Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2012, 57(10):454-468 | DOI: 10.17221/6346-CJAS

Nutritive value of red clover and lucerne forages for ruminants estimated by in vitro and in vivo digestibility methods

P. Homolka1,2, V. Koukolová1, M. Podsedníček1, A. Hlaváčková2
1 Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The aim of this study was to determine the nutrient and energy levels of red clover and lucerne forage. Investigation of forage at different maturity stages of three growths was carried out by chemical analysis, in vitro and in vivo digestibility methods. Generally, maturation caused a significant increase in fibre fractions. With the increasing maturity of forage samples the in vivo, in vitro, and calculated in vivo (in vivocalcul) digestibilities of organic matter (OM) linearly decreased. The in vitro and in vivocalcul digestibilities of OM averaged 0.754 and 0.708 for red clover and 0.717 and 0.667 for lucerne, respectively. The in vivo OM digestibility averaged 0.710 for red clover and 0.666 for lucerne. Gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEL), and net energy for growth (NEG) averaged 18.12, 12.41, 9.60, 5.67, 5.50 and 18.09, 11.56, 9.01, 5.26, 4.99 MJ/kg of dry matter for red clover and lucerne, respectively. The effect of a vegetative stage on energy values of both forages was diverged for various growth times. When data were pooled across the estimated season, seven cutting-specific equations for descriptions of GE, DE, ME, NEL, NEG, in vitro, and in vivo OM digestibilities were obtained for red clover and lucerne, separately. The red clover model expression gave similar prediction equations for lucerne. It was possible to predict cutting-specific equations with coefficients of determination R2 > 0.719 for red clover and R2 > 0.400 for lucerne of the variation in GE, DE, ME, NEL, and NEG. The in vitro and in vivo OM digestibility equations were predicted with R2 being 0.840 (in vitro) and 0.707 (in vivo) for red clover, and 0.979 (in vitro) and 0.937 (in vivo) for lucerne. The parameters of these specific equations were statistically preferable than the general model expression which included both forages together.

