Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2017, 62(8):339-346 | DOI: 10.17221/96/2016-CJAS

Amino acid levels in muscle tissue of eight meat cattle breedsOriginal Paper

Josef Vopálenský1, Pavel Suchý1, Eva Straková*,2, František Šimek3, Miroslav Macháček1, Ivan Herzig2
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Agrokomplex Šumava, Prachatice, Czech Republic

Ten clinically healthy bulls equal in weight were chosen from eight meat cattle breeds maintained in the same geographical conditions using the extensive grazing method. After slaughtering, muscle tissue samples were taken from the musculus longissimus and pars thoracis, and dry matter, nitrogenous substances, fat, and the levels of essential (EAAs) and non-essential (NEAAs) amino acids were determined. Significant differences were found between the monitored genotypes in the contents of dry matter, nitrogenous substances, fat, EAAs, and NEAAs (P ≤ 0.05). The highest concentrations of nitrogenous substances in muscle tissue were detected in the Limousine breed and the lowest in the Aberdeen Angus breed; the highest fat content was found in Aberdeen Angus and the lowest in Galloway. Out of the total sum of EAAs, the highest percentage in the dry matter of muscle tissue in all genotypes was found for Lys (8.8-10.4%), the lowest percentage was found for Met (2.4-2.9%). The value of Thr was approximately 4.6, Val 5.1, Ile 4.8, Leu 8.2, Phe 4.1, His 4.2, and Arg 8.0%. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the monitored breeds were found in all EAAs, except for Val and Leu. Regarding NEAAs, out of the total protein, the highest percentage was found for Glu (13.9-15.1%). Conversely, the lowest values were detected for Ser (3.8-4.1%) and Tyr (3.8-4.4%). The values of other NEAAs were approximately 9.3 for Asp, 4.0 for Ser, 5.3 for Pro, 5.5 for Gly, and 6.1% for Ala. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were found between the monitored genotypes in all NEAAs except for Pro and Ala. In the dry matter of muscle tissue, out of the total protein, the sum of EAAs ranged from 50.6 (Meat Simmental) to 52.0% (Limousine), and NEAAs ranged from 48.0 (Limousine) to 49.4% (Meat Simmental). Apart from its effect on the biological value of meat, representation of individual amino acids is important to enhance its taste or smell.

Keywords: meat cattle breeds; musculus longissimus dorsi; dry matter; protein; fat; essential and non-essential amino acids

