Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2017, 62(1):1-8 | DOI: 10.17221/49/2015-CJAS
Substantial hybridisation between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and East Balkan pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in natural environment as a result of semi-wild rearing in BulgariaOriginal Paper
- 1 Molecular Zoology Unit, Chair of Zoology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- 2 Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- 3 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
- 4 Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States of America
The East Balkan pig (EBP) is a traditional domestic pig breed in Bulgaria managed in semi-wild conditions and well-adapted to the continental climate and rearing on pastures. From the genetical and historical point of view it is important to preserve this ancient breed. However, over the last several years, a dramatic decline of EBP herds has been observed. Moreover, introgression between EBP and wild boar in Bulgaria (WBB) is very likely to have occurred. In this study we used a set of 10 microsatellites and the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method on melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) polymorphisms to study the degree of hybridisation between WBB, EBP, and a commercial pig breed (CPB). MC1R results identified WBB-EBP hybrids and the analysis of the microsatellite data with a Bayesian assignment approach and the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components revealed a low genetic differentiation between WBB and EBP and a high amount of introgression of WBB into EBP. A mentionable introgression of CPB into EBP was also revealed. It is apparent that the traditional rearing system of EBP, which is hundreds of years old, has led to a permanent hybridisation between WBB and EBP. In our opinion, the preservation of the semi-wild rearing system is a prerequisite for the conservation of this old, indigenous pig breed and its genetic composition, as the semi-wild rearing system allows the continuous introgression with WBB. Moreover, the introgression of commercial breeds into EBP or WBB should be prevented. Due to the bidirectional gene flow these hybridisation events would have negative consequences (i.e. loss of viability and adaptation) for the wild boars as well as for the indigenous pig breed.
Keywords: microsatellites, PCR-RFLP, melanocortin-1 receptor, introgression, local pig breed, commercial pig breed
Published: January 31, 2017 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
Supplementary files:
Download file | 49-2015 Nikolov_SOM.pdf File size: 461.35 kB |
References
- Canu A., Costa S., Iacolina L., Piatti P., Apollonio M., Scandura M. (2014): Are captive wildboar more introgressed than free-ranging wild boar? Two case studies in Italy. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 60, 459-467.
Go to original source...
- Ciobanu D.C., Day A.E., Nagy A., Wales R., Rothschild M.F., Plastow G.S. (2001): Genetic variation in two conserved local Romanian pig breeds using type 1 DNA markers. Genetics Selection Evolution, 33, 417-432.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dimitrov T.S., Dimitrova I. (1994): Preservation of livestock genetic resources in Bulgaria. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 14, 41-59.
Go to original source...
- Druml T., Salajpal K., Dikic M., Urosevic M., Grilz-Seger G., Baumung R. (2012): Genetic diversity, population structure and subdivision of local Balkan pig breeds in Austria, Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina and its practical value in conservation programs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 44, 5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Earl D.A., von Holdt B.M. (2012): STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4, 359-361.
Go to original source...
- Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2611-2620.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fajardo V., Gonzalez I., Martin I., Rojas M., Hernandez P.E., Garcia T., Martin R. (2008): Differentiation of European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic swine (Sus scrofa domestica) meats by PCR analysis targeting the mitochondrial D-loop and the nuclear melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) genes. Meat Science, 78, 314-322.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fang M., Larson G., Ribeiro H.S., Li N., Andersson L. (2009): Contrasting mode of evolution at a coat color locus in wild and domestic pigs. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000341.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fontanesi L., Ribani A., Scotti E., Utzeri V.J., Velickovic N., Dall'Olio S. (2014): Differentiation of meat from European wild boars and domestic pigs using polymorphisms in the MC1R and NR6A1 genes. Meat Science, 98, 781-784.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Frantz A.C., Massei G., Burke T. (2012): Genetic evidence for past hybridisation between domestic pigs and English wild boars. Conservation Genetics, 13, 1355-1364.
Go to original source...
- Frantz A.C., Zachos F.E., Kirschning J., Cellina S., Bertouille S., Mamuris Z., Koutsogiannouli E.A., Burke T. (2013): Genetic evidence for introgression between domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Belgium and Luxembourg: a comparative approach with multiple marker systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110, 104-115.
