Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2004, 49(8):357-372 | DOI: 10.17221/4320-CJAS

Main sources of the economic efficiency of beef cattle production systems

M. Wolfová, J. Wolf, R. Zahrádková, J. Přibyl, J. Daňo, J. Kica
1 , J. W 1, R. Z 1, J. P 1, J. D 2, J. K 2 1Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
2 Research Institute of Animal Production, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The economic efficiency of several beef production systems on pasture was investigated under different marketing strategies. All calculations were carried out with the computer program ECOWEIGHT. None of the considered production systems was profitable without government subsidies for the assumed economic input values. The subsidies granted when satisfying a set of conditions served for balancing the economic loss in systems selling all surplus weaned calves outside. A profitability of 10 to 25% was reached for this marketing strategy in dependence on the production system. When integrating feedlot, only the purebred system with mating female replacement at an early age (about 15 months) and selling breeding bulls showed profitability, but at a low level (5%). All other systems produced at a loss even when government subsidies were included. A detailed analysis showed a high variability of the profit and profitability of cow-calf production systems in dependence on breeding and marketing strategies and on the level of the biological and economic input parameters. When considering biological performance, reproduction of females was shown to be the main source of economic efficiency in herds producing calves for sale. When applying feedlot, the daily gain in fattening was even more important. Beef prices seem to be the most important economic factor influencing the profitability of all systems (prices for slaughtered animals in the variant with integrated feedlot, prices for calves in the variant with selling of weaned surplus progeny).

Keywords: beef cattle; production systems; marketing strategies; economic efficiency; profit