Keywords: ruminant; forage quality; organic matter digestibility; energy value

Published: October 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Homolka P, Koukolová V, Podsedníček M, Hlaváčková A. Nutritive value of red clover and lucerne forages for ruminants estimated by in vitro and in vivo digestibility methods. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2012;57(10):454-468. doi: 10.17221/6346-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AOAC (2005): Official Methods of Analysis. 18 th Ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, USA.
    2. Arieli A., Shahar K., Mabjeesh S.J., Zamwel S., Sklan D. (1999): Estimation of the digestible energy of ruminant feedstuffs by the combined bag technique. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 566‒573. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Bal M.A., Coors J.G., Shaver R.D. (1997): Impact of the maturity of corn for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 2497‒2503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Bargo F., Muller L.D., Kelver E.S., Delahoy J.E. (2003): Invited review: Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 1‒42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Baumann T.A., Lardy G.P., Caton J.S., Anderson V.L. (2004): Effect of energy source and ruminally degradable protein addition on performance of lactating beef cows and digestion characteristics of steers. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 2667‒2678. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Belyea R., Restrepo R., Martz F., Ellersieck M. (1999): Effect of year and cutting on equations for estimating net energy of alfalfa forage. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 1943‒1949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Bosch M.W., Tamminga S., Post G., Leffering C.P., Muylaert J.M. (1992): Influence of stage of maturity of grass silages on digestion processes in dairy cows. 1. Composition, nylon bag degradation rates, fermentation characteristics, digestibility and intake. Livestock Production Science, 32, 245‒264. Go to original source...
    8. Buxton D.R. (1996): Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 59, 37‒49. Go to original source...
    9. Coblentz W.K., Fritz J.O., Fick W.H., Cochran R.C., Shirley J.E. (1998): In situ dry matter, nitrogen, and fiber degradation of alfalfa, red clover, and eastern gamagrass at four maturities. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 150‒161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Dowman M.G., Collins F.C. (1982): The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 33, 689‒696. Go to original source...
    11. Drackley J.K., Donkin S.S., Reynolds C.K. (2006): Major advances in fundamental dairy cattle nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1324‒1336. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Dubbs T.M., Vanzant E.S., Kitts S.E., Bapst F.F., Fieser B.G., Howlett C.M. (2003): Characterization of season and sampling method effects on measurement of forage quality in fescue-based pastures. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1308‒1315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Elizalde J.C., Merchen N.R., Faulkner D.B. (1999): In situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of fresh forages during the spring growth. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 1978‒1990. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Fick G.W., Mueller S.C. (1989): Alfalfa quality, maturity, and mean stage of development. Cornell Cooperative Extension, Information Bulletin, 217, 12.
    15. Gallardo M.R., Castillo A.R., Bargo F., Abdala A.A., Maciel M.G., Perez-Monti H., Castro H.C., Castelli M.E. (2005): Monensin for lactating dairy cows grazing mixed alfalfa pasture and supplemented with partial mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 644‒652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Gosselink J.M.J., Dulphy J.P., Poncet C., Jailler M., Tamminga S., Cone J.W. (2004): Prediction of forage digestibility in ruminants using in situ and in vitro techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 115, 227‒246. Go to original source...
    17. Harazim J., Pavelek L., Čerešňáková Z., Homolka P., Třináctý J., Jambor V., Pozdíšek J., Zeman L. (1999): Determination of degradability of feed crude protein and amino acids in the rumen using the method in situ, nylon bag. In: Proc. International Scientific Workshop Determination of the Use of Nutrients in Ruminants. Opava, Czech Republic, 115‒118.
    18. Hindrichsen I.K., Kreuzer M., Madsen J., Bach Knudsen K.E. (2006): Fiber and lignin analysis in concentrate, forage, and feaces: detergent versus enzymatic-chemical method. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 2168‒2176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Hoffman P.C., Sievert S.J., Shaver R.D., Welch D.A., Combs D.K. (1993): In situ dry matter, protein, and fiber degradation of perennial forages. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 2632‒2643. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Homolka P. (1994): Prediction of bulk fodder organic matter digestibility by the enzyme cellulose. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 39, 599‒604.
    21. Hunt C.W., Kezar W., Vinande R. (1989): Yield, chemical composition and ruminal fermentability of corn whole plant, ear, and stover as affected by maturity. Journal of Production Agriculture, 2, 357‒361. Go to original source...
    22. Jančík F., Koukolová V., Homolka P. (2010): Ruminal degradability of dry matter and neutral detergent fibre of grasses. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55, 359‒371. Go to original source...
    23. Jančík F., Koukolová V., Kubelková P., Čermák B. (2009): Effects of grass species on ruminal degradability of silages and prediction of dry matter effective degradability. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 315‒323. Go to original source...
    24. Johnson D.E., Ferrell C.L., Jenkins T.G. (2003): The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Animal Science, 81 (Suppl. 1), E27‒E38.
    25. Koukolová V., Homolka P., Koukol O., Jančík F. (2010): Nutritive value of Trifolium pratense L. for ruminants estimated from in situ ruminal degradation of neutral detergent fibre and in vivo digestibility of organic matter and energy. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55, 372‒381. Go to original source...
    26. Mountousis I., Dotas V., Stanogias G., Papanikolaou K., Roukos C., Liamadis D. (2011): Altitudinal and seasonal variation in herbage composition and energy and protein content of grasslands on Mt Varnoudas, NW Greece. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 164, 174‒183. Go to original source...
    27. Ohlsson C., Wedin W.F. (1989): Phenological staging schemes for predicting red clover quality. Crop Science, 29, 416‒420. Go to original source...
    28. Písaříková B., Peterka J., Trčková M., Moudrý J., Zralý Z., Herzig I. (2007): The content of insoluble fibre and crude protein value of the aboveground biomass of Amaranthus cruentus and A. hypochndriacus. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52, 348‒353. Go to original source...
    29. Pozdíšek J., Vaculová K. (2008): Study of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality for feeding ruminants using in vitro and in vivo methods. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 253‒264. Go to original source...
    30. Ribeiro C.V.D.M., Karnati S.K.R., Eastridge M.L. (2005): Biohydrogenation of fatty acids and digestibility of fresh alfalfa or alfalfa hay plus sucrose in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 4007‒4017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Rinne M., Nykänen A. (2000): Timing of primary growth harvest affects the yield and nutritive value of timothyred clover mixtures. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, 9, 121‒134. Go to original source...
    32. Rinne M., Olt A., Nousiainen J., Seppälä A., Tuori M., Fraser M.D., Huhtanen P. (2006): Prediction of legume silage digestibility from various laboratory methods. Grass and Forage Science, 61, 354‒362. Go to original source...
    33. Scarbrough D.A., Coblentz W.K., Coffey K.P., Turner J.E., Davis G.V., Kellogg D.W., Hellwig D.H. (2001): Effects of calendar date and summer management on the in situ dry matter and fiber degradation of stockpiled forage from bermudagrass pastures. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 3158‒3169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Skinner H.R., Moore K.J. (2007): Growth and development of forage plant. In: Barnes R.F., Nelson C.J., Moore K.J., Collins M. (eds): Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture. 6th Ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, USA, 53‒66.
    35. Sommer A., Čerešňáková Z., Frydrych Z., Králík O., Králíková Z., Krása A., Pajtáš M., Petrikovič P., Pozdíšek J., Šimek M., Třináctý J., Vencl B., Zeman L. (1994): Tables of nutrient requirements and nutritive value of feeds for ruminants. Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)
    36. Terry R.A., Tilley J.M.A. (1964): The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perrenial ryegrass, cockfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and saifoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 19, 363‒372. Go to original source...
    37. Tyrolová Y., Výborná A. (2008): Effect of the stage of maturity on the leaf percentage of lucerne and the effect of additives on silage characteristics. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 330‒335. Go to original source...
    38. Van Soest P.J. (1996): Environment and forage quality. In: Proc. 58th Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers. Cornell University, Ithaca, USA, 1.
    39. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583‒3597. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. VandeHaar M.J., St-Pierre N. (2006): Major advances in nutrition: Relevance to the sustainability of the dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1280‒1291. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. Vencl B. (1985): Metodology of in vivo digestibility determination and groups trials using ruminants. Research Institute of Animal Production Uhříněves, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)
    42. Waldo D.R. (1986): Effect of forage quality on intake and forage-concentrate interactions. Journal of Dairy Science, 69, 617‒631. Go to original source...
    43. Weiss W.P. (1994): Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods. In: Fahey Jr. G.C. (ed.): Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA, 644‒681. Go to original source...
    44. Wilson J.R., Deinum B., Engels F.M. (1991): Temperature effects on anatomy and digestibility of leaf and stem of tropical and temperate forage species. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 39, 31‒48. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content