Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 53(5):204-211 | DOI: 10.17221/314-CJAS

Improvement of accuracy in the estimation of lean meat content in pig carcasses

M. Vítek, J. Pulkrábek, L. Vališ, L. David, J. Wolf
Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic

Fat thickness including skin and muscle depth measured on the left carcass side between the second and third from the last rib 70 mm off the dorsal midline were measured in a total of 168 pig hybrid carcasses. The lean meat content was then determined on the basis of simplified dissections of the carcasses. Multiple regressions of the measurements of the fat and muscle thickness on the lean meat content obtained by dissections were used to construct the following basic regression formulae for the ultrasound and probe apparatuses: γIS-D-05 = 60.69798 - 0.89211SIS-D-05 + 0.10560MIS-D-05 and γ IS-D-15 = 60.92452 - 0.77248SIS-D-15 + 0.11329MIS-D-15, respectively. To increase the accuracy of the prediction formulae, additional measures were included in the calculation which reduced se by 0.48 to 0.54 percent points. The relationships between the lean meat content and other indicators of carcass value were also assessed. The highest correlation coefficient was determined in the ratio of the fat cover area above the musculus longissimus lumborum et thoracis (MLLT) to the MLLT area (r = -0.87). On the contrary, the lean meat content demonstrated the lowest correlation with the cold carcass weight (r = -0.25). Major carcass cuts (ham, loin, shoulder, belly with bones) from the carcasses classified in different SEUROP classes were evaluated. Significant differences between the classes were found in the proportions of cuts without fat cover, fat thickness measured at point "P2", and fat thickness measured on the midline plane separating the left and right sides of the carcass.

Keywords: pig; dissection; lean meat content; prediction formula; SEUROP; classification

Published: May 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vítek M, Pulkrábek J, Vališ L, David L, Wolf J. Improvement of accuracy in the estimation of lean meat content in pig carcasses. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008;53(5):204-211. doi: 10.17221/314-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Branscheid W., Komender P., Oster A., Sack E., Fewson D. (1987): Untersuchungen über die Eignung einzelner Schlachtkörpermasse und Messstellenkombinationen für die Klassifizierung von Schweinehälften nach dem Muskelfleischanteil. Züchtungskunde, 59, 258-267.
  2. Collevet G., Bogner P., Allen P., Busk H., Dobrowolski A., Olsen E., Davenel A. (2005): Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging. Meat Sci., 70, 563-572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Demo P., Poltársky J. (1994): Predikcia podielu mäsových částí ošípaných s využitím niektorých mier jatočného tela. Živoč. Výr., 39, 275-284.
  4. Demo P., Poltársky j., Fülöp l., Lukáčová a. (1995): Instrumental prediction of some carcass parameters of pigs at a progeny testing station. Živoč. Výr., 40, 181- 185. (in Czech)
  5. Daumas g., Causer d., Dhorne t., Schollhammer E. (1998): Les méthodes de classement des carcasses de porc autorisées en France en 1997. Journées Recherche Porcine en France, 30, 1-6.
  6. Desmoulin B., Ecolan p., Peinian P., Mulani C. (1986): Pig carcass classification according to lean percentage. Possibilities and limitations of the Danish Fat - O - Meater. Pig News, 7, 58 pp.
  7. Engel B., Walstra P. (1993): Accounting for subpopulations in prediction of the proportion of lean meat of pig carcasses. Anim. Prod., 57, 147-152. Go to original source...
  8. Engel B., Buist W.G., Walstra P., Olsen E., Daumas G. (2003): Accuracy of prediction of percentage lean meat and authorization of carcass measurement instruments: adverse effects of incorrect sampling of carcasses in pig classification. Anim. Sci., 76, 199-209. Go to original source...
  9. Engel B., Buist w., Lambooij b. (2005): Results Dutch dissection experiment for HGP and Vision. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen Unpublished document UR, Lelystad, Netherlands, 1-13 pp.
  10. Hulsegge B., Sterrenburg P., Merkus G.S.M. (1994): Prediction of lean meat proportion in pig carcasses and in the major cuts from multiple measurements made with the Hennessy Grading Probe. Anim. Prod., 59, 119-123. Go to original source...
  11. Küchenmeister U., Ender K. (1985): The measurement sites and apparatuses for the classification of pig carcasses. Živoč. Výr., 30, 733-741. (in Czech)
  12. Lagin l., Benczová e., Chudý j., Pavlič m. (1995): Objective approach to slaughter pig classification in the Slovak Republic. Živoč. Výr., 40, 369-373. (in Czech)
  13. Margeta V., Kralik G., Kušec G., Baulain U. (2007): Lean and fat development in the whole body and hams of hybrid pigs studied by magnetic resonance tomography. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52, 130-137. Go to original source...
  14. Pomar C., Fortin A., Marcoux M. (2001): Estimation du rendement boucher et de la teneur en viande maigre (TVM) des carcasses de porc à ľ aide de différentes méthodologies de mesure de ľ épaisser de gras et du muscle dorsal. Journées Recherche Porcine en France, 33, 71-77.
  15. Pulkrábek J., Fiedler J., Smital J., Houška L., Adamec T. (1994): Tissue percentages in the side of pork of pig breeds raised in the Czech Republic. Živoč. Výr., 39, 743-751. (in Czech)
  16. Pulkrábek J., Wolf J., Vališ L., Vítek M., Höreth R. (2004): Vergleich verschiedener Methoden zur Bestimmung des Muskelfleischanteils im Schlachtkörper des Schweins. Züchtungskunde, 76, 6-17.
  17. Romvári R., Dobrowolski A., Repa I., Allen P., Olsen E., Szabo A., Horn P. (2006): Development of a computed tomographic calibration method for the determination of lean meat content in pig carcasses. Acta Vet. Hung., 54, 1-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. SAS (2001): Release 8.2 (TS2MO) of the SAS® System for Microsoft ® Windows ®. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  19. Scheper J., Scholz W. (1985): DLG-Schnittführung für die Zerlegung der Schlachtkörper von Rind, Kalb und Schwein. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
  20. Sönnichsen M., Dobrowolski A., Höreth R., Branscheid W. (2002): Videobildauswertung an Schweinehälften. Fleischwirtschaft, 82, 98-101.
  21. Stupka R., Šprysl M., Pour M. (2004): Analysis of the formation of the belly in relation to sex. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49, 64-70. Go to original source...
  22. Šprysl M., Čítek J., Stupka R., Vališ L., Vítek M. (2007): The accuracy of FOM instrument used in on-line pig carcass classification in the Czech Republic. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52, 149-158. Go to original source...
  23. Václavovský J., Matoušek V., Kernerová N., Kouglová P., Nýdl V., Novotný F. (2002): Prediction of lean content in breeding pigs by in vivo and post mortem methods. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 47, 476-483.
  24. Vališ L., Pulkrábek j., Pavlík j., Vítek m., Wolf j. (2005): Conformation and meatiness of pork belly. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, 116-121. Go to original source...
  25. Walstra P. (1991): Definitions and conversion factors for carcasses, cuts and lean tissue. Research Institute for Animal Production Schoonoord, Netherlands.
  26. Walstra P., Merkus G.S.M. (1996): Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Zeist, 1-22.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.