Go to original source...
- Genov P., Nikolov H., Massei G., Gerasimov S. (1991): Craniometrical analyses of Bulgarian wild boar. Journal of Zoology, 225, 309-325.
Go to original source...
- Georgiev I., Benkov B. (1964a): Industrial crossing of East Balkan Swine with boars from breeds Manhgalica and Bulgarian White. Journal of Animal Sciences, 2, 3-15.
- Georgiev I., Benkov B. (1964b): Investigation of the effect of industrial crossing of East Balkan Swine with boars from breeds Bercsheer and breeding group Coloured Derman Sow. Journal of Animal Sciences, 3, 15-23.
- Guo S.W., Thompson E.A. (1992): Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrix, 48, 361-372.
Go to original source...
- Hirata D., Doichev V.D., Raichev E.G., Palova N.A., Nakev J.L., Yordanov Y.M., Kaneko Y., Masuda R. (2015): Genetic variation of the East Balkan Swine (Sus scrofa) in Bulgaria, revealed by mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosomal DNA. Animal Genetics, 46, 209-212.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hlebarov G. (1921): The East Balkan Pig. Zemizdat, Sofia, Bulgaria.
- Hubisz M.J., Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K. (2009): Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 1322-1332.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Jombart T., Devillard S., Balloux F. (2010): Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics, 11, 94.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kijas J.M.H., Wales R., Tornsten A., Chardon P., Moller M., Andersson L. (1998): Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat colour in pigs. Genetics, 150, 1177- 1185.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Koutsogiannouli E.A., Moutou K.A., Sarafidou T., Stamatis C., Mamuris Z. (2010): Detection of hybrids between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in Greece, using the PCR-RFLP method on melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) mutations. Mammalian Biology, 75, 69-73.
Go to original source...
- Lowden S., Finlayson H.A., Macdonald A.A., Downing A.C., Goodman S.J., Leus K., Kaspe L., Wahyuni E., Archibald A.L. (2002): Application of Sus scrofa microsatellite markers to wild Suiformes. Conservation Genetics, 3, 347-350.
Go to original source...
- Nakev J., Kulev K. (2013): Status of the controlled population of the East Balkan swine breed. Agrarni Nauki, 5, 27-30.
- Nakev J., Marchev Y., Nedeva R., Ivanova-Peneva S., Palova N., Gineva E., Kulev K. (2011): East Balkan swine breed - current state and perspectives. Agrarni Nauki, 6, 89-93.
- Nikolov I.S., Gum B., Markov G., Kuehn R. (2009): Population genetic structure of wild boar Sus scrofa in Bulgaria as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Acta Theriologica, 54, 193-205.
Go to original source...
- Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Puechmaille S.J. (2016): The program STRUCTURE does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem. Molecular Ecology Resources, 16, 608-627.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Raymond M., Rousset F. (1995): GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
Go to original source...
- Rohrer G.A., Alexander L.J., Keele J.W., Smith T.P., Beattie C.W. (1994): A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome. Genetics, 136, 231-245.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Roy M.S., Geffen E., Smith D., Ostrander E.A., Wayne R.K. (1994): Patterns of differentiation and hybridisation in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 553-570.
Go to PubMed...
- Scandura M., Iacolina L., Crestanello B., Pecchioli E., Di Benedetto M.F., Russo V., Davoli R., Apollonio M., Bertorelle G. (2008): Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Molecular Ecology, 17, 1745-1762.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Scandura M., Iacolina L., Cossu A., Apollonio M. (2011a): Effects of human perturbation on the genetic make-up of an island population: the case of the Sardinian wild boar. Heredity, 106, 1012-1020.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Scandura M., Iacolina L., Apollonio M. (2011b): Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: phylogeography, population structure and wild × domestic hybridisation. Mammal Review, 41, 125-137.
Go to original source...
- Sprem N., Salajpal K., Safner T., Dikic D., Juric J., Curik I., Dikic M., Cubric-Curik V. (2014): Genetic analysis of hybridisation between domesticated endangered pig breeds and wild boar. Livestock Science, 162, 1-4.
Go to original source...
- Van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P.M., Shipley P. (2004): MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538.
Go to original source...
- Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. (1984): Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.