<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>cjs-202007-0002</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2020</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalName>Czech Journal of Animal Science</b:PeriodicalName>
<b:Volume>65</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>7</b:Issue>
<b:Pages>247-257</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Pichler</b:Last><b:First>Josef</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Schwarz</b:Last><b:First>Christiane</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Gierus</b:Last><b:First>Martin</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Schedle</b:Last><b:First>Karl</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Choice feeding in&#8239;fattening pigs: Effect of&#8239;diets differing in&#8239;nutrient density on&#8239;feeding behaviour and fattening performance</b:Title>
<b:Comments>The&#8239;aim of&#8239;this study was to&#8239;determine the&#8239;proportion of&#8239;feed consumed by&#8239;pigs when they had the&#8239;choice to&#8239;meet their nutrient requirements offering a&#8239;low (LND) or a&#8239;high (HND) nutrient dense diet on&#8239;animal performance and feeding behaviour. In&#8239;total 120 barrows and gilts were allotted to&#8239;three dietary treatments (LND, HND and a&#8239;feed choice group, FC). Diets were calculated to&#8239;keep a&#8239;constant ratio of&#8239;megajoule net energy (MJ NE) to&#8239;nutrient standardised ileal digestible (SID) lysine, SID methionine and cysteine, SID threonine, SID tryptophan, Ca, available P&#8239;and Na. Pigs of&#8239;the&#8239;feed choice treatment that could choose between LND and HND chose an&#8239;energy content between 13.3 and 13.6 MJ ME or rather 10.1 and 10.4 MJ NE. The&#8239;ratio between LND and HND changed during the&#8239;growing period to&#8239;a higher percentage of&#8239;HND (26.2% : 73.8% in&#8239;the&#8239;starter, 22.0% : 78.0% in&#8239;the&#8239;grower and 20.0% : 80.0% in&#8239;the&#8239;finisher phase). No differences between barrows and gilts were detected regarding the&#8239;selected diet. As a&#8239;result, similar zootechnical performance data were observed for&#8239;HND and FC, whereas LND led to&#8239;a declined (P &amp;lt; 0.05) performance. Regarding the&#8239;feeding behaviour no differences in&#8239;the&#8239;parameters meal size and daily feeder visits between LND and HND (P &amp;gt; 0.1) were observed. However, within the&#8239;FC treatment more and greater meals were consumed (P &amp;lt; 0.05) at&#8239;the&#8239;HND feeder compared to&#8239;the&#8239;LND feeder. Pigs of&#8239;modern genetics still have the&#8239;ability to&#8239;cover their nutrient requirements choosing between diets differing in&#8239;nutrient density without impairing performance. Furthermore, the&#8239;results give no indication for&#8239;the&#8239;necessity of&#8239;different energy levels in&#8239;diets for&#8239;sexed pigs.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
