Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2005, 50(8):341-346 | DOI: 10.17221/4175-CJAS

Effect of potential probiotic Enterococcus faecium strains on selected microflora in turkeys

M. Marciňáková1, V. Strompfová1, K. Boldižárová1, M. Simonová1, A. Lauková1, P. Naď2
1 Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic
2 University of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic

A group of twenty-six turkeys at the age of seven weeks was divided into four groups (7 birds in three groups 5 in control). The first group of turkeys was used as the control group. The other three groups were inoculated for 7 days with the following bacteria: Enterococcus faecium EE3 strain (2.1 × 109 cfu/ml), E. faecium EK13 strain (1.76 × 1010 cfu/ml) and E. faecium EF55 strain (5 × 108 cfu/ml). Sampling of faeces from each turkey was done at the beginning of experiment (at day 0) and in 7 days from the strain application. The total counts of EE3 strain in faeces of turkeys in EE3 group at day 7 were 4.07 ± 1.04 log cfu/g. At the same day bacteriocin-producing strain EK13 reached the value 5.26 ± 0.2 log cfu/g and the counts of EF55 strain amounted to 4.13 ± 0.64 log cfu/g. When total counts of E. coli colonies were checked at day 7 after the application of EE3 and EF55 strains to turkeys, significant differences in cell counts were found out (in EE3 group a difference of 2.43 log, P < 0.01; in EF55 group a difference of 1.93 log, P < 0.001) compared to the control and EE3 and EF55 groups. The highest reduction of Pseudomonas spp. was determined at day 7 after EE3 strain application (difference of 1.85; P < 0.01) and after EF55 strain application (difference of 0.78 log, P < 0.05) in comparison with the control group. EK13 strain did not influence the counts of E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. in faeces of turkeys. The average daily gain increased in all probiotic groups compared to the control group (EE3 group - 12.2%, EK13 group - 12.9%, EF55 group - 11.8%). At the beginning of experiment the values of total proteins were below the physiological limit in all groups. Although the intake of probiotic strains was associated with an increase in total proteins, the values were not adjusted to the physiological level. The values of total lipids were above the physiological level at the beginning of experiment. Administration of only EE3 strain significantly decreased the level of total lipids (difference of 1.22; log P < 0.01). The values of haematocrit, haemoglobin and activity of the blood enzyme glutathione peroxidase were not influenced.

Keywords: Enterococcus faecium; probiotic; intestinal microflora; daily gain; biochemical and zootechnical parameters

Published: August 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Marciňáková M, Strompfová V, Boldižárová K, Simonová M, Lauková A, Naď P. Effect of potential probiotic Enterococcus faecium strains on selected microflora in turkeys. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2005;50(8):341-346. doi: 10.17221/4175-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bomba A., Nemcová R., Kastel R., Herich R., Pataky J., Cizek M. (1996): Interactions of Lactobacillus spp. and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Vet. Med. - Czech, 41, 155-158. Go to PubMed...
  2. Case T.J. (1990): Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 87, 9610-9614. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Elmer G.W., Surawicz C.M., McFarland L.V. (1996): Biotherapeutic agents: a neglected modality for the treatment and prevention of selected intestinal and vaginal infections. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 275, 870-876. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Filho-Lima J.V.M., Vieira E.C., Nicoli J.R. (2000): Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces boulardii and Escherichia coli combinations against experimental infections with Shigella flexneri and Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice. J. Appl. Microbiol., 88, 365-370. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Francis C., Janky D.M., Arafa A.S., Harms R.H. (1978): Interrelationship of Lactobacillus and zinc bacitracin in diets of turkey poults. Poult. Sci., 57, 1687-1689. Go to original source...
  6. Franz C.M.A., Holzapfel W.H., Stiles M.E. (1999): Enterococci at the crossroads of food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 47, 1-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fuller R. (1999): Probiotics for farm animals. In: Tannock G.W. (ed.): Probiotics: A General Review. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, U.K. 17.
  8. Grešáková Ľ., Boldižárová K., Kuricová S., Levkut M., Leng Ľ. (2003): Device for quantitative collection of chicken excrements in balance studies. J. Anim. Fedd Sci., 12, 351-358. Go to original source...
  9. Jacobsen C.N., Rosenfeldt-Nielsen V., Hayford A.E., Moller P.L., Michaelsen K.F., Paerregaard A., Sandstrom B., Tvede M., Kakobsen M. (1999): Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 4949-4956. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jin L.Z., Ho Y.W., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. (1996): Influence of dried Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacilli cultures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 9, 397-404. Go to original source...
  11. Jin L.Z., Marquardt R.R., Zhao X. (2000): A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine small intestine mucus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 4200-4204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kovalenko N.K., Golovach T.N., Kvasnikov E.I. (1989): Lactic bacteria in the digestive tract of poultry. Mikrobiologiia, 58, 137-143. Go to PubMed...
  13. Lauková A., Guba P., Nemcová R., Strompfová V., Marounek M., Skřivanová V., Volek Z., Jindřichová E., Herich R. (2004): Kmeň Enterococcus faecium EK13 a jeho účinok v tráviacom trakte zvierat. In: XXI. Dni živočíšnej fyziológie, Košice, Slovak Republic, 8.
  14. Mareková M., Lauková A., De Vuyst L., Skaugen M., Nes I.F. (2003): Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strain Enterococcus faecium EK13. J. Appl. Microbiol., 94, 523-530. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Marciňáková M., Strompfová V., Boldižárová K., Lauková A., Gancarčíková S. (2004): Effect of potential probiotic activity of Enterococccus faecium EE3 strain against Salmonella infection in Japanese quails. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 48, 387-390.
  16. Marciňáková M., Simonová M., Strompfová V., Lauková A. (2005): Application of Enterococcus faecium EE3 in healthy dogs. Vet. Res. Com., In press. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Nousianen J., Setälä J. (1993): Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In: Salminen S., von Wright A. (eds.): Lactic Acid Bacteria. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 315-356.
  18. Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S., Isolauri E. (2002): Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie van Leewenhoek, 82, 279-289. Go to original source...
  19. Paglia D.E., Valentine W.N. (1967): Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 70, 158-169.
  20. Simon O., Jadamus A., Vahjen W. (2001): Probiotic feed additives - effectiveness and expected modes of action. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 10, 51-67. Go to original source...
  21. Strompfová V. (2004): Produkcia bakteriocínov a probiotické vlastnosti mikroorganizmov v tráviacom trakte živočíchov a ich fyziologický význam. [PhD Thesis.] 62-63.
  22. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Mudroňová D. (2003): Effect of bacteriocin - like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium EF55 on the composition of avian gastrointestinal microflora. Acta Vet., 72, 559-564. Go to original source...
  23. Vahjen W., Gläser K., Schäfer K., Simon O. (1998): Influence of xylanase-supplemented feed on the development of selected bacterial groups in the intestinal tract of broiler chicks. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 130, 489-500. Go to original source...
  24. Vahjen W., Jadamus A., Simon O. (2002): Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on selected bacterial groups in the small intestine of growing turkey poults. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 56, 419-429. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Watkins B.A., Kratzer F.H. (1983): Effect of oral dosing of Lactobacillus strains on gut colonization and liver biotin in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 62, 2088-2094. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.