Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 59(8):345-352 | DOI: 10.17221/7585-CJAS

Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contaminationOriginal Paper

M. Englmaierová1, E. Tůmová2, V. Charvátová2, M. Skřivan1
1 Department of Nutrition Physiology and Animal Product Quality, Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
2 Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The objective of this study was to compare the performance, egg quality, and microbial contamination of egg shells from hens maintained in different housing systems, such as conventional and enriched cages, litter, and aviaries. The housing system significantly (P < 0.001) influenced the performance characteristics. The highest egg production, lowest daily feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio were measured in conventional cages compared to litter and aviaries. Higher egg shell and albumen qualities were observed in conventional cages, whereas hens housed in enriched cages and aviaries laid eggs with a higher yolk index (P < 0.001). The housing system significantly (P < 0.001) influenced the total count of bacteria on the egg surface and the microbial contamination of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli. The lowest values for the total count of bacterial contamination (P < 0.001) were found in eggs from conventional cages (4.05 log colony-forming units (CFU)/egg) and enriched cages (3.98 log CFU/egg). Eggs from aviaries had 5.49 log CFU per egg, and the highest level of contamination was observed in eggs that were laid on litter (6.24 log CFU/egg). The level of the microbial contamination of egg shells from litter and aviaries was by 2 log CFU higher than in eggs from cages. It could be concluded, from the viewpoint of egg safety, a more suitable substitute for conventional cages are enriched cages and aviaries than litter.

Keywords: cage; aviary; litter; egg production; egg shell; bacterial contamination

