Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 53(12):528-536 | DOI: 10.17221/369-CJAS

The first observation of milkability of the sheep breeds Tsigai, Improved Valachian and their crosses with Lacaune

L. Mačuhová1, M. Uhrinčať1, J. Mačuhová2, M. Margetín1, V. Tančin1
1 Slovak Centre of Agricultural Research, RIAP Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic
2 Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry, Poing, Germany

The aim of this study was to evaluate the milkability of two purebred breeds Tsigai (TS, n = 14) and Improved Valachian (IV, n = 15), their crosses with Lacaune 50% TS × 50% LC (n = 13), 50% IV × 50% LC (n = 9) and purebred Lacaune (LC, n = 19). The measurements of the milk flow were performed on day 90 ± 10 of lactation during evening machine milking. The recording of milk flow was carried out by the equipment for graduated electronic recording of milk level in a jar in one-second intervals. The milk flow curves were classified into four types: 1 peak (1P), 2 peaks (2P), plateau I (maximal milk flow over 0.4 l/min (PLI)), plateau II (maximal milk flow less than 0.4 l/min (PLII)). The last two types refer to ewes with steady milk flow during milking. Udder morphology traits were measured (cisternal depth, teat angle) and subjectively assessed by the use of linear scores (cistern depth, teat position). The average total milk yield was 0.335 ± 0.043, 0.392 ± 0.042, 0.407 ± 0.042 l in purebred TS, IV, LC resp. and 0.397 ± 0.046, 0.434 ± 0.056 l in crosses TS × LC and IV × LC, resp. The frequency of occurrence of different types of milk flow /1P:2P:PLI:PLII/ was 27, 47, 22, 4%, resp. The highest milk yield was observed in ewes with PLI (0.481 ± 0.045 l), followed by 2P (0.401 ± 0.029 l) and 1P (0.293 ± 0.036 l) type of milk flow curve (P = 0.0112). An opposite effect was observed in the percentage of machine stripping yield where 1P had 41.94 ± 3.83%, 2P 21.29 ± 3.04% and PLI 15.90 ± 4.70% (P < 0.0001). LC and TS × LC, IV × LC had the more horizontal teat position than TS and IV. It can be supposed that at least during around 69% milkings the sheep released oxytocin in response to machine milking and that TS, IV and their crosses with LC also have a suitable potential for machine milking.

Keywords: dairy sheep; milk flow curves; udder morphology; machine milking

Published: December 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mačuhová L, Uhrinčať M, Mačuhová J, Margetín M, Tančin V. The first observation of milkability of the sheep breeds Tsigai, Improved Valachian and their crosses with Lacaune. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008;53(12):528-536. doi: 10.17221/369-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bruckmaier R.M., Paul G., Mayer H., Schams D. (1997): Machine milking of Ostfriesian and Lacaune dairy sheep: udder anatomy, milk ejection, and milking characteristics. Journal of Dairy Research, 64, 163-172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Carta A., Sanna S.R., Ruda G., Casu S. (1999): Relationships between characteristics of the teat and milkability in Lacaune ewes. In: Barillet F., Zervas N.P. (eds.): Milking and Milk Production of Dairy Sheep and Goat. Wageningen pers., EAAP Publication, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 95, 363-368.
    3. Dzidic A., Kaps M., Bruckmaier R.M. (2004): Machine milking of Istrian dairy crossbreed ewes: udder morphology and milking characteristics. Small Ruminant Research, 55, 183-189. Go to original source...
    4. Labussiere J. (1988): Review of physiological and anatomical factors influencing the milking ability of ewes and the organization of milking. Livestock Production Science, 18, 253-274. Go to original source...
    5. Mačuhová L., Uhrinčať M., Marnet P.G., Margetín M., Mihina Š., Mačuhová J., Tančin V. (2007): Response of ewes to machine milking: evaluation of the milk flow curves. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 40, 89-96. (in Slovak)
    6. Marnet P.G., McKusick B.C. (2001): Regulation of milk ejection and milkability in small ruminants. Livestock Production Science, 70, 125-133. Go to original source...
    7. Marnet P.G., Negrao J.A., Labussičre J. (1998): Oxytocin release and milk ejection parameters during milking of dairy ewes in and out of natural season of lactation. Small Ruminant Research, 28, 183-191. Go to original source...
    8. Marnet P.G., Combaud J.F., Dano Y. (1999): Relationships between characteristics of the teat and milkability in Lacaune ewes. In: Barillet F., Zervas N.P. (eds.): Milking and Milk Production of Dairy Sheep and Goat. Wageningen pers., EAAP Publication, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 95, 41-44.
    9. Mayer H., Weber F., Segessemann V. (1989): A method to record and define milk flow curves of ewes during routine machine milking. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, September 13-19. Tel Aviv, Israel, 564-573.
    10. McKusick B.C. (2000): Physiologic factors that modify the efficiency of machine milking in dairy ewes. In: Proceedings of the 6th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium, November 2.-4., Guelph, Canada, 86-100.
    11. McKusick B.C., Marnet P.G., Berger Y.M., Thomas D.L. (2000). Preliminary observations on milk flow and udder morphology traits of East Friesian crossbred dairy ewes. In: Proceedings 6th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium, November 2.-4., Guelph, Canada, 101-116.
    12. Milerski M., Margetín M., Čapistrák A., Apolen D., Špánik J., Oravcová M. (2006): Relationships between external and internal udder measurements and the linear scores for udder morphology traits in dairy sheep. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51, 383-390. Go to original source...
    13. Oravcová M., Peškovičová D. (2008): Genetic and environmental trends for milk production traits in sheep estimated with test-day model. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 21, 1088-1096. Go to original source...
    14. Oravcová M., Groeneveld E., Kovač M., Peškovičová D. (2002): Effect of environmental factors on daily milk yield in purebred ewes of the Improved Valachian and Tsigai breeds. Journal of Farm Animal Science, 35, 107-112. (in Slovak)
    15. Pfeilsticker H.U., Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (1996): Cisternal milk in the dairy cow during lactation and after preceding teat stimulation. Journal of Dairy Research, 63, 509-515. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Rovai M., Such X., Piedrafita J., Caja G., Pujol M.R. (1999): Evolution of mammary morphology traits during lactation and its relationship with milk yield of Manchega and Lacaune dairy sheep. In: Barillet F., Zervas N.P. (eds.): Milking and Milk Production of Dairy Sheep and Goat. Wageningen pers., EAAP Publication, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 95, 107-109.
    17. Rovai M., Such X., Caja G., Piedrafita J. (2002): Milk emission during machine milking in dairy sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 5.
    18. Tančin V., Uhrinčať M., Mačuhová L., Bruckmaier R.M. (2007): Effect of pre-stimulation on mil flow pattern and distribution of milk constituents at a quarter level. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52, 117-121. Go to original source...
    19. Wilde C.J., Peaker M. (1990): Autocrine control in milk secretion. Journal of Agricultural Science, 57, 441-447. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content