Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 53(12):506-514 | DOI: 10.17221/366-CJAS

Effect of weight and sex on intramuscular fat amounts in relation to the formation of selected carcass cuts in pigs

R. Stupka, J. Čítek, M. Šprysl, M. Okrouhlá, D. Kureš, K. Líkař
Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The objective of this study was to examine the influence of weight and sex on fat amounts in relation to the formation of selected carcass cuts in final hybrid pigs commonly kept in the Czech Republic. During the experiment 123 hybrid pigs of various genotypes were tested. The pigs were slaughtered at an average weight of 120.4 kg and dissected in detail. The tested pigs were divided into 5 weight categories, while the tissue composition of ham, joint, shoulder and neck was monitored with emphasis on the assessment of IMF content. A decrease in the lean meat proportion was shown, as well as an increasing fat proportion with increasing weight: for the joint the difference was 4.19%, for the ham 3.9%, shoulder 3.0%, and neck 2.31%. With increasing weight, a moderate increase in intramuscular fat occurred, whereas the differences between group 1 and 5 were: 1.68% for the ham, 0.58% (shoulder), 0.4% (joint) and 0.37% (neck). Concerning the influence of sex, barrows had statistically insignificant intramuscular fat content compared with gilts (excluding the neck). As for the protein content in the monitored carcass cuts, no influence of live weight and sex was recorded.