Published: August 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Englmaierová M, Tůmová E, Charvátová V, Skřivan M. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014;59(8):345-352. doi: 10.17221/7585-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ahmed A.M.H., Rodriguez-Navarro A.B., Vidal M.L., Gautron J., Garcia-Ruiz J.M., Nys Y. (2005): Changes in eggshell mechanical properties, crystallographic texture and in matrix proteins induced by moult in hens. British Poultry Science, 46, 268-279. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Anderson K.E., Adams A.W. (1994): Effects of cage versus floor environments and cage floor mesh size on bone strength, fearfulness and production of single comb White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science, 73, 1233-1240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Appleby M.C., Walker A.W., Nicol C.J., Lindberg A.C., Freire R., Hughes B.O., Elson H.A. (2002): Development of furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 43, 489-500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Board R.G., Tranter H.S. (1995): The microbiology of eggs. In: Stadelman W.J., Cotterill O.J. (eds): Egg Science and Technology. The Haworth Press, Inc., New York, USA, 81-104.
    5. De Reu K., Grijspeerdt K., Heyndrickx M., Zoons J., De Baere K., Uyttendaele M., Debevere J., Herman L. (2005): Bacterial egg shell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and aviary housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 46, 149-155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. De Reu K., Grijspeerdt K., Heyndrickx M., Uyttendaele M., Debevere J., Herman L. (2006): Bacterial shell contamination in the egg collection chains of different housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 47, 163-172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. De Reu K., Messens W., Heyndrickx M., Rodenburg T.B., Uyttendaele M., Herman L. (2008): Bacterial contamination of table eggs and the influence of housing systems. World's Poultry Science Journal, 64, 5-19. Go to original source...
    8. Haugh R.R. (1937): The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg and Poultry Magazine, 43, 552-555, 572-573.
    9. Hidalgo A., Rossi M., Clerici F., Ratti S. (2008): A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Food Chemistry, 106, 1031-1038. Go to original source...
    10. Hulzebosch J. (2006): Wide range of housing options for layers. World's Poultry, 22, 20-22.
    11. Huneau-Salaun A., Michel V., Huonnic D., Balaine L., Le Bouquin S. (2010): Factors influencing bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and free-range systems for laying hens under commercial conditions. British Poultry Science, 51, 163-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Huneau-Salaun A., Guinebretiere M., Taktak A., Huonnic D., Michel V. (2011): Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality. Animal, 5, 911-917. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Leyendecker M., Hamann H., Hartung J., Kamphues J., Ring C., Glunder G., Ahlers C., Sander I., Neumann U., Distl O. (2001a): Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance trails, egg quality and bone strength. 1st Communication: Performance traits. Zuchtungskunde, 73, 290-307.
    14. Leyendecker M., Hamann H., Hartung J., Kamphues J., Ring C., Glunder G., Ahlers C., Sander I., Neumann U., Distl O. (2001b): Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance trails, egg quality and bone strength. 2nd Communication: Egg quality traits. Zuchtungskunde, 73, 308-323.
    15. Lichovnikova M., Zeman L. (2008): Effect of housing system on the calcium requirement of laying hens and on eggshell quality. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 162-168. Go to original source...
    16. Mallet S., Guesdon V., Ahmed A.M.H., Nys Y. (2006): Comparison of eggshell hygiene in two housing systems: standard and furnished cages. British Poultry Science, 47, 30-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Mallet S., Huneau-Salaun A., Herman L., De Reu K. (2010): Laying hen breeding systems and hygienic status of the eggs. Productions Animales, 23, 183-191. Go to original source...
    18. Michel V., Huonnic D. (2003): A comparison of welfare, health and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries. British Poultry Science, 44, 775-776. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Pistekova V., Hovorka M., Vecerek V., Strakova E., Suchy P. (2006): The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51, 318-325. Go to original source...
    20. Platz S., Heyn E., Hergt F., Weigl B., Erhard M. (2009): Comparative study on the behaviour, health and productivity of laying hens in a furnished cage and an aviary system. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 122, 235-240. Go to PubMed...
    21. Quarles C.L., Gentry R.F., Bressler G.O. (1970): Bacterial contamination in poultry houses and its relationship to egg hatchability. Poultry Science, 49, 60-66. Go to original source...
    22. Saleh M., Seedorf J., Hartung J. (2003): Total count of bacteria in the air of three different laying hen housing systems. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 110, 394-397. Go to PubMed...
    23. Singh R., Cheng K.M., Silversides F.G. (2009): Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Science, 88, 256-264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Skrivan M., Marounek M., Englmaierova M., Skrivanova V. (2013): Influence of dietary vitamin C and selenium, alone and in combination, on the performance of laying hens and quality of eggs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 58, 91-97. Go to original source...
    25. Tactacan G.B., Guenter W., Lewis N.J., Rodriguez-Lecompte J.C., House J.D. (2009): Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science, 88, 698-707. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Tanaka T., Hurnik J.F. (1992): Comparison of behavior and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poultry Science, 71, 235-243. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Tauson R. (2005): Management and housing systems for layers - effects on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61, 477-490. Go to original source...
    28. Tauson R., Wahlstrom A., Abrahamsson P. (1999): Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 8, 152-159. Go to original source...
    29. Tumova E., Ebeid T. (2003): Effect of housing system on performance and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 34, 73-80.
    30. Tumova E., Ebeid T. (2005): Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50, 129-134. Go to original source...
    31. Tumova E., Gous R.M. (2012): Interaction between oviposition time, age, and environmental temperature and egg quality traits in laying hens and broiler breeders. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 541-549. Go to original source...
    32. Tumova E., Skrivan M., Englmaierova M., Zita L. (2009): The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 17-23. Go to original source...
    33. Tumova E., Englmaierova M., Ledvinka Z., Charvatova V. (2011): Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 56, 490-498. Go to original source...
    34. Valkonen E., Venalainen E., Rossow L., Valaja J. (2010): Effects of calcium diet supplements on egg strength in conventional and furnished cages, and effects of 2 different nest floor materials. Poultry Science, 89, 2307-2316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Voslarova E., Hanzalek Z., Vecerek V., Strakova E., Suchy P. (2006): Comparison between laying hen performance in the cage system and the deep litter system on a diet free from animal protein. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 75, 219-225. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content