Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2018, 63(6):237-246 | DOI: 10.17221/54/2017-CJAS

Genetic analysis of the Hungarian population of endangered Hucul horsesOriginal Paper

Enikő Somogyvári, János Posta*, Sándor Mihók
Department of Animal Breeding, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

The population genetic evaluation of the Hungarian Hucul horse population was performed based on pedigree records. Herd book data of registered Hucul horses available up to 2016 were analysed using ENDOG (Gutierrez and Goyache 2005) and POPREP (Groeneveld et al. 2009) on the whole population (WP) as well as on the reference stock (RS) (breeding stock registered in 2016). Inbreeding coefficients were 5.57% (WP) and 7.18% (RS). Average relatedness was 10.39% in WP and higher in RS (12.67%). Effective population size was 52.32. Generation interval was 13.01 years for WP and 10.99 years for RS. The values for equivalent complete generations were 6.07 and 8.75, for the maximum number of generations 14.11 and 19.16, and for the number of full generations traced 3.77 and 5.50 for WP and RS, respectively. The effective number of founders (fe) was 23 both for WP and RS. The effective number of ancestors (fa) was 20 in WP and lower in RS (16). The fa/fe ratio was 0.869 in WP and 0.696 in RS. Founder genome equivalent (fg) was 9.618 in WP and 5.790 in RS. The fg/fe ratio was 0.481 in WP and 0.361 in RS. The study revealed that both the inbreeding coefficient and the average relatedness were high. The above mentioned ratios indicated loss of genetic diversity in the Hungarian Hucul population.

Keywords: genetic diversity; pedigree analysis; genetic protection; endangered breed