Published: August 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vopálenský J, Suchý P, Straková E, Šimek F, Macháček M, Herzig I. Amino acid levels in muscle tissue of eight meat cattle breeds. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2017;62(8):339-346. doi: 10.17221/96/2016-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. AOAC (2006): Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18 th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, USA.
  2. Applegate T.J., Angel R. (2008): Protein and amino acid requirements for poultry. Purdue University Extension Publication AS-581-W. Available from http://www.puyallup.wsu.edu/dairy/nutrient-management/default.asp (accessed Sep 1, 2016).
  3. Barabas J. (1987): Biological value of some proteins of animal provenience. Agriculture, 33, 686-691. (in Czech)
  4. Baker D.H. (1997): Ideal amino acid profiles for swine and poultry and their application in feed formulation. BioKyowa Technical Review, 9, 1-24.
  5. Chaudhari N., Landin A.M., Roper S.D. (2000): A novel metabotropic glutamate receptor functions as a taste receptor. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 113-119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Feidt C., Petit A., Bruas-Reignier F., Brun-Bellut J. (1996): Release of free amino-acids during ageing in bovine meat. Meat Science, 44, 19-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fujimura S., Kadowaki M. (2006): Improvement of meat taste by dietary components. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Niigata University, 58, 151-153.
  8. Hanzelkova S., Simeonovova J., Hampel D., Dufek A., Subrt J. (2011): The effect of breed, sex and aging time on tenderness of beef meat. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 80, 191-196. Go to original source...
  9. Hollo G., Csapo J., Szucs E., Tozser J., Repa I., Hollo I. (2001): Influence of breed, slaughter weight and gender on chemical composition of beef. Part 1. Amino acid profile and biological value of proteins. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 14, 1555-1559. Go to original source...
  10. Hollo G., Nuernberg K., Hollo I., Csapo J. Seregi J., Repa I., Ender K. (2007): Effect of feeding on the composition of longissmus muscle of Hungarian Grey and Holstein Friesian bulls. III. Amino acid composition and mineral content. Archiv fur Tierzucht, 50, 575-586. Go to original source...
  11. Ito R.H., Valero M.V., do Prado R.M., Rivaroli D.C., Perotto D., do Prado I.N. (2012): Meat quality from four genetic groups of bulls slaughtered at 14 months old. Acta Scientiarum, Animal Sciences, 34, 425-432. Go to original source...
  12. Jeong D., Oh M.R., Seong P.N., Cho S., Kang G.H., Kim J.H., Jeong S.G., Lee J.S, Park B.Y. (2012): Comparison of meat quality traits, free amino acid and fatty acid on longissimus lumborum muscles from Hanwoo, Holstein and Angus steers, fattened in Korea. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 32, 591-597. Go to original source...
  13. Kato H., Rhue M.R., Nishimura T. (1989): Role of free amino acids and peptides in food taste. In: Teranishi R., Buttery R.G., Shahidi F. (eds): Flavor Chemistry: Trends and Developments. ACS Symposium Series, 388, 158-174. Go to original source...
  14. Kluth H., Gabel M., Voigt J., Schonhusen U. (2000): The efficiency of utilization of intestinal digestible indispensable amino acids in growing bulls. Archiv fur Tierzucht, 43, 621-631. (in German)
  15. Koutsidis G., Elmore J.S., Oruna-Concha M.J., Campo M.M., Wood J.D., Mottram D.S. (2008): Water-soluble precursors of beef flavour, I. Effect of diet and breed. Meat Science, 79, 124-130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lindemann B., Ogiwara Y., Ninomiya Y. (2002): The discovery of umami. Oxford Journals, Chemical Senses, 27, 843-844. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lindemann B. (2001): Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature, 413, 219-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Salehifar E., Shivazad M., Foroudi F., Chamani M., Kashani R.B. (2012): Reevaluation of digestible amino acid requirements of male and female broilers based on different ideal amino acids rations in starter period. Livestock Science, 147, 154-158. Go to original source...
  19. Saunders A.J., Wessels J.P.H., Gous R.M. (1977): Carcass amino acid composition and utilization of dietary amino acids by chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 7, 111-115.
  20. Stilborn H.L., Moran E.T., Gous R.M., Harrison M.D. (1997): Effect of age on feather amino acid contents from two broiler strain crosses and sexes. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 6, 205-209. Go to original source...
  21. Stilborn H.L., Moran E.T., Gous R.M., Harrison M.D. (2010): Influence of age on carcass (feather-free) amino acid for two broiler strain crosses and sexes. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 19, 13-23. Go to original source...
  22. Strakova E., Suchy P., Navratil P., Karel T., Herzig I. (2015): Comparison of the content of crude protein and amino acids in the whole bodies of cocks and hens of Ross 308 and Cobb 500 hybrids at the end of fattening. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60, 67-74. Go to original source...
  23. Subrt J., Kracmar S., Divis V. (2002): The profile of amino acids in intramuscular protein of bulls of milked and beef commercial types. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 47, 21-29.
  24. Szucs E., Votisky L., Csiba A., Acs I. (1985): Data on the amino acid composition and the biological value of the meat of young bulls. Húsipar, 24, 156-159. (in Hungarian)
  25. Tumova E., Chodova D., Svobodova J., Uhlirova L., Volek Z. (2015): Carcass composition and meat quality of Czech genetic resources of nutrias (Myocastor coypus). Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60, 479-486. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.