Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2006, 51(1):39-46 | DOI: 10.17221/3907-CJAS

Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Estimates of (co)variances due to direct and litter effects for fur coat and reproduction traits

H. Wierzbicki1, W. Jagusiak2
1 Agricultural University, Wroclaw, Poland
2 Agricultural University, Krakow, Poland

5 540 records of the arctic fox fur coat and reproductive traits collected in 1983-1999 were studied. The analyzed traits were: body size (BS), colour type (CT), colour purity (CP), coat density (CD), hair length (HL), general appearance (GA), total score (TS), skin length (SL), litter size at birth (LSB), litter size at weaning (LSW), number of dead pups (NPD), pup weight at weaning (PW), and pregnancy length (PL). (Co)variance components were estimated using a derivative-free algorithm of REML and a multi-trait animal model. Random effects were direct additive, common litter environment and residual. The genetic parameters for the fur coat traits (discrete characters) were estimated twice: using the original data set, and the data set in which the distribution of fur coat scores was normalised using a probit link function. Direct heritability estimates obtained from the original data set ranged from 0.108 for SL to 0.276 for HL, and were somewhat lower than those estimated using the transformed data set (they ranged from 0.109 for GA to 0.315 for CT). Reproductive traits were lowly heritable with direct heritabilities ranging from 0.060 for PW to 0.174 for LSB. Estimates of the portion of litter variation calculated from the original and transformed data set were comparable ranging from 0.045 for GA to 0.156 for CP, and from 0.059 for GA to 0.185 for TS, respectively. Genetic correlations between fur coat traits ranged from high favourable (0.948 between SL and BS, original data) to strong negative ones between CP and GA (-0.405, transformed data). High positive genetic correlations were found between LSB and LSW (0.954), and between LSB and NPD (0.783), whereas PL was negatively correlated with all other reproductive traits.

Keywords: arctic fox; fur coat traits; genetic parameters; normal probability scale transformation; reproductive traits

Published: January 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wierzbicki H, Jagusiak W. Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Estimates of (co)variances due to direct and litter effects for fur coat and reproduction traits. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2006;51(1):39-46. doi: 10.17221/3907-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Berg P. (1993a): Variation between and within populations of mink. I. Weight and skin length. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A. Anim. Sci., 43, 151-157. Go to original source...
    2. Berg P. (1993b): Present knowledge about heritability of different traits in mink. In: NJF-Forskermøde, 29 April 1993, 10 pp. Go to original source...
    3. Filistowicz A., ¯uk B., S³awoñ J. (1999a): Evaluation of factors determining prices of Polish arctic fox skins at the Helsinki International Auction. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 17, 209-219.
    4. Filistowicz A., Wierzbicki H., Zwoliñska-Bartczak I., ¯uk B. (1999b): Genetic parameters of conformation and coat traits in fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. J. Appl. Genet., 40, 211-217.
    5. Filistowicz A., Szwaczkowski T., ¯uk B., Piotrowski P., Przysiecki P. (1999c): Model of continues breeding value evaluation in the arctic fox population (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Przeg. Hod., 42, 35-43.
    6. Graser H.U., Smith S.P., Tier B. (1987): A derivative-free approach for estimating variance components in animal models by Restricted Maximum likelihood. J. Anim. Sci., 64, 1362-1370. Go to original source...
    7. Hansen B.K., Berg P. (2004): Stochastic simulation of breeding schemes to improve economic genetic merit in mink production. Scientifur, 28, 194-200.
    8. Jakubczak A. (2002): Evaluation of pastel fox breeding results in Poland - reproduction. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Animal Husbandry, 5, http://www.ejpau.media.pl
    9. Je¿ewska G., Tarkowski J., Niezgoda G., Jakubczak A. (1996): Phenotypic and genetic variability of some reproductive features in blue fox (Alopex lagopus). Anim. Prod. Review, Appl. Sci. Rep., Prog. Fur Anim. Sci., 27, 199-204.
    10. Johannessen K.R., Borsting E., Kristiansen H. (2000). Live grading as a tool in pelsdyrkontrollen. Scientifur, 24, 90-97.
    11. Kaufmann D., Hofer A., Bidanel J.P., Künzi N. (2000): Genetic parameters for individual birth and weaning weight and for litter size of Large White pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 117, 121-128. Go to original source...
    12. Kempthorne O., Nordskog A.W. (1959): Restricted selection indices. Biometrics, 15, 10-19. Go to original source...
    13. Kenttämies H. (1996): Genetic and environmental factors affecting fertility traits in foxes. Anim. Prod. Review, Appl. Sci. Rep., 27, 63-66.
    14. Lagerqvist G. (1997): Economic profit from increased litter size, body weight and pelt quality in mink (Mustela vision). Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A. Anim. Sci., 47, 57-63. Go to original source...
    15. Lagerqvist G., Johansson K., Lundeheim N. (1994): Selection for litter size, body weight and pelt quality in mink (Mustela vision). Correlated responses. J. Anim. Sci., 72, 1126-1137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Meyer K. (1998): DFREML User Notes version 3.0 β. Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    17. Peura J., Strandén I., Smeds K. (2003): Genetic parameters for fertility traits and animal size of blue fox (Alopex lagopus). NJF Seminar No. 354, NJF's subsection for fur animals, 8-10 October 2003, Lillehammer, Norway, 6 pp.
    18. Peura J., Serenius T., Strandén I. (2004a): Economic weights for liter size and skin character traits in Finnish blue fox production. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 22, 81-86.
    19. Peura J., Strandén I., Smeds K. (2004b): Genetics of litter size, age at first insemination and animal size in blue fox (Alopex lagopus). Scientifur, 28, 206-210.
    20. Socha S. (1994): Genetic parameters of fur traits and body size in arctic blue fox (Alopex lagopus L.) (in Polish, summary in English). Zesz. Nauk. Przeg. Hod., 15, 19-28.
    21. Socha S. (1996): Evaluation of breeding efficiency on a farm of arctic blue foxes Alopex lagopus (L.) (in Polish). Rozpr. WSR-P Siedlce, 43, 1-99.
    22. ¦laska B. (2002): Genetic and environmental factors of raccoon dog reproduction traits. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Animal Husbandry, 5, http://www.ejpau.media.pl
    23. Wierzbicki H. (2000): Additive genetic and error variance components for conformation and coat traits in arctic fox Alopex lagopus (L.). Scientifur, 24, 217-222.
    24. Wierzbicki H. (2004): Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Estimates of direct heritability and portion of litter variation of fur coat and reproduction traits. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49, 474-482. Go to original source...
    25. Wierzbicki H. (2005): Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Factors affecting pelt prices in the international trading system. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, 266- 272. Go to original source...
    26. Wierzbicki H., Filistowicz A. (2002): Single- and multitrait animal model in the silver fox evaluation. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 47, 268-274.
    27. Wierzbicki H., Filistowicz A., Jagusiak W. (2004): Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Statistical description of fur coat and reproduction traits - relationship and inbreeding. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49, 16-27. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content