Keywords: pig; meat; intramuscular fat; live weight; sex

Published: December 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stupka R, Čítek J, Šprysl M, Okrouhlá M, Kureš D, Líkař K. Effect of weight and sex on intramuscular fat amounts in relation to the formation of selected carcass cuts in pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008;53(12):506-514. doi: 10.17221/366-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bahelka I., Hanusová E., Peškovičová D., Demo P. (2007): The effect of sex and slaughter weight on intramuscular fat content and its relationship to carcass traits of pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52, 122-129. Go to original source...
  2. Bejerholm C., Barton-Gade P. (1986): Effect of intramuscular fat level on eating quality of pig meat. In: 32nd European Meeting. Meat Research Workers, Ghent, Belgium, 389-391.
  3. Brewer M.S., Zhu L.G., McKeith F.K. (1999): Consumerrated quality characteristics as related to purchase intent of fresh pork. Journal of Food Science, 64, 171-174. Go to original source...
  4. Brewer M.S., Zhu L.G., McKeith F.K. (2001): Marbling effects on consumer quality characteristics of pork. Purchase Intent. Visual and sensory acceptability. Meat Science, 59, 153-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Brewer M.S., Jensen J., Sosnicki A.A., Fields B., Wilson E., McKeith F.K. (2002): The effect of pig genetics on palatability, colour and physical characteristics of fresh pork loin chops. Meat Science, 61, 249-256. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bruwe G.G., Heinze P.H., Zondach I.B., Naude R.T. (1991): The development of a new classification system for pig carcasses in the RSA. Porcus, 6, 27-31.
  7. Cameron N.D., Warris P.D., Porter S.J., Enser M.B. (1990): Comparision of Duroc and British landrace pigs for meat and eating quality. Danish Meat Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark, 720E. Go to original source...
  8. Cassady J.P., Robinson O.W., Johnson R.K., Mabry J.W., Christian L.L., Tokach M.D., Miller R.K., Goodwinn R.N. (2004): National pork producers council maternal line genetic evaluation: A comparison of growth and carcass traits in terminal progeny. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3482-3485. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Correa J.A., Faucitano L., Laforest J.P., Rivest J., Marcoux M., Gariépy C. (2006): Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Meat Science, 72, 91-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. ČSN ISO 937 (2002): Basic chemical survey of foodstuffs. Determination of crude proteins, Czech Technical Norm. Czech Normalization Institute, Prague, CR. (in Czech)
  11. DeVole D.L., McKeith F.K., Bechtel P.J., Novakovski J., Shanks R.D., Carr T.R. (1988): Variation in composition and palatability traits and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. Journal of Animal Science, 66, 441-447. Go to original source...
  12. Eikelenboom G., Noviny-Bolink A.H., Van der Wal P.G. (1996): The eating quality of pork. 2. The influence of intramuscular fat. Fleischwirtschaft, 517-518.
  13. Faucitano L., Rivest J., Daigle J.P., Lévesque J., Gariepy C. (2004): Distribution of intramuscular fat content and marbling within the longissimus muscle of pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 84, 57-61. Go to original source...
  14. Fernandez X., Monin G., Talmant A., Mourot J., Lebret B. (1999): Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Science, 53, 59-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Fischer K. (2001): Fleischfehler müssen nicht sein. Fleischwirtschaft, 11, 16-21.
  16. Gonzalez J., Soler J., Gispert M., Puigvert X., Tibau J. (2001): Chemical composition of pig carcasses. Effects of body weight, sex and genotype. ITEA, 661-663.
  17. Göransson A., Seth G., Tornberg E. (1992): The influence of intramuscular fat content on the eating quality of pork. In: 38th International Congress of Meat Science Technology, Clermon Ferrand, France, 245-248.
  18. Hamilton D.N., Ellis M., Miller K.D., McKeith F.K., Parrett D.F. (2000): The effect of the halothane and rendement napole genes on carcass and meat quality characteristics of pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 7, 2862-2867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Landgraf S., Roehe R., Susenbeth A., Baulain U., Knap P.W., Looft H. (2002): Biological growth model as a new selection strategy for improvement of feed efficiency in swine. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 18, 84-89.
  20. Latorre M.A., Lázaro R., Gracia M.I., Nieto M., Mateos G.G. (2003): Effect of sex terminal sire genotype on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 117 kg body weight. Meat Science, 65, 1369-1377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Latorre M.A., Lázaro R., Valencia D.G., Medel P., Mateos G.G. (2004): The effect of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 526-533. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Matoušek V., Kernerová N., Václavovský J., Vejčík A. (1997): Analysis of meat quality in hybrid pigs population. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 42, 511-515.
  23. Okrouhlá M., Stupka R., Čítek J., Šprysl M., Kluzáková E., Trnka M., Štolc L. (2006): Amino acid composition of pig meat in relation to live weight and sex. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51, 529-534. Go to original source...
  24. Pipek P., Pour M. (1998): Evaluation of animal products quality. Czech Agricultural University Prague, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, CR, 140 pp. (in Czech)
  25. Pulkrábek J., Pavlík J., Smital J. (1999): Progressive tendency of lean-meat percentage in carcasses of pigs in the Czech Republic. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 30, 231-237.
  26. Pulkrábek J., Wolf J., Vališ L., Vítek M., Höreth R.(2004): Vergleich verschiedener Methoden zur Bestimmung des Muskelfleischanteils im Schlachtkörper des Schweins. Züchtungskunde, 76, 6-17.
  27. Pulkrábek J., Pavlík J., Vališ L., Vítek M. (2006): Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51, 18-23. Go to original source...
  28. SAS (2001): Release 8.2 (TS2MO) of the SAS  System for Microsoft  Windows . SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  29. Smolák M., Ivánek J. (1992): The principles of foreign hybrid programmes in pigs under conditions in the Czech Republic. Prague, CR, 4 pp. (in Czech)
  30. Stoier S., Olsen E.V., Magnussen C.C. (1998): Influence of cross-breeding combination and intramuscular fat content on eating quality of pork. In: Proceedings 44th International Congres of Meat Science and Technology, Sweden, 906-907.
  31. Tibau J., Gonzalez J., Soler J., Gisper M., Lizardo R., Mourot J. (2002): Influence of pig slaughter weight (range 25 to 140 kg) on the chemical composition of the carcass: effect of genotype and sex. 34 Journal de la Recherche Porcine, Paris, France, 121-127.
  32. Tischendorf F., Schane F., Kirchheim U., Jahreis G. (2002): Influence of conjugated linoleic acid mixture on growth, organ, weights, carcass traits and meat quality in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology, 86, 117-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Verbeke W., Oeckel van M.J., Warnants N., Visené J., Boucqué Ch.V. (1999): Consumer perception, facts and possibilities to improve acceptability of health and sensory characteristics of pork. Meat Science, 53, 77-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Walstra P., Merkus G.S.M. (1996): Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Zeist, Netherlands, 1-22.
  35. Willam A., Moser A., Haiger A. (1990): Grobgewebliche Zusammensetzung von Schweinehälften und Teilstücken. Forderungsdienst, 10, 302-305.
  36. Wood J.D. (1990): Consequences for meat quality of reducing carcass fatness. Reducing fat in meat animals. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK, 334-397.
  37. Wood J.D., Nute G.R., Richardson R.I., Whittington F.M., Southwood O., Plastow G., Mansbridge R., Costa N., Chány K.C. (2004): Effect of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Science, 651-667. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.