Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2007, 52(12):430-436 | DOI: 10.17221/2333-CJAS

Use of computer image analysis for in vivo estimates of the carcass quality of bulls

P. Polák1, T. Sakowski2, E.N. Blanco Roa1, J. Huba1, E. Krupa1, J. Tomka1, D. Peškovičová1, M. Oravcová1, P. Strapák3
1 Slovak Agricultural Research Centre - Research Institute of Animal Production, Nitra, Slovak Republic
2 Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding of the Polish Academy of Science, Jastrzębiec, Wólka Kosowska, Poland
3 Slovak Agricultural University, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The aims of the paper were to construct models for the estimation of carcass quality by means of computer image analysis and to verify computer photometry as an in vivo method of carcass quality prediction. Results of photometric measurements and carcass quality of 118 Slovak Pied bulls slaughtered at the age of 15 to 18 months were analysed. Nine length dimensions and four area dimensions were measured on the images of the top, left and rear view of each animal. Hot carcass weight (HCW), weight of meat in carcass (WMC) and weight of meat in valuable cuts (WMVC) were obtained after slaughter treatment and carcass dissection. HCW, WMC and WMVC revealed a maximum correlation with the top-view body area (r = 0.54-0.60) and thurl width (r = 0.58-0.60). Stepwise regression was applied to construct linear regression equations for HCW, WMC and WMVC in two alternatives using photometrical dimensions with and without weight before slaughter (WBS). R2 in an alternative without WBS were lower (R2 = 0.47-0.55); however R2 in an alternative with weight before slaughter were higher and highly significant (R2 = 0.83-0.92). In both alternatives, the equation for HCW had the highest R2 and the equation for WMVC had the lowest R2. Equations using photometric dimensions and WBS are suitable to estimate HCW, WMC and WMVC without detailed dissection.

Keywords: cattle; carcass quality; computer image analysis; Slovak Pied breed

Published: December 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Polák P, Sakowski T, Blanco Roa EN, Huba J, Krupa E, Tomka J, et al.. Use of computer image analysis for in vivo estimates of the carcass quality of bulls. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2007;52(12):430-436. doi: 10.17221/2333-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Henningsson T., Ral G., Andersson O., Karlsson U., Martinsson K. (1986): A study of the value of ultrasonic scanning as a method to estimate carcass traits on live cattle. Acta Scand., 36, 36-42. Go to original source...
  2. Jankowski W., Reklewski Z., De Laurans A., Galka E. (1978): Results of in vivo carcass value estimation. Pr. Mater. Zootech., 16, 26-33. (in Polish)
  3. Jensen J., Bech Andersen B., Bergstorm P.L., Busk H., Lagerweij G.W., Oldenbroek J.K. (1985): In vivo estimation of body composition in young bulls for slaughter. II The prediction of carcass traits from scores, ultrasonic scanning and body measurements. Livest. Prod. Sci., 12, 231-239. Go to original source...
  4. Misztal I. (1975): Estimation of carcass composition in live cattle using picture processing system. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., 13, 9-15. (in Polish)
  5. Polák P. (2005): Evaluation of beef production by sonographic and photometric method. [PhD. Thesis.] SarC-riap, Nitra, Slovak Republik, 170 pp.
  6. Polák P., Sloniewski K., Sakowski T., Blanco Roa E.N., Huba J., Krupa E. (2001): In vivo estimates of slaughter value of bulls using ultrasound and body dimensions. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 46, 159-164.
  7. Sakowski T., Cytowski J. (1996): Application of digital image processing in the slaughter value estimation of live bulls. Pr. Mater. Zootech., 47, 61-70. (in Polish)
  8. Sakowski T., Cytowski J., Dymnicki E., Oprzadek J.M. (1996): Accuracy of digital image processing in the estimation of slaughter value of two groups of bulls. Pr. Mater. Zootech., 48, 27-36. (in Polish)
  9. Sakowski T., Kmeť J., Chrenek J., Cytowski J. (1997): Application of digital image processing to estimate slaughter value of Simmental bulls. In: Book of Abstracts of the 48 th Annual Meeting of the EAAP in Vienna. Academic Publishers Vienna, Wageningen. 342 pp.
  10. SAS (2001): SAS/STAT®. Version 8.2. Inc., Cary, NC.
  11. Simm G. (1983): The use of ultrasound to predict the carcass composition of live cattle -a review. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 853-875.
  12. Weniger J.H., Schmidt K.H., Schön L. (1966) Begriffe bei der Bewerung von Schlachtkörpern landswirtschaftlicher Nutztiere. Züchtungskunde, 17, 36-41.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.