Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2025, 70(6):234-241 | DOI: 10.17221/69/2025-CJAS

Genomic diversity characteristics of sheep populations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Serbia and MontenegroOriginal Paper

Gábor Mészáros ORCID...1, Birgit Fürst-Waltl ORCID...1, Johann Sölkner ORCID...1, Hana Vostrá-Vydrová ORCID...2, Jan Calta ORCID...2, Milena Đokić3, Božidarka Marković ORCID...3, Dragan Stanojević ORCID...4, Vladan Bogdanovic ORCID...4, Nina Moravčíková ORCID...5, Monika Chalupková5, Adrián Halvoník ORCID...5, Radovan Kasarda ORCID...5, Luboš Vostrý ORCID...2
1 University of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2 Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
4 Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belegrade, Serbia
5 Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Monitoring the genetic diversity in livestock is a critical component for sustainable management of small and endangered breeds. In this paper we follow up the two most often used metrics of genetic diversity, the average inbreeding coefficients (F) and the effective population (Ne) size in 16 sheep breeds from four countries. The analysis was based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, with about 35 to 49 thousand SNPs and 19 to 98 individuals after quality control. The runs of homozygosity (ROH) method with the cgaTOH software was used to estimate FROH, for three different time points in the past (3, 6 and 12 generations before present). Three methods were implemented to estimate Ne, using the NeEstimator v2, GONE and CurrentNe software for different time spans in the past. The average FROH ranged between 0.001 and 0.035 for 3 generations, 0.003 and 0.059 for 6 generations, 0.005 and 0.074 for 12 generations in the past. The wide range of inbreeding coefficients might be a consequence of different population sizes and breed management strategies in the respective countries. The results for Ne ranged from 7 to 352 for NeEstimator, 25 to 303 for GONE, and 15 to 542 for CurrentNe. Overall, the software showed comparable results for 10 out of 16 breeds, and significantly different results for at least one software for at least one of the methods for 6 out of 16 breeds. These differences show a degree of uncertainty in Ne estimations for certain breeds. Overall, we suggest the continued monitoring of sheep breeds, ideally by routine genotyping in all populations. This monitoring is especially important for small breeds with a greater decline in genetic diversity.

