Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2004, 49(1):43-50 | DOI: 10.17221/4270-CJAS

Fish community structure of the middle course of the Bečva River

J. I Namin, P. Spurný
Institute of Fisheries and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

Fish communities of the Bečva River were studied in summer and autumn 2000 and 2001. Electric fishing gear (Honda EX 1000, DC 230 V, 0.75-0.9 kW) was used for sampling. Four sampling sites (Grymov 19.6 r. km, Rybáře 35.8 r. km, Hustopeče 50.7 and Choryně 54.7 r. km) were selected. Total of 23 fish species representing 5 families were determined. The family Cyprinidae with 15 species was dominant while Salmonidae, Balitoridae, Percidae and Gadidae were the other recorded families. Species diversity ranged from 9 at Hustopeče to 20 at Grymov localities. The lowest biomass and abundance were observed at Hustopeče locality (28.93 kg/ha and 336 fishes/ha) and the highest at Choryně locality (612.90 kg/ha and 7 367 fishes/ha). Barbus barbus, Chondrostoma nasus and Leuciscus cephalus contributed 87.73-97.55% and 60.5%-87% to total biomass and abundance in different samplings, respectively. The Chondrostoma nasus population was dominated by fish of total length over 300 mm. We believe that river fragmentation, trapping and blockade of fish are the main reasons for this irregular distribution. Index of diversity ranged from 0.811 to 2.05 and equitability index from 0.449 to 0.821. Physical and chemical parameters were also measured, pH value ranged from 7.8 to 9.8, DO (7.62-12.15 mg/l), conductivity (450-639 µS/cm), N-NH4 (0.65-2.39 mg/l), P-PO4 (0.12-0.68 mg/l)and alkalinity (2.55 to 3.40 mg/l).

Keywords: weirs; fish species; Bečva river; Czech Republic

Published: January 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Namin JI, Spurný P. Fish community structure of the middle course of the Bečva River. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2004;49(1):43-50. doi: 10.17221/4270-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bacalbasa-Dobrovici N. (1989): The Danube River and its fisheries. 455-468. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.): Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium (LARS). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat., 106.
  2. Bode R.W., Novak M.A., Abele L.E. (1993): 20 year trends in water quality of rivers and streams in New York State based on macroinvertebrate data, 1972-1992. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany N.Y. 217 pp.
  3. Bulíček J. (1972): Povrchové vody v Československu a jejich ochrana. Academia, Praha. 354 pp.
  4. Hohausová E., Jurajda P., Prášek V. (1996): Fish assemblage of the River Vsetínská Bečva Basin. Acta Univ. Carol. Biol., 40, 115-121.
  5. Holčik J. (2001): The impact of stream regulation upon the fish fauna and measures to prevent it. Ekológia, 20, 250-262.
  6. Holčik J., Macura V. (2001): Some problems with the interpretation of the impacts of stream regulations upon the fish community. Ekológia, 20, 423-434.
  7. Jungwirth M., Moog O., Muhar S. (1993): Effects of riverbed restructuring on fish and of a fi h order stream, Melk Austria, regulated rivers. Res. Mngmnt, 8, 195-204. Go to original source...
  8. Jurajda P., Ráb P., Šlechta V., Šlechtová V. (1996): Occurrence and identification of Kessler§s gudgeon (Gobio kessleri) in the Bečva River (Czech Republic). Folia Zool., 45, 3.
  9. Kupka J. (1966): Průzkum Horní Bečvy (Vsetínské). Bull. VÚRH Vodňany, č. 2, 13-25.
  10. Lelek A. (1989): The Rhine river and some of its tributaries under human impact in the last two centuries. 469-487. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.): Proceedings of the Int. Large River Symp. (LARS). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat., 106.
  11. Lusk S., Lusková V., Halačka K., Lojkásek B., Horák V. (2000): Hrouzci v rybích společenstvech volných vod ČR. In: Sborník referatů IV. České Ichthyol. Konf., Vodňany, 106-109.
  12. Lusková V., Šlechtová V., Povž M., Šlechta V., Lusk S. (1997): Genetic variability of Chondrostoma nasus in rivers of the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea drainage systems. Folia Zool., 46 (Suppl. 1), 27-36.
  13. Nikolski G.V. (1961): Ekologia ryb (in Russian). Vyd. Vys. Škola, Moskva. 336 pp.
  14. Oliva O. (1952): Příspěvek k poznání rybí fauny Bečvy. Přírodovědný sborník ostravského kraje, č. 13, 193-203.
  15. Pavlov D.S., Ya Vilenkin B. (1989): Present state of the environment, biota, and fisheries of the Volga River. 504-514. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.): Proceedings of the Int. Large River Symp. (LARS). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat., 106.
  16. Parasiewicz P., Schmutz S., Moog O. (1998): The effect of managed hydropower peaking on the physical habitat, benthos and fish fauna in the River Bregenzerach in Austria. Fish. Manage Ecol., 5, 403-417. Go to original source...
  17. Pe s G.E., Imhof J.G., Manny B.A., Maher J.F.B., Weisberg S.B. (1989): Management of fish populations in large rivers: a review of tools and approaches. 578-588. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.): Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium (LARS). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat., 106.
  18. Princ V. (1882): Ryby v Bečvě u Valašskeho Meziříčí. Vesmír, IX, 164-165.
  19. Shannone C.E., Weaver W. (1963): The mathematical theory of communities. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  20. Sheldon A.L. (1969): Equitability indices: dependence on species count. Ecology, 50, 466-467. Go to original source...
  21. Spurný P., Mareš J., Fiala J. (2000): Species diversity of the ichthyocenosis of the lower course of the Bečva River (in Czech with English summary). Biodiverzite ichthyofauny ČR (III), 149-154.
  22. Vlček V., Kestřánek J., Kříž H., Novotný S., Píše J. (1984): Zeměpisný Lexikon ČSR. Vodní toky a nádrže. Academia, Praha. 315 pp.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.