Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2013, 58(9):429-436 | DOI: 10.17221/6943-CJAS

Simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and litter size traits in Czech Large White and Czech Landrace pigsOriginal Paper

E. Krupa, J. Wolf
Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhøínìves, Czech Republic

Genetic parameters for total number of piglets born per litter, number of piglets weaned per litter, lean meat content, and average daily gain from birth till the end of the field test were estimated for Czech Large White (445 589 records) and Czech Landrace (149 057 records) pigs using a four-trait animal model. The following heritabilities were estimated (first number: Large White, second number: Landrace): 0.10 ± 0.004 and 0.09 ± 0.007 for total number born; 0.09 ± 0.005 and 0.07 ± 0.008 for number weaned; 0.39 ± 0.004 and 0.36 ± 0.009 for lean meat content; 0.21 ± 0.004 and 0.18 ± 0.006 for daily gain. The highest genetic correlation (approximately 0.85 in both breeds) was estimated between both litter size traits. In Czech Landrace, all remaining genetic correlations were < 0.20 in their absolute value. Negative correlations of approximately ‑0.25 were estimated in Czech Large White between daily gain and both reproduction traits. All remaining correlations in Czech Large White were also < 0.20 in their absolute value. The estimated non-zero correlations between production and reproduction traits are, besides of other arguments, one reason to recommend a joint genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits. If more than one litter trait is included in the genetic evaluation, repeatability models should be used instead of separate treating the first and the second and subsequent litters; this is because of the high correlations among litter size traits which are expected to cause numerical problems if multi-parity models are used.

Keywords: total number of piglets born; number of piglets weaned; lean meat content; average daily gain; heritability; genetic correlation; REML

Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krupa E, Wolf J. Simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and litter size traits in Czech Large White and Czech Landrace pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2013;58(9):429-436. doi: 10.17221/6943-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Arango J., Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Culbertson M., Herring W. (2005): Threshold-linear estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing mortality, litter size, and test performance of Large White sows. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 499-506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Chen P., Baas T.J., Mabry J.W., Koehler K.J. (2003): Genetic correlations between lean growth and litter traits in US Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1700-1705. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. De Maturana E.L., de los Campos G., Wu X.L., Gianola D., Weigel K.A., Rosa G.J.M. (2010): Modeling relationships between calving traits: a comparison between standard and recursive mixed models. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, Article 1. Go to original source...
  4. Estany J., Villalba D., Tibau J., Soler J., Babot D., Noguera J.L. (2002a): Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: I. Growth, fat deposition, and feeding behavior traits. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2556-2565. Go to original source...
  5. Estany J., Villalba D., Tor M., Cubilo D., Noguera J.L. (2002b): Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: II. Carcass, meat, and fat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2566-2573. Go to original source...
  6. Fischer R., Spilke J., von Lengerken G. (1999): Einbeziehung von Fruchtbarkeitsleistungen in die Zuchtwertschätzung beim Schwein. 1. Mitteilung: Berücksichtigung aufeinanderfolgender Wurfleistungen einer Sau. Züchtungskunde, 71, 196-208.
  7. Groeneveld E., Kovaè M., Mielenz N. (2008): VCE User's Guide and Reference Manual, Version 6.0. Available from ftp://ftp.tzv.fal.de/pub/latest_vce/doc/ (accessed Aug 1, 2011).
  8. Hanenberg E.H.A.T., Knol E.F., Merks J.W.M. (2001): Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science, 69, 179-186. Go to original source...
  9. Hermesch S., Luxford B.G., Graser H.U. (2000): Genetic parameters for lean meat yield, meat quality, reproduction and feed efficiency traits for Australian pigs. 3. Genetic parameters for reproduction traits and genetic correlations with production, carcase and meat quality traits. Livestock Production Science, 65, 261-270. Go to original source...
  10. Holm B., Bakken M., Klemetsdal G., Vangen O. (2004): Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3458-3464. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Holm B., Bakken M., Vangen O., Rekaya R. (2005): Genetic analysis of age at first service, return rate, litter size, and weaning-to-first service interval of gilts and sows. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 41-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Huby M., Gogué J., Maignel L., Bidanel J.P. (2003): Corrélations génétiques entre les caractéristiques numériques et pondérales de la portée, la variabilité du poids des porcelets et leur survie entre la naissance et le sevrage. Journées Recherche Porcine, 35, 293-300.
  13. Hyánková L., Novotná B. (2007): Divergent selection for shape of growth curve in Japanese quail. 3. Onset of sexual maturity and basic characteristics of early lay. British Poultry Science, 48, 551-558. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ibáñez-Escriche N., de Maturana E.L., Noguera J.L., Varona L. (2010): An application of change-point recursive models to the relationship between litter size and number of stillborns in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 3493-3503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kapell D.N.R.G., Ashworth C.J., Walling G.A., Lawrence A.B., Edwards S.A., Roehe R. (2009): Estimation of genetic associations between reproduction and production traits based on a sire and dam line with common ancestry. Animal, 3, 1354-1362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Neumaier A., Groeneveld E. (1998): Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics Selection Evolution, 30, 3-26. Go to original source...
  17. Noguera J.L., Varona L., Babot D., Estany J. (2002): Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: I. Bayesian variance component estimation. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2540-2547. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pe¹kovièová D., Wolf J., Groeneveld E., Wolfová M. (2002): Simultaneous estimation of the covariance structure of traits from field test, station test and litter recording in pigs. Livestock Production Science, 77, 155-165. Go to original source...
  19. Serenius T., Sevón-Aimonen M.L., Mäntysaari E.A. (2003): Effect of service sire and validity of repeatability model in litter size and farrowing interval of Finnish Landrace and Large White populations. Livestock Production Science, 81, 213-222. Go to original source...
  20. Serenius T., Sevón-Aimonen M.L., Kause A., Mäntysaari E.A., Mäki-Tanila A. (2004): Selection potential of different prolificacy traits in the Finnish Landrace and Large White populations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, 54, 36-43. Go to original source...
  21. Su G., Lund M.S., Sorensen D. (2007): Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 1385-1392. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Wolf J. (2012): Technical note: A general transformation formula for interval traits connected with reproduction in pig. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 3695-3697. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Wolf J., Pe¹kovièová D., Groeneveld E., Wolfová M. (2002): Genetische Parameter für Fruchtbarkeitsmerkmale beim Schwein - eine detaillierte Analyse der ersten vier Würfe unter Verwendung verschiedener Modelle mit zufälligem HYS-Effekt. 2. Mitteilung: Korrelationen zwischen den Merkmalen und den Würfen. Züchtungskunde, 74, 46-55.
  24. Wolf J., ®áková E., Groeneveld E. (2005): Genetic parameters for a joint genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50, 96-103. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.