Published: June 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Somogyvári E, Posta J, Mihók S. Genetic analysis of the Hungarian population of endangered Hucul horses. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2018;63(6):237-246. doi: 10.17221/54/2017-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alvarez J., Royo L.J., Perrez-Pardal L., Fernandez I., Payeras L., Goyache F. (2010): Assessing losses of genetic variability in the endangered Mallorqui horse. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55, 456-462. Go to original source...
  2. Avdi M., Banos G. (2008): Genetic diversity and inbreeding in the Greek Skyros horse. Livestock Science, 114, 362-365. Go to original source...
  3. Ballou J.D., Lacy R.C. (1995): Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. In: Ballou J.D., Gilpin M., Foose T.J. (eds): Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Management. Columbia University Press, New York, 76-111.
  4. Boichard D., Maignel L., Verrier E. (1997): The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics Selection Evolution, 29, 5-23. Go to original source...
  5. Bokor A., Jonas D., Nagy I., Bokor J., Szabari M. (2013): Pedigree analysis of Hungarian Thoroughbred population. Livestock Science, 151, 1-10. Go to original source...
  6. Caballero A., Toro M.A. (2000): Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetics Research, 75, 331-343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cervantes I., Goyache F., Molina A., Valera M., Gutierrez J.P. (2008): Application of individual increase in inbreeding to estimate effective sizes from real pedigrees. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 125, 301-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Colleau J.J. (2002): An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients. Genetics Selection Evolution, 34, 409-421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Curik I., Zechner P., Solkner J., Achmann R., Bodo I., Dovc P., Kavar T., Marti E., Brem G. (2003): Inbreeding, microsatellite, heterozygosity, and morpological traits in Lipizzan horses. Journal of Heredity, 94, 125-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Druml T., Baumun R., Solkner J. (2009): Pedigree analysis in the Austrian Noriker draught horse: genetic diversity and the impact of breeding for coat colour on population structure. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 126, 348-356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Dunner S., Checa M.L., Gutierrez J.P., Martin J.P., Canon J. (1998): Genetic analysis and management in small populations: the Asturcon pony as an example. Genetics Selection Evolution, 30, 397-405. Go to original source...
  12. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F. (1996): Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Green, Harlow, UK.
  13. Frankham R., Ballou J.D., Briscoe D.A. (2002): Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Go to original source...
  14. Glazewska I., Jezierski T. (2004): Pedigree analysis of Polish Arabian horses based on founder contributions. Livestock Production Science, 90, 293-298. Go to original source...
  15. Groeneveld E., Westhuizen B.V.D., Maiwashe A., Voordewind F., Ferraz J.B.S. (2009): POPREP: a generic report for population management. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8, 3, 1158-1178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Gutierrez J.P., Goyache F. (2005): A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 122, 172-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Gutierrez J.P., Cervantes I., Goyache F. (2009): Improving the estimation of realized effective population sizes in farm animals. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 126, 327-332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. James J.W. (1962): The spread of genes in random mating control population. Genetics Research, 3, 1-10. Go to original source...
  19. James J.W. (1971): The founder effect and response to artificial selection. Genetics Research, 16, 241-250. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. James J.W. (1972): Computation of genetic contributions from pedigrees. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 42, 272-273. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. James J.W. (1977): A note on selection differentials and generation length when generations overlap. Animal Production, 24, 109-112. Go to original source...
  22. Lacy R.C. (1989): Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. Zoo Biology, 8, 111-123. Go to original source...
  23. MacCluer J.W., Van de Berg J.L., Read B., Ryder O.A. (1986): Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biology, 5, 147-160. Go to original source...
  24. Mackowski M., Mucha S., Cholewinski G., Cieslak J. (2015): Genetic diversity in Hucul and Polish primitive horse breeds. Archives Animal Breeding, 58, 23-31. Go to original source...
  25. Maignel L., Boichard D., Verrier E. (1996): Genetic variability of French dairy breeds estimated from pedigree information. Interbull Bulletin, 14, 49-54.
  26. Martin de la Rosa A.J., Cervantes I., Gutierrez J.P. (2016): Equivalent effective population size mating as a useful tool in the genetic management of the Ibicenco rabbit breed (Conill Pages d'Eivissa). Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 108-116. Go to original source...
  27. Pinheiro M., Kjollerstrom H.J., Oom M.M. (2013): Genetic diversity and demographic structure of the endangered Sorraia horse breed assessed through pedigree analysis. Livestock Science, 152, 1-10. Go to original source...
  28. Pjontek J., Kadlecik O., Kasarda R., Horny M. (2012): Pedigree analysis in four Slovak endangered horse breeds. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 54-64. Go to original source...
  29. Royo L.J., Alvarez I., Gutierrez J.P., Fernandez I., Goyache F. (2007): Genetic variability in the endangered Asturcón pony assessed using genealogical and molecular information. Livestock Science, 107, 162-169. Go to original source...
  30. Sevinga M., Vrijenhoek T., Hesselink J.W., Barkema H.W., Groen A.F. (2004): Effect of inbreeding on the incidence of retained placenta in Friesian horses. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 982-986. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Solkner J., Filipcic L., Hampshire N. (1998): Genetic variability of populations and similarity of subpopulations in Austrian cattle breeds determined by analysis of pedigrees. Animal Science, 67, 249-256. Go to original source...
  32. Valera M., Molina A., Gutierrez J.P., Gomez J., Goyache F. (2005): Pedigree analysis in the Andalusian horse: population structure, genetic variability and influence of the Carthusian strain. Livestock Production Science, 95, 57-66. Go to original source...
  33. Vigh Zs., Csato L., Nagy I. (2008): Application of pedigree analysis in the animal breeding programs. (Hungarian Journal of) Animal Production, 57, 549-564. (in Hungarian)
  34. Vostra-Vydrova H., Vostry L., Hofmanova B., Krupa E., Zavadilova L. (2016): Pedigree analysis of the endangered Old Kladruber horse population. Livestock Science, 185, 17-23. Go to original source...
  35. Vostry L., Capkova Z., Pribyl J., Hofmanova B., Vydrova H.V., Mach K. (2011): Population structure of Czech cold-blooded breeds of horses. Archives Animal Breeding, 54, 1-9. Go to original source...
  36. Wright S. (1922): Coefficients of inbreeding and relationhip. American Neptune, 56, 330-333. Go to original source...
  37. Wright S. (1931): Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Zechner P., Solkner J., Bodo I., Drum T., Baumung R., Achmann R., Marti E., Habe F., Brem G. (2002): Analysis of diversity and population structure in the Lipizzan horse breed based on pedigree information. Livestock Production Science, 77, 137-146. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.