Keywords: conservation status; genomic inbreeding; effective population size

Received: May 16, 2025; Accepted: June 5, 2025; Prepublished online: June 27, 2025; Published: June 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mészáros G, Fürst-Waltl B, Sölkner J, Vostrá-Vydrová H, Calta J, Đokić M, et al.. Genomic diversity characteristics of sheep populations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Serbia and Montenegro. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2025;70(6):234-241. doi: 10.17221/69/2025-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Akdemir D, Sanchez JI. Efficient breeding by genomic mating. Front Genet. 2016 Nov 29;7:210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Amandykova M, Akhatayeva Z, Kozhakhmet A, Kapassuly T, Orazymbetova Z, Yergali K, Khamzin K, Iskakov K, Dossybayev K. Distribution of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with candidate genes for productivity in Kazakh meat-wool sheep breed. Genes. 2023 Oct 25;14(11):1988. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Antonios S, Rodriguez-Ramilo ST, Aguilar I, Astruc JM, Legarra A, Vitezica ZG. Genomic and pedigree estimation of inbreeding depression for semen traits in the Basco-Bearnaise dairy sheep breed. J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):3221-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford MW. SNeP: A tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet. 2015 Mar 20;6:109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Curik I, Ferencakovic M, Solkner J. Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem. Livest Sci. 2014 Aug;166:26-34. Go to original source...
    7. Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR. NeEstimator v2: Re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jan;4(1):209-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Drzaic I, Orehovac V, Moravcikova N, Shihabi M, Curik I, Vostry L, Kasarda R, Solkner J, Cubric-Curik V. Genomic characterization and diversity of indigenous goat breeds from Croatia. Livest Sci. 2024 Jan;279:105388. Go to original source...
    9. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. UK: Longman; 1996. 448 p.
    10. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: Animal recording for medium input production environment. Rome: FAO; 1998.
    11. Ferencakovic M, Solkner J, Curik I. Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: Effects of SNP density and genotyping errors. Genet Sel Evol. 2013 Oct 29;45(1):42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Hill WG. Estimation of effective population size from data on linked genes. Adv Appl Probab. 1981 Jul 1;13(1):[4]. Go to original source...
    13. Leroy G, Mary-Huard T, Verrier E, Danvy S, Charvolin E, Danchin-Burge C. Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genet Sel Evol. 2013 Jan 2;45(1):1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Machova K, Milerski M, Rychtarova J, Hofmanova B, Vostra-Vydrova H, Moravcikova N, Kasarda R, Vostry L. Assessment of the genetic diversity of Two Czech autochthonous sheep breeds. Small Rum Res. 2021 Feb;195:106301. Go to original source...
    15. Machova K, Marina H, Arranz JJ, Pelayo R, Rychtarova J, Milerski M, Vostry L, Suarez-Vega A. Genetic diversity of two native sheep breeds by genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Animal. 2023 Jan;17(1):100690. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. McQuillan R, Leutenegger AL, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin CS, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L, Smolej-Narancic N, Janicijevic B, Polasek O, Tenesa A, Macleod AK, Farrington SM, Rudan P, Hayward C, Vitart V, Rudan I, Wild SH, Dunlop MG, Wright AF, Campbell H, Wilson JF. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Sep;83(3):359-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Meszaros G, Boison SA, Perez O'Brien AM, Ferencakovic M, Curik I, Da Silva MV, Utsunomiya YT, Garcia JF, Solkner J. Genomic analysis for managing small and endangered populations: A case study in Tyrol Grey cattle. Front Genet. 2015 May 13;6:173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Nishio M, Inoue K, Ogawa S, Ichinoseki K, Arakawa A, Fukuzawa Y, Okamura T, Kobayashi E, Taniguchi M, Oe M, Ishii K. Comparing pedigree and genomic inbreeding coefficients, and inbreeding depression of reproductive traits in Japanese Black cattle. BMC Genomics. 2023 Jul 5;24(1):376. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Novo I, Ordas P, Moraga N, Santiago E, Quesada H, Caballero A. Impact of population structure in the estimation of recent historical effective population size by the software GONE. Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Dec 4;55(1):86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Rodriguez-Ramilo ST, Elsen JM, Legarra A. Inbreeding and effective population size in French dairy sheep: Comparison between genomic and pedigree estimates. J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):4227-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Santiago E, Novo I, Pardinas AF, Saura M, Wang J, Caballero A. Recent demographic history inferred by high-resolution analysis of linkage disequilibrium. Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Dec 16;37(12):3642-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Santiago E, Caballero A, Kopke C, Novo I. Estimation of the contemporary effective population size from SNP data while accounting for mating structure. Mol Ecol Resour. 2024 Jan;24(1):e13890. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Schaler J, Kruger B, Thaller G, Hinrichs D. Comparison of ancestral, partial, and genomic inbreeding in a local pig breed to achieve genetic diversity. Conser Genet Resour. 2020 Aug 3;12:77-86. Go to original source...
    24. Sedighi M, Ghahremani S, Javanmard A. [Genomic application in sheep and goat breeding]. Prof J Domest. 2019 Dec;19(2):39-47. Arabic.
    25. Smaragdov MG. Identification of homozygosity-rich regions in the Holstein genome. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii. 2023 Sep;27(5):471-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Vostry L, Vostra-Vydrova H, Moravcikova N, Kasarda R, Margetin M, Rychtarova J, Drzaic I, Shihabi M, Cubric-Curik V, Solkner J, Curik I. Genomic analysis of conservation status, population structure, and admixture in local Czech and Slovak dairy goat breeds. J Dairy Sci. 2024 Oct;107(10):8205-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Vostry L, Vostra-Vydrova H, Moravcikova N, Kasarda R, Cubric-Curik V, Brzakova M, Solkner J, Shihabi M, Moreno JAH, Spehar M, Curik I. Genomic diversity and population structure of the Czech Holstein cattle. Livest Sci. 2023 Jul;273:105261. Go to original source...
    28. Wang J, Santiago E, Caballero A. Prediction and estimation of effective population size. Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Oct;117(4):193-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Waples RS, Antao T, Luikart G. Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size. Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):769-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Waples RS, Do C. ldne: A program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jul;8(4):753-56. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Waples RS, England PR. Estimating contemporary effective population size on the basis of linkage disequilibrium in the face of migration. Genetics. 2011 Oct;189(2):633-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Wright S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat. 1922 Jul-Aug;56(645):330-8. Go to original source...
    33. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Zhang L, Orloff MS, Reber S, Li S, Zhao Y, Eng C. cgaTOH: Extended approach for identifying tracts of homozygosity. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Zhang P, Qiu X, Wang L, Zhao F. Progress in genomic mating in domestic animals. Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;12(18):2306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content