Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2010, 55(2):49-57 | DOI: 10.17221/26/2009-CJAS

Genome reprogramming during the first cell cycle in in vitro produced porcine embryos

I. Barnetová1,2, K. Okada3
1 Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, IAPG CAS, Liběchov, Czech Republic
3 Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan

Conflicting data still exist regarding the extent of paternal pronuclear DNA demethylation in one cell-stage mammalian embryos. Demethylation of paternal pronuclear DNA was observed in in vitro produced porcine zygotes, whereas in vitro produced embryos do not show any or only weak paternal genome demethylation. In our experiments, we have used and compared two in vitro techniques commonly used for in vitro embryo production (in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection) and then we evaluated the extent of labelling in both these groups after 5-methylcytosine (5-MeC) or dimethyl H3/K9 labelling. We have found no differences in the methylation pattern between both those techniques used for the production of embryos. Moreover, we did not detect any demethylation of paternal DNA after 5-MeC labelling at all. Contrary to this, labelling with dimethyl H3/K9 antibodies showed differences in labelling intensity between maternal and paternal genomes in 42% of zygotes after in vitro fertilization and in 44% of zygotes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Our results indicate that in vitro matured pig oocytes exhibit rather inconsistent methylation patterns. This inconsistency probably resulted from insufficient cytoplasmic maturation of oocytes and to a lesser extent from the in vitro technique for embryo production.

Keywords: Keywords: epigenetics; pig; ICSI; IVF; methylation

Published: February 28, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Barnetová I, Okada K. Genome reprogramming during the first cell cycle in in vitro produced porcine embryos. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2010;55(2):49-57. doi: 10.17221/26/2009-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Beaujean N., Hartshorne G., Cavilla J., Taylor J., Gardner J., Wilmut I., Meehan R., Young L. (2004): Non-conservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics. Current Biology, 14, R266-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bonk A.J., Li R., Lai L., Hao Y., Liu Z., Samuel M., Fergason E.A., Whitworth K.M., Murphy C.N., Antoniou E.,Prather R.S. (2008): Aberrant DNA methylation in porcine in vitro-, parthenogenetic-, and somatic cell nuclear transfer-produced blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 75, 250-264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dean W., Santos F., Stojkovic M., Zakhartchenko V., Walter J., Wolf E., Reik W. (2001): Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 13734-13738. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Fulka H., Fulka J. Jr. (2006): No differences in the DNA methylation pattern in mouse zygotes produced in vivo, in vitro, or by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1534-1536. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fulka H., Mrázek M., Teplá O., Fulka J. Jr. (2004): DNA methylation pattern in human zygotes and developing embryos. Reproduction, 128, 703-708. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Fulka H., St John J.C., Fulka J., Hozák P. (2008): Chromatin in early mammalian embryos: achieving the pluripotent state. Differentiation, 76, 3-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fulka J., Fulka H., Slavík T., Okada K., Fulka J. Jr. (2006): DNA methylation pattern in pig in vivo produced embryos. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 126, 213-217. Go to original source...
  8. Funahashi H. (2003): Polyspermic penetration in porcine IVM-IVF systems. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 15, 167-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gioia L., Barboni B., Turriani M., Capacchietti G., Pistilli M.G., Berardinelli P., Mattioli M. (2005): The capability of reprogramming the male chromatin after fertilization is dependent on the quality of oocyte maturation. Reproduction, 130, 29-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jeong Y.S., Yeo S., Park J.S., Koo D.B., Chang W.K., Lee K.K., Kang Y.K. (2007a): DNA methylation state is preserved in the sperm-derived pronucleus of the pig zygote. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 51, 707-714. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Jeong Y.S., Yeo S., Park J.S., Lee K.K., Kang Y.K. (2007b): Gradual development of a genome-wide H3-K9 trimethylation pattern in paternally derived pig pronucleus. Developmental Dynamics, 236, 1509-1516. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Katayama M., Sutovsky P., Yang B.S., Cantley T., Rieke A., Farwell R., Oko R., Day B.N. (2005): Increased disruption of sperm plasma membrane at sperm immobilization promotes dissociation of perinuclear theca from sperm chromatin after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in pigs. Reproduction, 130, 907-916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kren R., Kikuchi K., Nakai M., Miyano T., Ogushi S., Nagai T., Suzuki S., Fulka J., Fulka J. Jr. (2003): Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the pig: where is the problem? The Journal of Reproduction and Development, 49, 271-273. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Lachner M., Jenuwein T. (2002): The many faces of histone lysine methylation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 14, 286-298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Laurincik J., Rath D., Niemann H. (1994): Differences in pronucleus formation and first cleavage following in vitro fertilization between pig oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 102, 277-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lepikhov K., Zakhartchenko V., Hao R., Yang F., Wrenzycki C., Niemann H., Wolf E., Walter J. (2008): Evidence for conserved DNA and histone H3 methylation reprogramming in mouse, bovine and rabbit zygotes. Epigenetics Chromatin, 1, 8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Mayer W., Niveleau A., Walter J., Fundele R., Haaf T. (2000): Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature, 403, 501-502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. McLay D.W., Clarke H.J. (2003): Remodelling the paternal chromatin at fertilization in mammals. Reproduction, 125, 625-633. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Moor R.M., Trounson A.O. (1977): Hormonal and follicular factors affecting maturation of sheep oocytes in vitro and their subsequent developmental capacity. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 49, 101-109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Oswald J., Engemann S., Lane N., Mayer W., Olek A., Fundele R., Dean W., Reik W., Walter J. (2000): Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Current Biology, 10, 475-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Park J.S., Jeong Y.S., Shin S.T., Lee K.K., Kang Y.K. (2007): Dynamic DNA methylation reprogramming: active demethylation and immediate remethylation in the male pronucleus of bovine zygotes. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie, 236, 2523-2533. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Santos F., Peters A.H., Otte A.P., Reik W., Dean W. (2005): Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Developmental Biology, 280, 225-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Sega M.F., Lee K., Machaty Z., Cabot R. (2007): Pronuclear stage porcine embryos do not possess a strict asymmetric distribution of lysine 9 dimethylation of histone H3 based solely on parental origin. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 74, 2-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Shi W., Dirim F., Wolf E., Zakhartchenko V., Haaf T. (2004): Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 71, 340-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Strahl B.D., Allis C.D. (2000): The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 403, 41-45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Turner B.M. (2000): Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays, 22, 836-845. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Yang J., Yang S., Beaujean N., Niu Y., He X., Xie Y., Tang X., Wang L., Zhou Q., Ji W. (2007): Epigenetic marks in cloned rhesus monkey embryos: comparison with counterparts produced in vitro. Biology of Reproduction, 76, 36-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Yoshioka K., Suzuki C., Tanaka A., Anas I.M., Iwamura S. (2002): Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biology of Reproduction, 66, 112-119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Wang Z.G., Xu Z.R., Yu S.D. (2007): Effects of oocyte collection techniques and maturation media on in vitro maturation and subsequent embryo development in Boer goat. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52, 21-25. Go to original source...
  30. Zaitseva I., Zaitsev S., Alenina N., Bader M., Krivokharchenko A. (2007): Dynamics of DNA-demethylation in early mouse and rat embryos developed in vivo and in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 74, 1255-1261. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.