Miles R.D., Christmas R.B. (1990): A method for estimating shell weight and correcting specific gravity for egg weight in eggshell quality studies. Poultry Science, 69, 48-52. Go to original source...
  10. Heil G., Hartmann W. (1997): Combined summaries of European random sample egg production tests completed in 1995 and 1996. Worlďs Poultry Science Journal, 53, 291-296. Go to original source...
  11. Hu Y.H., Liu S.Ch., Liao Y.W., Pau Ch.M., Hu Y.H., Liu S.C., Liao Y. W., Pau C.M. (2002): Studies on intra-line and intra-family varieties of green egg colour in Brown Tsaiya. Journal of Taiwan Livestock Research, 35, 231-240.
  12. Jelínek K. (1996): Defective shell - one of the problems in the production of eggs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 41, 375-379.
  13. Johnston S.A., Gous R.M. (2007): Modelling the changes in the proportions of the egg components during a laying cycle. British Poultry Science, 48, 347-353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Koga O., Fujihara N., Yoshimura Y. (1982): Scanning electron micrograph of surface structures of soft - shelled eggs laid by regularly laying hens. Poultry Science, 61, 403-407. Go to original source...
  15. Ledvinka Z., Tůmová E., Arent E., Holoubek J., Klesalová L. (2000): Egg shell quality in some white-egged and brown-egged crossbreed combinations of dominant hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 45, 285-288.
  16. Liu S. C., Chen D. T., Huang C. F., Hu Y. H. (2001): Selection for blue-shell eggs from Brown Tsaiya: I. Establishment of foundation stock. Journal of Taiwan Livestock Research, 34, 265-270.
  17. Mérat P., Coquerelle G., Durand L. (1992): Correlations phenotypique de charatéristiques de ľoeuf avec les propres performances de croissance oude ponte de la poule ou celles de sa descendance dans deux populations de type "oeuf brun". Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 56, 99-105.
  18. Odabasi A. Z., Miles R. D., Balaban M. O., Portier K. M. (2007): Changes in brown eggshell colour as the hen ages. Poultry Science, 86, 356-363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Pavlovski Z., Vitorovic D., Skrbic Z., Vracar S. (2000): Influence of limestone particle size in diets for hens and oviposition time on eggshell quality. Acta Veterinaria Beograd, 50, 37-42.
  20. Rizzi C., Chiericato G.M. (2005): Organic farming production. Effect of age on the productive yield and egg quality of hens of two commercial hybrid lines and two local breeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 4, 160-162. Go to original source...
  21. Roland D. A. (1984): Egg shell quality. I. The body-checked egg. Worlďs Poultry Science Journal, 40, 250-254. Go to original source...
  22. SAS Institute Inc. (2008): The SAS System for Windows. Release 9.2
  23. Tůmová E., Ledvinka Z. (2009): The effect of time of oviposition and age on egg weight, egg components weight and eggshell quality. Archiv für Gefl ügelkunde, 73, 110-115.
  24. Tůmová E., Zita L., Hubený M., Skřivan M., Ledvinka Z. (2007): The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52, 26-30. Go to original source...
  25. Tyller M., Holoubek J. (2003): Selection and breeding of poultry for breeding and small farm animals - one of the profitable sectors of poultry farming. In: IV. Ukrainian Poultry Conference with International Participation, 53, Kharkov, Ukraine, 143-145.
  26. Yannakopoulos A.L., Tserveni-Gousi A.S. (1987): Effect of egg weight and shell quality on day - old duckling weight. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 51, 157-159.
  27. Zhang L.C., Ning Z.H., Xu G.Y., Hou Z.C., Yang N. (2005): Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poultry Science, 84, 1209-1213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Zita L., Tůmová E., Štolc L. (2009): Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78, 85-91. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.