Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2004, 49(4):169-176 | DOI: 10.17221/4296-CJAS

A comparison of Holstein Friesian, Brown Swiss and Eastern Anatolian Red cattle slaughtered in Turkey for carcass conformation and fatness in SEUROP system

A. Onenc
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

The study was conducted to compare the carcass conformation and fatness of common slaughter cattle breeds in Turkey. A total of 878 carcasses from pure Holstein Friesian (HF, n = 381), pure Brown Swiss (BS, n = 314) and pure and crosses of Eastern Anatolian Red (EAR, n = 183) males that had been slaughtered in a commercial abattoir between1 October 2000 and1 October 2001 were evaluated. Carcass conformation and fatness classes were evaluated subjectively using photographic patterns according to the SEUROP classification system. According to the data of this study, HF and BS carcasses were heavier and had a better class in fleshiness than EAR. As carcass weight increased, the conformation and fatness class increased. The BS carcasses (-U) had more than one subclass higher fleshiness than HF (+R) carcasses. Conformation of EAR carcasses (-R) was lower than in HF and BS carcasses. However, the fatness scores of HF and EAR carcasses (9.38 = +3) were 0.25 unit higher than in BS (9.63 = -2). The carcass quality was better in HF and BS than in EAR.

Keywords: SEUROP classification; conformation; fleshiness; fatness; carcass grade

Published: April 30, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Onenc A. A comparison of Holstein Friesian, Brown Swiss and Eastern Anatolian Red cattle slaughtered in Turkey for carcass conformation and fatness in SEUROP system. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2004;49(4):169-176. doi: 10.17221/4296-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aass L. (1996): Variation in carcass and meat quality traits and their relations to growth in dual-purpose ca le. Livest. Prod. Sci., 46, 1-12. Go to original source...
  2. Alberti P., Saòudo C., Campo M.M., Franco J., Lahoz F., Olleta J.L. (1997): Caracteristicas productivas de terneros de siete razas bovinas Espaòolas (Productive characteristics of yearlings from seven Spanish breeds). ITEA, VII. Jornadas sobre Producción Animal, 18(II), 745-747.
  3. Allen P., Finnerty N. (2001): Mechanical grading of beef carcasses. Teagasc Research Report, Dublin, 22 pp.
  4. Bjelka M., ©ubrt J., Polách P., Krestýnová M, U endorfský K. (2002): Carcass quality in crossbred bulls in relation to SEUROP system grading. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 47, 467-475.
  5. Borggaard C., Madsen N.T., Thodberg H.H. (2000): In-line image analysis in the slaughter industry, illustrated by beef carcass classification. Meat Sci., 43, 151-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bohuslavek Z. (2002): Estimation of beef carcass conformation carried out at a high-performance aba oir line and based on an impedance method. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 47, 155-159.
  7. Bozó S., Sárdi J., Bárány I., Bölcskey K., Györkös I. (2000): Method for objective evaluation of carcass in ca le and its comparison with the results of S/EUROP classification. In: Van Arendonk J.A.M. (editor in chief): 51st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. The Hague, The Netherlands, 21-24 August. Commission on Ca le Production, Quality Meat: Whole system approaches using breeding, nutrition, quality assurance and marketing. Poster C.6.20, pp. 278.
  8. Drennan M. (1998): The Irish beef industry. R&H Hall Livestock Food Ingredients Technical Bulletin, Issue No. 4, 17 pp.
  9. EEC (1991): Council Regulation EEC No. 1026/91 of 22 April 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1208/81 determining the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. Official Journal, L106, 2-3.
  10. Fiems L.O, De Campeneere S., De Smet S., Van De Voorde G., Vanacker J.M., Bouequé Ch.V. (2000): Relationship between fat depots in carcasses of beef bulls and effect on meat colour and tenderness. Meat Sci., 56, 41-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Florek M., Litwiñczuk Z. (2002): The quality of meat from the carcasses of young bulls and heifers classified according to the EUROP system. In: VII. Conference on Current Problems of Beef Ca le Breeding in face of integration with European Union, 20-21 June, Wroclaw, Poland. Animal Science Papers and Reports, Vol. 20, Suppl. 1, 169-178.
  12. Liinamo A.E. (2000): Breeding for carcass traits in dairy ca le. [Academic Dissertation.] Helsingin Yliopiston Kotieläintieteen Laitoksen Julkaisuja University of Helsinki, Dept. of Animal Science, Publications 53. Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, Finland.
  13. OIK (2000): Red Meat and Meat Products Industry Commission Report. 13-54.
  14. Page J.K. (2001): A survey of beef muscle color and pH. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 678-687. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Parkkonen P., Liinamo A.E., Ojala M. (2000): Estimates of genetic parameters for carcass traits in Finnish Ayrshire and Holstein Friesian. Livest. Prod. Sci., 64, 203-213. Go to original source...
  16. SAS (1985): Statistical Analyses Systems user's guide. 5th ed. Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Raleing, North Caroline.
  17. Silva M.F. (1996): Crescimento caracteristico de carcaçae qualidade da carne em raças bovinas nacionais (Growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality in Portuguese ca le breeds). [PhD. Thesis.] Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria (UTL), Lisboa.
  18. Simoes J.A., Mira J.F.F. (2002): Age, empty body weight and carcass composition at the same proportion of total carcass fat in Portuguese ca le breeds. Livest. Prod. Sci., 74, 159-164. Go to original source...
  19. Van der Werf J.H.J., Van der Waaij L.H., Groen Ab.F., De Jong G. (1998): An index for beef and veal characteristics in dairy ca le based on carcass traits. Livest. Prod. Sci., 54, 11-20. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.