Published: August 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wolfová M, Wolf J, Zahrádková R, Přibyl J, Daňo J, Kica J. Main sources of the economic efficiency of beef cattle production systems. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2004;49(8):357-372. doi: 10.17221/4320-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AFCR (1993): Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants (an advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients). CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 159 pp.
    2. Albera A., Carnier P., Groen A.F. (2002): Economic values for beef traits in Piemontese ca le. In: Proceedings of the 7th WCGALP, Montpellier (CD-ROM), Com. No. 02-22.
    3. Amer P.R., Roughsedge T., Simm G. (2002): Cow herd population dynamics in a model for economic comparison of beef breeds and crossing systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th WCGALP, Montpellier (CD-ROM), Com. No. 23-21.
    4. Archer A.A., Meszaros S.A., Kinghorn B.P. (2002): Using so systems methodology to help model beef production systems as supply chains. In: Proceedings of the 7th WCGALP, Montpellier (CD-ROM), Com. No. 28-23.
    5. Chambaz A., Scheeder M.R.L., Kreuzer M., Dufey P.-A. (2003): Meat quality of Angus, Simmental, Charolais and Limousin steers compared at the same intramuscular fat content. Meat Sci., 63, 491-500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Daňo J., Huba J., Kica J., Hetényi L. (2001): Economic possibilities of breeding the suckling cow population in Slovakia. Agric. Econ., 47, 247-254.
    7. Davis K.C., Tess M.W., Kress D.D., Doornbos D.E., Anderson D.C. (1994): Life cycle evaluation of five biological types of beef ca le in a cow-calf range production system: I. Model development. J. Anim. Sci., 72, 2585-2590. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Feuz D.M., Umberger W.J. (2003): Beef cow-calf production. Vet. Clin. Food Anim., 19, 339-363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Fox D.G., Sniffen C.J., O'Connor J.D., Russell J.B., Van Soest P.J. (1990): A model for predicting ca le requirements and feedstuff utilization. In: The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluation ca le diets. Search Agriculture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. No. 34, 7-83.
    10. Fuerst-Waltl B., Willam A., Sölkner J. (2002): Optimization of a specialized beef breeding program with a crossbreeding component. Arch. Tierz., 45, 433-441. Go to original source...
    11. Golda J., Šubrt J., Švéda J. (2001): Výrobní, ekologické a ekonomické aspekty chovu krav bez tržní produkce. Výzkum v chovu skotu, 53, 1-9.
    12. Hradecká E. (2002): Odhady plemenné hodnoty pro obtížnost telení. [Thesis.] ZF JU v Českých Budějovicích. 144 pp.
    13. Jakubec V., Schlote W., Říha J., Majzlík I. (2003): Comparison of growth traits of eight beef ca le breeds in the Czech Republic. Arch. Tierz., 46, 143-153. Go to original source...
    14. Kahi A.K., Kosgey I.S., Cardoso V.L., Van Arendonk J.A.M. (1998): Influence of production circumstances and economic evaluation criteria on economic comparison of breeds and breed crosses. J. Dairy Sci., 81, 2271-2279. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Kudrna V. (1998): Produkce krmiv a výživa skotu. Agrospoj, Praha. 362 pp.
    16. Kvapilík J. (1995): Ekonomické aspekty chovu skotu. Czech Pied Ca le Breeding Association, Prague, 67 pp.
    17. Kvapilík J. (2000): Ekonomika chovu základního stáda. In: Masný skot, Agrospoj, Praha. 180-184.
    18. Kvapilík J., Frelich J., Golda J. (1997): Ekonomické aspekty chovu krav bez tržní produkce mléka. Zeměd. Ekon., 43, 289-296.
    19. Laster D.B., Glimp H.A., Cundiff L.V., Gregory K.E. (1973): Factors affecting dystocia and the effects of dystocia on subsequent reproduction in beef ca le. J. Anim. Sci., 36, 695-705. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Mark D.R., Jones R., Mintert J. (2002): Seasonal trends in steer feeding profits, prices and performance. MF2547. Manhattan (KS): Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
    21. Mintert J. (2003): Beef feedlot industry. Vet. Clin. Food Anim., 19, 387-395. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. NRC (2000): Nutrient requirements of beef ca le. Subcommi ee on Beef Ca le Nutrition, Commi ee on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agriculture, 7th rev. ed. Update 2000, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 232 pp.
    23. Peel D.S. (2003): Beef ca le growing and backgrounding programs. Vet. Clin. Food Anim., 19, 365-385. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Petrikovič P., Sommer A. (2002): Potreba živín pre hovädzí dobytok. Publikácie VÚŽV Nitra, No. 6, 30 pp. Go to original source...
    25. Přibyl J., Misztal I., Přibylová J., Šeba K. (2003): Muliplebreed, multiple-traits evaluation of beef ca le in the Czech Republic. Czech. J. Anim. Sci., 48, 519-532.
    26. Roughsedge T., Amer P.R., Simm G. (2002): Optimum replacement strategies for suckler cow beef herds. In: Proceedings of the 7th WCGALP, Montpellier (CDROM), Com. No. 23-24.
    27. Roughsedge T., Thompson R., Villanueva B., Simm G. (2001): Synthesis of direct and maternal genetic components of economically important traits from beef breed-cross evaluations. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 2307-2319. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Ruvuna F., Taylor J.F., Walter J.P., Turner J.W., Thallman R.M. (1992): Bioeconomic evaluation of embryo transfer in beef production systems. 1. Description of a biological model for steer production. J. Anim. Sci., 70, 1077-1083. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Říha J., Jakubec V., Golda J., Majzlík I. (2001): Comparison of preweaning growth traits of six beef ca le breeds in the Czech Republic. Czech. J. Anim. Sci., 46, 152-158.
    30. Schäfer C.S., Tholen E., Trappmann W. (1998): Untersuchungen zur Zuchtplanung bei Fleischrindern am Beispiel des Fleischrinder-Herdbuches Bonn e.V. 1. Mitteilung: Zuchtprogramm, Zuchtziel, Leistungsprüfungen, Schätzung genetischer Parameter. Züchtungskunde, 70, 157-171.
    31. Sommer A., Čerešňáková Z., Frydrych Z., Králík O., Králíková Z., Krása A., Pajtáš M., Petrikovič P., Pozdíšek J., Šimek M., Třináctý J., Vencl B., Zeman L. (1994): Potřeba živin a tabulky výživné hodnoty krmiv pro přežvýkavce. ČAZV Pohořelice, 196 pp.
    32. Šeba K. (2002): Výsledky kontroly užitkovosti masného skotu za rok 2001. Český svaz chovatelů masného skotu, Praha, 56 s.
    33. Teslík V., Bartoň L., Bureš D., Herrmann H., Martinkova Z., Kvapilík J., Zahrádková R. (2001): Management stáda masného skotu. UZPI, Praha. 56 s.
    34. Tess M.W., Kolstad B.W. (2000): Simulation of cow-calf production systems in a range environment: I. Model evaluation. J. Anim. Sci., 78, 1170-1180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Vencl B., Frydrych Z., Krása A., Pospíšil R., Pozdíšek J., Sommer A., Šimek M., Zeman L. (1991): Nové systémy hodnocení krmiv pro skot. Sborník AZV ČSFR No. 148, Prague, 134 pp.
    36. Vrchlabský J., Golda J. (2000): Klasifikace těl jatečných zvířat. Maso, 11, 12-17.
    37. Wood P.D.P. (1967): Algebraic model of the lactation curve in ca le. Nature, 216, 164-165. Go to original source...
    38. Wolf J., Wolfová M., Krupa E., Peškovičová D. (2004): ECOWEIGHT 1.0 - a C program for modelling the economic efficiency of production systems in beef ca le. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (submi ed).
    39. Wolfová M., Wolf J., Přibyl J., Zahrádková R., Kica J. (2004): Breeding objectives for beef bulls used in different production systems: model development. Livest. Prod. Sci. (submi ed).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content